A meta analysis of spray drift sampling

Crop Protection

Volumn 30, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 931-936

  Donkersley, P ^a   Nuyttens, D ^b  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b INSTITUTE FOR AGRICULTURAL AND FISHERIES RESEARCH ILVO   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Eco toxicology; Field; Meta analysis; Orchard; PDPA laser analysis; Pesticide fate; Spray drift; Wind tunnel

Indexed keywords

ECOTOXICOLOGY; FIELD SURVEY; HUMIDITY; LASER; META-ANALYSIS; ORCHARD; PESTICIDE APPLICATION; SAMPLING; STANDARDIZATION; TEMPERATURE EFFECT; TRACER; WIND TUNNEL;

EID: 79955925558     PISSN: 02612194     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2011.03.020     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Arvidsson T. Spray Drift as Influenced by Meteorological and Technical Factors. A Methodological Study 1997, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, (Acta Universitatis Agriculturae).
2. Baetens K., Nuyttens D., Verboven P., De Schampheleire M., Nicolaï B., Ramon H. Predicting drift from field spraying by means of a 3D computational fluid dynamics model. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 2007, 56:161-173.
3. Baetens K., Ho Q.T., Nuyttens D., De Schampheleire M., Melese Endalew A., Hertog M., Nicolaï B., Ramon H., Verboven P. A Validated 2-D diffusion-advection model for prediction of drift from ground boom sprayers. Atmospheric Environment 2009, 43:1674-1682.
4. Balsari P., Marucco P., Tamagnone M. A system to assess the mass balance of spray applied to tree crops. Transactions of the ASAE 2005, 48:1689-1694.
5. Balsari P., Marucco P., Tamagnone M. A test bench for the classification of boom sprayers according to drift risk. Crop Protection 2007, 26:1482-1489.
6. Bode L.E. Downwind drift deposits by ground applications. Proceedings Pesticide Drift Management Symposium 1984, 50.
7. Bouse L.F., Kirk I.W., Bode L.E. Effect of spray mixture on droplet size. Transactions of the ASAE 1990, 33:783-788.
8. Bui Q.D., Womac A.R., Howard K.D., Mulrooney J.E., Amin M.K. Evaluation of samplers for spray drift. Transactions of the ASAE 1998, 41:37-41.
9. Combellack J.H., Western N.M., Richardson R.G. A comparison of the drift potential of a novel twin fluid nozzle with conventional low volume flat fan nozzles when using a range of adjuvants. Crop Protection 1996, 15:147-152.
10. Cooper J.F., Smith D.N., Dobson H.M. An evaluation of two field samplers for monitoring spray drift. Crop Protection 1996, 15:249-257.
11. Crawley M.J. The R Book 2007, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, West Sussex, England.
12. Derksen R.C., Zhu H., Fox R.D., Brazee R.D., Krause C.R. Coverage and drift produced by air induction and conventional hydraulic nozzles used for orchard applications. Transactions of the ASABE 2007, 50:1493-1501.
13. De Schampheleire M., Baetens K., Nuyttens D., Spanoghe P. Spray drift measurements to evaluate the Belgian drift mitigation measures in field crops. Crop Protection 2008, 27:577-589.
14. De Schampheleire M., Nuyttens D., Dekeyser D., Verboven P., Spanoghe P., Cornelis W., Gabriels D., Steurbaut W. Deposition of spray drift behind border structures. Crop Protection 2009, 28:1061-1075.
15. De Schampheleire M., Nuyttens D., Baetens K., Cornelis W., Gabriels D., Spanoghe P. Effects on pesticide spray drift of the physicochemical properties of the spray liquid. Precision Agriculture 2009, 10:409-420.
16. Ferreira M.C., Miller P.C.H., Tuck C.R., O'Sullivan C.M. Comparison of sampling arrangements to determine airborne spray profiles in wind tunnel conditions. Aspects of Applied Biology: International Advances in Pesticide Application 2010, 291-296.
17. Gilbert A.J. Local environment risk assessment for pesticides (LERAP) in the UK. Aspects of Applied Biology 2000, 57:83-90.
18. Hadfield D.J. Techniques for Spray Drift Measurements: A Literature Review 1984, Note DN1251, Crop Engineering Division, National Institute of Agricultural Engineering. Div., Silsoe, Bedford.
19. Ihaka R., Gentleman R. R: a language for data analysis and graphics, version 2.10. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 1996, 5:299-314.
20. ISO Equipment for Crop Protection - Methods for field Measurements of Spray Drift 2006, ISO TC 23/SC 06.
21. May K.R., Clifford R. The impaction of aerosol particles on cylinders, spheres, ribbons and disks. Annals of Occupational Hygiene 1967, 10:83-95.
22. Miller P.C.H. Spray drift and its measurement. Application Technology for Crop Protection 1993, CAB International, Wallingford. G.A. Matthews, F.C. Hislop (Eds.).
