Influence of different professional prophylactic methods on fluorescence measurements for detection of occlusal caries

Caries Research

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 264-268

  Diniz, M B ^a,b   Sciasci, P ^a   Rodrigues, J A ^c   Lussi, A ^d   Cordeiro, R C L ^a  

^a SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSIDADE CRUZEIRO DO SUL   (Brazil)

^c FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL   (Brazil)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Caries detection; Fluorescence; Occlusal caries; Permanent teeth; Professional prophylaxis; Prophylactic paste

Indexed keywords

BICARBONATE; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; FLUORESCENT DYE; RHODAMINE; RHODAMINE B; TOOTHPASTE; WATER;

AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTIN; ENAMEL; FLUORESCENCE; HUMAN; LASER; MEDICAL PHOTOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; PREVENTIVE DENTISTRY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TIME; TOOTH CROWN;

AREA UNDER CURVE; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL PROPHYLAXIS; DENTIN; FLUORESCENCE; FLUORESCENT DYES; HUMANS; LASERS; PHOTOGRAPHY, DENTAL; RHODAMINES; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SODIUM BICARBONATE; TIME FACTORS; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTHPASTES; WATER;

EID: 79955909556     PISSN: 00086568     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000326110     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Anttonen V, Seppä L, Hausen H: Clinical study on the effect of professional cleaning of occlusal tooth surfaces on laser fluorescence measurements. Caries Res 2005; 39: 280-283. (Pubitemid 41016908)
2. De Benedetto MS, Morais CC, Novaes TF, Rodrigues JA, Braga MM, Mendes FM: Comparing the reliability of a new fluorescence camera with conventional laser fluorescence devices in detecting caries lesions in occlusal and smooth surfaces of primary teeth. Lasers Med Sci 2010; 26: 157-162.
3. Diniz MB, Rodrigues JA, Hug I, Cordeiro RCL, Lussi A: The influence of pit and fissure sealants on infrared fluorescence measurements. Caries Res 2008; 42: 328-333.
4. Diniz MB, Rodrigues JA, Paula AB, Cordeiro RCL: In vivo evaluation of laser fluorescence performance using different cut-off limits for occlusal caries detection. Lasers Med Sci 2009; 24: 295-300.
5. Francescut P, Zimmerli B, Lussi A: Influence of different storage methods on laser fluorescence values: A two-year study. Caries Res 2006; 40: 181-185. (Pubitemid 43760292)
6. Hibst R, Paulus R, Lussi A: A detection of occlusal caries by laser fluorescence: Basic and clinical investigations. Med Laser Applic 2001; 16: 295-213.
7. Hosoya Y, Matsuzaka K, Inoue T, Marshall GW: Influence of tooth-polishing pastes and sealants on DIAGNOdent values. Quintessence Int 2004; 35: 605-611. (Pubitemid 39091428)
8. Lussi A, Hellwig E: Performance of a new laser fluorescence device for the detection of occlusal caries in vitro. J Dent 2006; 34: 467-471. (Pubitemid 44164312)
9. Lussi A, Imwinkelried S, Pitts N, Longbottom C, Reich E: Performance and reproducibility of a laser fluorescence system for detection of occlusal caries in vitro. Caries Res 1999; 33: 261-266.
10. Lussi A, Reich E: The influence of toothpastes and prophylaxis pastes on fluorescence measurements for caries detection. Eur J Oral Sci 2005; 113: 141-144. (Pubitemid 40592280)
11. Mendes FM, Hissadomi M, Imparato JC: Effects of drying time and the presence of plaque on the in vitro performance of laser fluorescence in occlusal caries of primary teeth. Caries Res 2004; 38: 104-108. (Pubitemid 38228430)
12. Rodrigues JA, Hug I, Diniz MB, Lussi A: Performance of fluorescence methods, radiographic examination and ICDAS II on occlusal surfaces in vitro. Caries Res 2008; 42: 297-304.
13. Thoms M: Detection of intraoral lesions using a fluorescence camera. Proc SPIE Lasers in Dentistry XII, 2006; 6137: 1-7.