Caesarean section in the absence of need: A pathologising paradox for public health?

Nursing Inquiry

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 143-153

  Douché, Jeanie ^a   Carryer, Jenny ^b  

^a MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

^b MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Childbirth; Discourse; Feminism; Inequalities in health; Midwifery

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CESAREAN SECTION; DECISION MAKING; DELIVERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MIDWIFE; NEW ZEALAND; PREGNANCY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE;

CESAREAN SECTION; DECISION MAKING; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MIDWIFERY; NEW ZEALAND; PREGNANCY; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 79955894460     PISSN: 13207881     EISSN: 14401800     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1800.2011.00533.x     Document Type: Article

References (111)

1. Al-Mufti R, A McCarthy and N Fisk 1996. Obstetricians' personal choice and mode of delivery. The Lancet, 347: 544.
2. Amu O, S Rejendran and I Bolagi 1998. Maternal choice alone should not determine method of delivery. British Medical Journal 317: 463-4.
3. Ananth C, J Smilian and A Vinzilileos 1997. The association of placenta previa with a history of caesarean delivery and abortion. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 177: 1071-8.
4. Armstrong D. 1995. The rise of surveillance medicine. Sociology of Health and Illness 17: 393-404.
5. Bailit J, T Love and B Mercer 2004. Rising cesarean rates: Are patients sicker? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 191: 800-3.
6. Bailit J, J Garrett, W Miller, M McMahon and R Cefalo 2002. Hospital primary cesarean delivery rates and the risk of poor neonatal outcomes. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 187: 721-7.
7. Barbour RS. 2001. Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: A case of the tail wagging the dog? British Medical Journal 322: 1115-7.
8. Belgrave M. 1991. Medicine and the rise of the health professions in New Zealand 1860-1939. In A healthy country: Essays on the social history of medicine in New Zealand ed. L Bryder, 7-24. Wellington: Bridget Williams Books.
9. Benn C. 1999. Midwifery partnership: Individualism, contracturalism or feminist praxis? New Zealand College of Midwives Journal 21: 18-20.
10. Bewley S and J Cockburn 2002 II. The un-facts of 'request' caesarean section: Commentary. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 109: 597-605.
11. Braun V. 2005. In search of (better) sexual pleasure: Female genital 'cosmetic' surgery. Sexualities 8: 407-24.
12. Brooks A. 1997. Postfeminisms: Feminism, cutural theory and cultural forms. London: Routledge.
13. Bryant J, M Porter, S Tracy and E Sullivan 2007. Caesarean birth: Consumption, safety, order and good mothering. Social Science & Medicine 65: 1192-201.
14. Bunkle P. 1998. Women, health and politics: Divisions and connections. In Feminist thought in Aotearoa New Zealand: Differences and connections, eds R Du Plessis and L Alice, 238-244. Auckland: Oxford University Press.
15. Carryer J and K Rhodes 1998. Living outside the boundary. In Feminist thought in Aotearoa New Zealand: Differences and connections, eds R Du Plessis and L Alice, 172-177. Auckland: Oxford University Press.
16. Cartwright S. 1988. The report of the cervical cancer inquiry. Auckland: Government Press.
17. Central Regional Health Authority. 1996. Notice issued pursuant to section 51 of the health and disability services act, 1993 concerning the provision of maternity services, 1996 (Vol. 1, pp. 1-80). Wellington: Regional Health Authority.
18. Childbirth Connection. 2006. Alert and Responses: NIH cesarean conference: Interpreting meeting and media reports. Childbirth connection. (accessed 8 September 2006).
19. Clark H. 1990. Introduction to the Nurses Amendment Bill. New Zealand College of Midwives Journal 2: 9-10.
20. Cluett E and R Bluff 2000. Principles and practice of research in midwifery. London: Bailliere Tindall.
21. Cole S. 2002. Parent centre calls for a user-pays regime for elective caesarean sections, for non-medical reasons. Parents Centre Newsletter, 9: 1.
