The art and science of multi-scale citizen science support

Ecological Informatics

Volumn 6, Issue 3-4, 2011, Pages 217-227

  Newman, Greg ^a   Graham, Jim ^a   Crall, Alycia ^c   Laituri, Melinda ^b  

^a Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

^b Warner College of Natural Resources Colorado State University Fort Collins ^*  (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Citizen science; Community based monitoring; Cyber infrastructure; Ecological data management; Web skins

Indexed keywords

DATA MANAGEMENT; ECOLOGICAL APPROACH; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; META-ANALYSIS; NATURAL RESOURCE; RESEARCH PROGRAM; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; WORLD WIDE WEB;

EID: 79955933120     PISSN: 15749541     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2011.03.002     Document Type: Review

References (78)

1. Aberley D., Sieber R. Developed at first international PPGIS conference. First International PPGIS Conference 2002, URISA, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
2. Argent R.M., Perraud J.M., Rahman J.M., Grayson R.B., Podger G.M. A new approach to water quality modelling and environmental decision support systems. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2009, 24:809-818.
3. Bell S., Marzano M., Cent J., Kobierska H., Podjed D., Vandzinskaite D., Reinert H., Armaitiene A., Grodzinska-Jurczak M., Mursic R. What counts? Volunteers and their organisations in the recording and monitoring of biodiversity. Biodivers. Conserv. 2008, 17:3443-3454.
4. Bonney R., Ballard H., Jordan R., McCallie E., Phillips T., Shirk J., Wilderman C.C. Public participation in scientific research: defining the field and assessing its potential for informal science education. A CAISE Inquiry Group Report 2009, Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education (CAISE), Washington, D.C.
5. Bonney R., Cooper C.B., Dickinson J., Kelling S., Phillips T., Rosenberg K.V., Shirk J. Citizen science: a developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. Bioscience 2009, 59:977-984.
6. Chapin M., Lamb Z., Threlkeld B. Mapping indigenous lands. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 2005, 34:619-638.
7. City of Fort Collins Natural Areas Program Natural Areas Program: Frog Survey, 2009 Annual Report 2009, Fort Collins, CO.
8. Coast S. USGS VGI Conference; Personal Communication; Recieved by Greg Newman 2010, Herndon, VA.
9. Cochran E.S., Lawrence J.F., Christensen C., Jakka R.S. The quake-catcher network: citizen science expanding seismic horizons. Seismol. Res. Lett. 2009, 80:26-30.
10. Cohn J.P. Citizen science: can volunteers do real research?. Bioscience 2008, 58:192-197.
11. Cooper C.B., Dickinson J., Phillips T., Bonney R. Citizen science as a tool for conservation in residential ecosystems. Ecol. Soc. 2007, 12(2):11. URL:, [online]. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss12/art11/.
12. Corbett J.M., Keller P. An analytical framework to examine empowerment associated with participatory geographic information systems (PGIS). Cartographica 2005, 40:91-102.
13. Cornell Lab ofOrnithology Citizen Science Central. Cornell Lab of Ornithology 2008.
14. Cornwall A., Jewkes R. What is participatory research?. Soc. Sci. Med. 1995, 41:1667-1676.
15. Cortes U., Sanchez-Marre M., Ceccaroni L., Roda I.R., Poch M. Artificial intelligence and environmental decision support systems. Appl. Intell. 2000, 13:77-91.
16. Community Participation and Geographic Information Systems 2002, Taylor and Francis, London. W. Craig, T. Harris, D. Weiner (Eds.).
17. Danielsen, F., Burgess, N.D., Balmford, A., Donald, P.F., Funder, M., Jones, J.P.G., Alviola, P., Balete, D.S., Blomley, T., Brashares, J., Child, B., Enghoff, M., Fjeldsa, J., Holt, S., Hubertz, H., Jensen, A.E., Jensen, P.M., Massao, J., Mendoza, M.M., Ngaga, Y., Poulsen, M.K., Rueda, R., Sam, M., Skielboe, T., Stuart-Hill, G., Topp-Jorgensen, E., Yonten, D. Local participation in natural resource monitoring: a characterization of approaches. Conservation Biology 2009, 23:31-42.
18. Ely E. Volunteer monitoring & the democratization of science. The Volunteer Monitor 2008, 1-5. Environmental Protection Agency.
19. Friedman A. Framework for Evaluating Impacts of Informal Science Education Projects 2008, National Science Foundation, (Available at:, [On-line]. http://insci.org/resources/Eval_Framework.pdf), A. Friedman (Ed.).
20. Goodchild M.F. Citizens as voluntary sensors: spatial data infrastructure in the world of Web 2.0. Int. J. Spat. Data Infrastructures Res. 2007, 2:24-32.
21. Gouveia C., Fonseca A. New approaches to environmental monitoring: the use of ICT to explore volunteered geographic information. GeoJournal 2008, 72:185-197.
22. Graham J., Newman G., Jarnevich C., Shory R., Stohlgren T.J. A global organism detection and monitoring system for non-native species. Ecol. Inform. 2007, 2:177-183.
