메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 2008, Issue , 2001, Pages 137-151

A comparison of two architectural power models

Author keywords

Architectural definition stage; Performance comparison; Power analysis tools; Validation

Indexed keywords

POWER MANAGEMENT;

EID: 79955922024     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-44572-2_11     Document Type: Conference Paper
Times cited : (8)

References (14)
  • 5
    • 0005320209 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Architectural level power/performance optimization and dynamic power estimation
    • November
    • G. Cai and C. H. Lim. Architectural level power/performance optimization and dynamic power estimation. Cool Chips Tutorial colocated with MICRO32, November 1999.
    • (1999) Cool Chips Tutorial colocated with MICRO32
    • Cai, G.1    Lim, C.H.2
  • 8
    • 0013035133 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Using IPC Variation in Workloads with Externally Specified Rates to Reduce Power Consumption
    • Vancouver, Canada, June
    • S. Ghiasi, J. Casmira, and D. Grunwald. Using IPC Variation in Workloads with Externally Specified Rates to Reduce Power Consumption. In Workshop on Complexity Effective Design, Vancouver, Canada, June 2000.
    • (2000) Workshop on Complexity Effective Design
    • Ghiasi, S.1    Casmira, J.2    Grunwald, D.3
  • 10
    • 0003926726 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Quantifying the complexity of superscalar processors
    • University of Wisconsin, November
    • S. Palacharla, N. P. Jouppi, and J. E. Smith. Quantifying the complexity of superscalar processors. Technical Report CS-TR-96-13-28, University of Wisconsin, November 1996.
    • (1996) Technical Report CS-TR-96-13-28
    • Palacharla, S.1    Jouppi, N.P.2    Smith, J.E.3


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.