22. Coney S. 1993. Standing in the sunshine: A history of New Zealand women since they won the vote. Auckland: Viking, Penguin.
23. Cosgel M. 1992. Rhetoric in the economy: Consumption and audience. Journal of Social-Economics 21: 363-77.
24. Cotzias CS, S Paterson-Brown and N Fisk 2001. Obstetricians say yes to maternal request for elective caesarean section: a survey of current opinion. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Biology, 97: 15-6.
25. Crowe M. 2000. Constructing normality: a discourse analysis of DSM-IV. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 7: 69-77.
26. Daily Telegraph. 2001. Too posh to push. The Dominion Post, 9 June.
27. Davis-Floyd R. 1994. The technocratic body: American childbirth as cultural expression. Social Science & Medicine 38: 1125-40.
28. DeClercq E, F Menacker and M MacDorman 2005. Rise in "no indicated risk' primary caesareans in the United States, 1991-2001: Cross sectional analysis. British Medical Journal 330: 71-2.
29. Department of Health. 1989. Discussion paper on care for pregnancy and childbirth. Wellington: Department of Health.
30. Dew K and A Kirkman 2002. Sociology of health. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31. Donley J. 1986. Save the midwife. Auckland: New Women's Press.
32. Douché J. 2001. Caesarean section in the absence of clinical indications. The first cut is the deepest. New Zealand College of Midwives Journal 24: 18-22.
33. Douché J. 2007. Caesarean section in the absence of clinical indications: Discourses constituting choice in childbirth. Doctoral thesis: School of Health and Social Services, Massey University, Palmerston, New Zealand.
34. Douché J. 2009. Rhetorical (de)vices and the construction of a 'natural' caesarean. The New Zealand College of Midwives Journal 40: 20-3.
35. Du Plessis R and L Alice 1998. Introduction: Feminisms, connections and differences. In Feminist thought in Aotearoa New Zealand: Connections and differences, eds R Du Plessis and L Alice, xv-xx. Auckland: Oxford University Press.
36. Ettorre E. 2002. Shaping pregnant bodies: Distorting metaphors, reproductive asceticism and genetic capital. In Reproductive genetics, gender and the body, ed. E Ettorre, 70-85. London: Routledge.
37. Fleming V. 1998. Women and midwives and partnership: A problematic relationship? Journal of Advanced Nursing 27: 8-14.
38. Fogelson S, MK Menard, T Hulsey and M Ebeling 2005. Neonatal impact of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term: A comment on patient choice cesarean delivery. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 192: 1433-6.
39. Foucault M. 1972. The archaeology of knowledge. London: Tavistosk Publications Ltd.
40. Fowler W. 2000. Focussing upstream to analyse perinatal mortality rates. British Journal of Midwifery 8: 415-20.
41. Fransen L. 2003. The impact of inequality on the health of mothers. Midwifery 19: 79-81.
42. Freeman L, H Timperley and V Adair 2004. Partnership in midwifery care in New Zealand. Midwifery 20: 2-14.
43. Gamble J and D Creedy 2000. Women's preference for caesarean section. Incidence and associated factors. Birth 27: 256-63.
44. Grosz E. 1994. Volatile bodies. Toward a corporeal feminism. St Leonards: Allen and Unwin.
45. Guilliland K. 1989. Guest editorial. New Zealand College of Midwives Journal, 1: 4.
46. Guilliland K and S Pairman 1995. The midwifery partnership - A model for practice (Vol. 95/1). Wellington: Victoria University.
47. Health Commissioner. 1996. The Code of Health and Disabilities Consumer Rights, 1996, No 88 Schedule of the Health and Disability Commissioner Act (1994). Wellington: New Zealand Government.
48. Healy M. 2006. A cut above. The Dominion Post, 18 March: E5.
49. Hillan E. 2000. The aftermath of caesarean delivery. MIDIRS Midwifery Digest 10: 70-2.
50. Hird MJ. 2003. New feminist sociological directions. Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers Canadiens De Sociologie 28: 447-62.
51. Howden-Chapman P. 2005. Unequal socio-economic determinants, unequal health. In Health and society in Aotearoa New Zealand, eds K Dew and P Davis, 51-68. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
52. Jukelevics N. 2009. Putting mothers and babies at risk: Promoting the elusive "caesarean delivery on maternal request". Birth 36: 254-7.