23. Graham J., Newman G., Kumar S., Jarnevich C., Young N., Crall A., Stohlgren T.J., Evangelista P. Bringing modeling to the masses: a web based system to predict potential species distributions. Future Internet 2010, 2:624-634.
24. Guariso G., Werthner H. Environmental decision support systems. Computers and Their Applications 1989, Ellis Horwood Limited, Chichester.
25. Haagsma I.G., Johanns R.D. Decision support systems: an integrated approach 1994, 205-212. Environmental Systems. P. Zannetti (Ed.).
26. Haklay M., Weber P. OpenStreetMap: user-generated street maps. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 2008, 7:12-18.
27. Jarnevich C.S., Graham J.J., Newman G.J., Crall A.W., Stohlgren T.J. Balancing data sharing requirements for analyses with data sensitivity. Biol. Invasions 2007, 9:597-599.
28. Kamath Y.H., Smilan R.E., Smith J.G. Reaping benefits with object-oriented technology. AT&T Technol. 1993, 72:14-24.
29. Laituri M., Kodrich K. On line disaster response community: people as sensors of high magnitude disasters using internet GIS. Sensors 2008, 8:3037-3055.
30. Lake R., Farley J. Infrastructure for the geospatial web. The Geospatial Web: How Geobrowsers, Social Software and the Web 2.0 are Shaping the Network Society 2007, 295. Springer-Verlag, London. A. Scharl, K. Tochtermann (Eds.).
31. Lawrence A. 'No personal motive?' Volunteers, biodiversity, and the false dichotomies of participation. Ethics Place Environ. 2006, 9:279-298.
32. Longan M.W. Visions of community and mobility: the community networking movement in the USA. Soc. Cult. Geogr. 2005, 6:849-864.
33. Longan M.W. Service learning and building community with the World Wide Web. J. Geogr. 2007, 106:103-111.
34. McAndrew P., Scanlon E., Clow D. An open future for higher education. Educause Quarterly 2010, 1-8.
35. National Science Board Science and technology: public attitudes and understanding. Science and Engineering Indicators 2008 2008, National Science Board, Arlington, VA, Pages 7:1-47.
36. Nelson G.L., Graves B.M. Anuran population monitoring: comparison of the North American Amphibian Monitoring Program's calling index with mark-recapture estimates for Rana clamitans. J. Herpetol. 2004, 38:355-359.
37. Nerbonne J.F., Nelson K.C. Volunteer macroinvertebrate monitoring: tensions among group goals, data quality, and outcomes. Environ. Manage. 2008, 42:470-479.
38. Newman G., Zimmerman D.E., Crall A., Laituri M., Graham J., Stapel L. User friendly web mapping: lessons from a citizen science website. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2010, 24:1851-1869.
39. Ottinger G. Buckets of resistance: standards and the effectiveness of citizen science. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 2010, 35:244-270.
40. Phang C.W., Kankanhalli A., Sabherwal R. Usability and sociability in online communities: a comparative study of knowledge seeking and contribution. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 2009, 10:721-747.
41. Phillips S.J., Anderson R.P., Schapire R.E. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol. Modell. 2006, 190:231-259.
42. Poch M., Comas J., Rodriguez-Roda I., Sanchez-Marre M., Cortes U. Designing and building real environmental decision support systems. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2004, 19:857-873.
43. Powell M.C., Colin M. Meaningful citizen engagement in science and technology - What would it really take?. Sci. Commun. 2008, 30:126-136.
44. R Development Core Team R: A language and environment for statistical computing 2008, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
45. Rambaldi G., Kyem P.A.K., M.P., M.M., W.D. Participatory spatial information management and communication in developing countries. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Countries 2006, 1-9. EJISDC.
46. Ribes D., Finholt T.A. The long now of technology infrastructure: articulating tensions in development. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 2009, 10:375-398.
47. scienceforcitizens.net scienceforcitizens.net - the source for science you can do 2011.
48. Sieber R. Public participation geographic information systems: a literature review and framework. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 2006, 96:491-507.
49. Silvertown J. A new dawn for citizen science. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2009, 24:467-471.
50. Steiniger S., Hay G.J. Free and open source geographic information tools for landscape ecology. Ecol. Inform. 2009, 4:183-195.
51. Stepenuck K. Wisconsin's Citizen-Based Water Monitoring Network 2010, Environmental Resources Center, Madison, WI.
52. Whitelaw G., Vaughan H., Craig B., Atkinson D. Establishing the Canadian community monitoring network. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2003, 88:409-418.
