Total corneal power estimation: Ray tracing method versus Gaussian optics formula

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 52, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 1716-1722

  Wang, Li ^a   Mahmoud, Ashraf M ^b   Anderson, Betty Lise ^b   Koch, Douglas D ^a   Roberts, Cynthia J ^b  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYTIC METHOD; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA THICKNESS; CORNEAL POWER; EYE REFRACTION; GAUSSIAN OPTICS FORMULA; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; HYPERMETROPIA; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KERATOMILEUSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MYOPIA; PHOTOREFRACTIVE KERATECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAY TRACING METHOD; REFRACTIVE SURGERY; THEORETICAL MODEL; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION;

ADULT; CORNEA; CORNEAL TOPOGRAPHY; HUMANS; HYPEROPIA; KERATOMILEUSIS, LASER IN SITU; LASERS, EXCIMER; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, THEORETICAL; MYOPIA; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; PHOTOREFRACTIVE KERATECTOMY; REFRACTION, OCULAR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79955940554     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.09-4982     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Hugger P, Kohnen T, La Rosa FA, Holladay JT, Koch DD. Comparison of changes in manifest refraction and corneal power after photorefractive keratectomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;129:68-75.
2. Hamed AM, Wang L, Misra M, Koch DD. A comparative analysis of five methods of determining corneal refractive power in eyes that have undergone myopic laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:651-658.
3. Seitz B, Langenbucher A. Intraocular lens calculations status after corneal refractive surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2000;11: 35-46.
4. Freeman MH. Optics. 10th ed. London: Butterworths; 1990:115-120.
5. Harris WF. Effective corneal refractive zone in terms of Gaussian optics. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:2030-2035.
6. Roberts C. The accuracy of power maps to display curvature data in corneal topography systems. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994; 35:3525-3532.
7. Borasio E, Stevens J, Smith GT. Estimation of true corneal power after keratorefractive surgery in eyes requiring cataract surgery: BESSt formula. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:2004-2014.
8. Savini G, Barboni P, Carbonelli M, Hoffer KJ. Agreement between Pentacam and videokeratography in corneal power assessment. J Refract Surg. 2009;25:534-538.
9. Tang M, Li Y, Avila M, Huang D. Measuring total corneal power before and after laser in situ keratomileusis with high-speed optical coherence tomography. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:1843-1850.
10. Norrby S. Pentacam keratometry and IOL power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:3.
11. Olsen T. On the calculation of power from curvature of the cornea. Br J Ophthalmol. 1986;70:152-154.
12. Dubbelman M, Van der Heijde GL, Weeber HA, Vrensen GF. Radius and asphericity of the posterior corneal surface determined by corrected Scheimpflug photography. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2002;80:379-383.
13. Norrby NE. Unfortunate discrepancies. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998;24:433-434.