53. Kent J. 2000. Social perspectives on pregnancy and childbirth for nurses and the caring professions. Buckingham: Open University Press.
54. Kitzinger S. 2001. Who would choose to have a caesarean? British Journal of Midwifery 9: 284-5.
55. Lauchland M. 1996. The shared journey: Models in midwifery practice. New Zealand College of Midwives Journal 14: 24-7.
56. Longhurst R and L Johnston 1998. Embodying places and emplacing bodies. Pregnant women and women body builders. In Feminist thought in Aotearoa New Zealand, eds R Du Plessis and L Alice, 156-63. Auckland: Oxford University Press.
57. Lupton D. 1999. Risk. London: Routledge.
58. nd edn, ed. D Lupton, 54-83. London: Sage Publications.
59. MacDorman MF, E Declercq, F Menacker and MH Malloy 2006. Infant and neonatal mortality for primary Cesarean and vaginal births to women with "No indicated risk, " United States, 1998-2001 birth cohorts. Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care 33: 175-82.
60. Massumi B. 1993. The politics of everyday fear. Minneapolis: Minneapolis University Press.
61. Mein-Smith P. 1986. Maternity in dispute: New Zealand 1920-1939. Wellington: V.R. Ward Government Printer.
62. Ministry of Health. 2001. Report on maternity, 1999. Wellington: Ministry of Health.
63. Ministry of Health. 2002. Reducing inequalities in health. Wellington: Ministry of Health.
64. Ministry of Health. 2003. Report on maternity, 2000 & 2001. Wellington: Ministry of Health.
65. Ministry of Health. 2004. Report on maternity, 2002. Maternal and newborn information. Wellington: Ministry of Health.
66. Ministry of Health. 2006. Report on maternity. Maternal and newborn information 2003. (accessed 26 May 2010).
67. Ministry of Health. 2009. Eligibility for publically funded health and disability services. (accessed 20 March 2009).
68. Ministry of Health. 2007. Report on maternity 2004: Maternal and newborn information 2003. (accessed 11 June 2010).
69. Moorhead J. 2005. Every bit as magical. The Guardian 3 December, (accessed 1 March 2010).
70. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. 2004. Caesarean section. London: National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health.
71. National, Institute of Health. 2006. National Institute of Health state-of-the-science conference statement: Cesarean delivery on maternal request. (accessed 8 September 2006).
72. th edn, Christchurch: New Zealand College of Midwives.
73. th edn, Wellington: New Zealand Nurses Association.
74. Pairman S. 2002. Towards self-determination. The separation of the maternity and nursing professions in New Zealand. In Nursing in New Zealand: Critical issues, different perspectives, ed. E Papps, 14-27. Auckland: Prentice Hall.
75. Pairman S. 2004. Chairperson's Introduction. Midpoint midwifery Council of New Zealand Newsletter, December 1.
76. Papps E and M Olssen 1997. Doctoring childbirth and regulating midwifery in New Zealand: A Foucauldian perspective. Palmerston North: Dunmore Press.
77. Parker J. 1997. The body as text and the body as living flesh: Metaphors of the body and nursing in postmodernity. In The body in nursing, ed. J. Lawler, 11-29. Melbourne: Churchill Livingston.
78. Parkes C. 1991. The impact of the medicalisation of New Zealand's maternity services on women's experience of childbirth, 1904-1937. In Healthy country: Essays on the social history of medicine in New Zealand, ed. L Bryder, 165-80. Wellington: Bridget Williams Books.
79. Parson S. 2002. When push comes to shove. The Dominion Post, 8 July: B8.
80. Paterson-Brown S. 1998. Should doctors perform an elective caesarean section on request? Yes, as long as the woman is fully informed British Medical Journal, 317: 462-3.
81. Peckman S and C Carlson 2005. Tackling health inequalities. In Midwifery and public health, ed. P. O'Luanaigh, 63-82. London: Elsevier- Churchill Livingston.
82. Penna L and S Arulkumaran 2003. Cesarean section for non-medical reasons. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 82: 399-409.
83. Petrou S, J Henderson and C Glazener 2001. Economic aspects of caesarean section and alternative modes of delivery. Best Practice & Research in Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology 15: 145-63.