53. Wilderman C.C., Barron A., Imgrund L. Top down or bottom up? ALLARM's experience with two operational models for community science. Proceedings of the 4th National Monitoring Conference, Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA. National Water Quality Monitoring Council 2004, National Water Quality Monitoring Council, Chattanooga, Tennessee. http://water.usgs.gov/wicp/acwi/monitoring/conference/2004/proceedings_c ontents/13_titlepages/posters/poster_235.pdf.
54. Zimmerman A.S. New knowledge from old data - the role of standards in the sharing and reuse of ecological data. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 2008, 33:631-652.
55. Aberley D., Sieber R. Developed at first international PPGIS conference. First International PPGIS Conference 2002, URISA, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
56. Argent R.M., Perraud J.M., Rahman J.M., Grayson R.B., Podger G.M. A new approach to water quality modelling and environmental decision support systems. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2009, 24:809-818.
57. Bell S., Marzano M., Cent J., Kobierska H., Podjed D., Vandzinskaite D., Reinert H., Armaitiene A., Grodzinska-Jurczak M., Mursic R. What counts? Volunteers and their organisations in the recording and monitoring of biodiversity. Biodivers. Conserv. 2008, 17:3443-3454.
58. Bonney R., Ballard H., Jordan R., McCallie E., Phillips T., Shirk J., Wilderman C.C. Public participation in scientific research: defining the field and assessing its potential for informal science education. A CAISE Inquiry Group Report 2009, Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education (CAISE), Washington, D.C.
59. Bonney R., Cooper C.B., Dickinson J., Kelling S., Phillips T., Rosenberg K.V., Shirk J. Citizen science: a developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. Bioscience 2009, 59:977-984.
60. Chapin M., Lamb Z., Threlkeld B. Mapping indigenous lands. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 2005, 34:619-638.
61. Cohn J.P. Citizen science: can volunteers do real research?. Bioscience 2008, 58:192-197.
62. Cooper C.B., Dickinson J., Phillips T., Bonney R. Citizen science as a tool for conservation in residential ecosystems. Ecol. Soc. 2007, 12(2):11. [online], URL:. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss12/art11/.
63. Cornwall A., Jewkes R. What is participatory research?. Soc. Sci. Med. 1995, 41:1667-1676.
64. Cortes U., Sanchez-Marre M., Ceccaroni L., Roda I.R., Poch M. Artificial intelligence and environmental decision support systems. Appl. Intell. 2000, 13:77-91.
65. Community Participation and Geographic Information Systems 2002, Taylor and Francis, London. W. Craig, T. Harris, D. Weiner (Eds.).
66. Ely E. Volunteer monitoring & the democratization of science. The Volunteer Monitor 2008, 1-5. Environmental Protection Agency.
67. Goodchild M.F. Citizens as voluntary sensors: spatial data infrastructure in the World of Web 2.0. Int. J. Spat. Data Infrastructures Res. 2007, 2:24-32.
68. Gouveia C., Fonseca A. New approaches to environmental monitoring: the use of ICT to explore volunteered geographic information. GeoJournal 2008, 72:185-197.
69. Haagsma I.G., Johanns R.D. Decision support systems: an integrated approach 1994, 205-212. Environmental Systems. P. Zannetti (Ed.).
70. Lawrence A. 'No personal motive?' Volunteers, biodiversity, and the false dichotomies of participation. Ethics Place Environ. 2006, 9:279-298.
71. Longan M.W. Service learning and building community with the World Wide Web. J. Geogr. 2007, 106:103-111.
72. Poch M., Comas J., Rodriguez-Roda I., Sanchez-Marre M., Cortes U. Designing and building real environmental decision support systems. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2004, 19:857-873.
73. Rambaldi G., Kyem P.A.K., M.P, M.M., W.D. Participatory spatial information management and communication in developing countries. EJISDC. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Countries 2006, 1-9.
74. Sieber R. Public participation geographic information systems: a literature review and framework. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 2006, 96:491-507.
75. Silvertown J. A new dawn for citizen science. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2009, 24:467-471.
76. Stepenuck K. Wisconsin's Citizen-Based Water Monitoring Network 2010, Environmental Resources Center, Madison, WI.
77. Whitelaw G., Vaughan H., Craig B., Atkinson D. Establishing the Canadian community monitoring network. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2003, 88:409-418.
78. Wilderman C.C., Barron A., Imgrund L. Top down or bottom up? ALLARM's experience with two operational models for community science. Proceedings of the 4th National Monitoring Conference, Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA. National Water Quality Monitoring Council 2004, National Water Quality Monitoring Counci, Chattanooga, Tennessee. http://water.usgs.gov/wicp/acwi/monitoring/conference/2004/proceedings_c ontents/13_titlepages/posters/poster_235.pdf.