23. Miller P.C.H., Walklate P.J., Mawer C.J. A comparison of spray drift collection techniques. Proceedings of the Brighton Crop Protection Conference, Weeds 1989, 669-676.
24. Miller P.C.H., Ellis M.C.B. Effects of formulation on spray nozzle performance for applications from ground-based boom sprayers. Crop Protection 2000, 19:609-615.
25. Nuyttens, D., 2007, Drift from field crop sprayers: the influence of spray application technology determined using indirect and direct drift assessment means. PhD Dissertation nr. 772, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
26. Nuyttens D., De Schampheleire M., Baetens K., Sonck B. The influence of operator controlled variables on spray drift from field crop sprayers. Transactions of the ASABE 2007, 50:1129-1140.
27. Nuyttens D., Baetens K., De Schampheleire M., Sonck B. Effect of nozzle type, size and pressure on spray droplet characteristics. Biosystems Engineering 2007, 97:333-345.
28. Nuyttens D., Taylor W.A., De Schampheleire M., Verboven P., Dekeyser D. Influence of nozzle type and size on drift potential by means of different wind tunnel evaluation methods. Biosystems Engineering 2009, 103:271-280.
29. Nuyttens D., De Schampheleire M., Verboven P., Brusselman E., Dekeyser D. Droplet size-velocity characteristics of agricultural sprays. Transactions of the ASABE 2009, 52:1471-1480.
30. Nuyttens D., De Schampheleire M., Verboven P., Sonck B. Comparison between indirect and direct spray drift assessment methods. Biosystems Engineering 2010, 105:2-12.
31. Nuyttens D., De Schampheleire M., Baetens K., Brusselman E., Dekeyser D., Verboven P. Drift from field crop sprayers using an integrated approach: results of a 5 year study. Transactions of the ASABE 2011, Paper No. 1009017.
32. Praat J.P., Maber J., Manktelow D.W.L. The effect of canopy development and sprayer position on spray drift from a pipfruit orchard. Proceedings New Zealand Plant Protection 2000, 53:241-247.
33. Qi L., Miller P.C.H., Fu Z. The classification of the drift risk of sprays produced by spinning discs based on wind tunnel measurements. Biosystems Engineering 2008, 100:38-43.
34. Raupach M.R., Woods N., Dorr G., Leys J.F., Cleugh H.A. The entrapment of particles by windbreaks. Atmospheric Environment 2001, 35:3373-3383.
35. Salyani M., Cromwell R. Adjuvants to reduce drift from handgun spray applications. Pesticide Formulations and Application Systems 1993, 12th Vol.:363-376. STP 1146, ASTM. B.N. Devisetty, D.G. Chasin, P.D. Berger (Eds.).
36. Salyani M. Methodologies for Assessment of Spray Deposition in Orchard Applications, ASAE Annual International Meeting 2000, 9-12 July 2000, American Society of Agricultural Engineers, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA, pp. 1-11.
37. Salyani M., Sweeb R.D., Farooq M. Comparison of string and ribbon samplers in orchard spray applications. Transactions of the ASABE 2006, 49:1705-1710.
38. A Summary of Airblast Application Studies. Report for the Spray Drift Task Force 1997, SDTF, [Confidential: No further information provided].
39. A Summary of Ground Application Studies. Report for the Spray Drift Task Force 1997, SDTF, [Confidential: No further information provided].
40. Teske M.E., Thistle H.W. A simulation of release height and wind speed effects for drift minimization. Transactions of the ASABE 1999, 42:583-591.
41. van de Zande J.C., Holterman H.J., Porskamp H.A.J., Huijsmans J.F.M. Modelling spray drift from boom sprayers. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 1997, 19:1-22.
42. van de Zande J.C. Spray drift and buffer zones. Aspects of Applied Biology: Danish Crop Protection Conference 2002, 1-10.
43. van de Zande J.C., Holterman H.J., Porskamp H.A.J. Influence of Reference Nozzle Choice on Spray Drift Classification 2004, Proceedings of the International Conference on Pesticide Application for Drift Management, 359-365.
44. van de Zande J.C., Stallinga H., Michielsen J.M.G.P., Van Velde P. Effect of the width of spray-free buffer zones, nozzle type and air assistance on spray drift. Aspects of Applied Biology: International Advances in Pesticide Application 2010, 99:255-263.
45. Vercruysse F., Steurbaut W., Drieghe S., Dejonckheere W. Off target ground deposits from spraying a semi-dwarf orchard. Crop Protection 1999, 18:565-570.
46. Wolf T.M., Caldwell B.C. Development of a Canadian spray drift model for the determination of buffer zone distances. Expert Committee on Weeds - Comité d'experts en malherbologie (ECWCEM). Proceedings of the 2001 National Meeting, Québec City 2001, 60. ECW-CEM, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, Québec. D. Bernier, D.R.A. Campbell, D. Cloutier (Eds.).