84. Potts A, N Gavey and A Weatherall 2004. Introducing sex and the body: Feminist scholarship from downunder on sexuality, gender and embodiment. In Sex and the body, eds A Potts, N Gavey and A Wetherall, 7-16. Palmerston North: Dunmore Press.
85. Ramsden I. 2002. Cultural safety and nursing education in Aotearoa and Te Waipounamu. Unpublished PhD thesis: Victoria University of Wellington.
86. Ramsden I. 2005. Towards cultural safety. In Cultural Safety in Aotearoa New Zealand, ed. D Wepa, 2-19. Auckland: Pearson Education.
87. Rasmussen S, S Albrechtsen and K Dalaker 2000. Obstetric history and the risk of placenta previa. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica 79: 502-7.
88. Reid P, B Robson and C Jones 2000. Disparities in health: Common myths and uncommon truths'. Pacific Health Dialogue 7: 33-47.
89. Richardson B, M Czikk, O daSilva and R Natale 2005. The impact of labor at term on measures of neonatal outcome. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 192: 219-26.
90. Robertson A. 2001. Biotechnology, political rationality and discourses on health risk. Health 5: 293-309.
91. Shildrick M. 1997. Feminist theory and postmodenism. In Leaky bodies and boundaries: Feminism, postmodernism and (bio)ethics, ed. M Shildrick, 144-79. London: Routledge.
92. Skinner J. 1999. Midwifery partnership: Individualism, contractualism or feminist praxis. New Zealand College of Midwives Journal 21: 14-7.
93. Skolbekken JA. 1995. The risk epidemic in medical journals. Social Science & Medicine 40: 291-305.
94. Smith J, F Plaat and N Fisk 2008. The natural caesarean: A women-centred technique. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 115: 1037-41.
95. Smyth H. 2000. Rocking the cradle: Contraception, sex and politics in New Zealand. Wellington: Steele Roberts LTD.
96. Song S, A Downie, H Gibson, K Kloberdanz and J McDowell 2004. Medicine: Too posh to push? As more pregnant women schedule c-sections, doctors warn that the procedure is not risk-free. Time Magazine 19 April 2004 (accessed 1 March 2010).
97. Stojanovic J. 2002. Leaving your dignity at the door: Maternity in Wellington 1950-1970. Unpublished master's thesis: Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.
98. Sunday Times. 2004. US mums too proud to push: C-sections cut to the core of vanity issues. Sunday Star Times, 3 October, A19.
99. Surtees R. 2004. Midwifery partnership with women in Aotearoa/New Zealand: A post-structuralist feminist perspective on the use of epidurals in 'normal' birth. In Pregnancy, birth and maternity care: Feminist perspectives, ed. M Stewart, 168-83. Oxford: Elsevier Science Limited.
100. Tudor Hart J. 1971. The inverse care law. Lancet 1: 405-412.
101. Tudor Hart J. 2000. Commentary: Three decades of the inverse care law. British Medical Journal 320: 18-9.
102. Tully L, R Daellenback and K Guillialnd 1998. Feminism, partnership and midwifery. In Feminist thought in Aotearoa New Zealand: Connections and differences, eds R Du Plessis and L Alice, 245-53. Auckland: Oxford University Press.
103. Tully E and B Mortlock 2005. Professional practices. In Health and society in Aotearoa New Zealand, eds K Dew and P Davis 130-145. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
104. Usta IM, EM Hobeika, AA Abu Musa, GE Gabriel and AH Nassar 2005. Placenta previa-accreta: Risk factors and complications. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 193: 1045-49.
105. Vandenberg M. 2002. Hospitals may turn away 'too posh to push' mums. Contact 12 September:1.
106. Varner M. 2008. Editor's commentary. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 115: 1042.
107. Wax JR, A Cartin, MG Pinette and J Blackstone 2005. Patient choice cesarean: The Maine experience. Birth 32: 203-6.
108. nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
109. Williams S and G Bendelow 1998. Bodily order: Cultural and historical perspectives on conformity and trangression. In The lived body: Sociological themes, embodied issues, eds S Williams and G Bendelow, 25-48. London: Routledge.
110. Woodward A and I Kawachi 2000. Why reduce inequalities? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 54: 923-9.
111. Young D. 2006. Editorial. "Cesarean delivery on maternal request": Was the NIH conference based on a faulty premise? Birth 33: 171-4.