Mass prediction of proton-rich nuclides with the Coulomb displacement energies in the relativistic point-coupling model

Science China: Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 210-214

  Sun, Bao Hua ^a,b   Zhao, Peng Wei ^c   Meng, Jie ^a,c  

^a BEIHANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c Peking University   (China)

Author keywords

Coulomb displacement energy; Relativistic point coupling model; rp process; Two proton emitters; Z = 20 55

Indexed keywords

DISPLACEMENT ENERGIES; RELATIVISTIC POINT-COUPLING MODEL; RP-PROCESS; TWO-PROTON EMITTERS; Z = 20-55;

PROTONS;

EID: 79955889395     PISSN: 16747348     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11433-010-4222-8     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Lunney D, Pearson J M, Thibault C. Recent trends in the determination of nuclear masses. Rev Mod Phys, 2003, 75: 1021-1082. (Pubitemid 37244524)
2. Audi G, Bersillon O, Blachot J, et al. The AME2003 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references. Nucl Phys A, 2004, 729: 337-676. (Pubitemid 37495859)
3. Schatz H, Aprahamian A, Görres J, et al. rp-process nucleosynthesis at extreme temperature and density conditions. Phys Rep, 1998, 294: 167-263. (Pubitemid 128186379)
4. Zhao P W, Li Z P, Yao J M, et al. New parametrization for the nuclear covariant energy density functional with point-coupling interaction. Phys Rev C, 2010, 82: 054319.
5. Ormand W E. Mapping the proton drip line up to A = 70. Phys Rev C, 1997, 55: 2407-2417.
6. Cole B J. Predicted proton and two-proton decay energies for nuclei in the upper f p shell. Phys Rev C, 1999, 59: 726-730.
7. Brown B A. Proton drip-line calculations and the rp process. Phys Rev C, 2002, 65: 045802.
8. Sun B. Private communication.
9. Goriely S, Chamel N, Pearson J M. Skyrme-Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov nuclear mass formulas: Crossing the 0.6 MeV accuracy threshold with microscopically deduced pairing. Phys Rev Lett, 2009, 102: 152503.
10. Geng L S, Toki H, Meng J. Masses, deformations and charge radiinuclear ground-state properties in the relativistic mean field model. Prog Theor Phys, 2005, 113: 785-800. (Pubitemid 40989877)
11. Möller P, Nix J R, Myers W D, et al. Nuclear ground-state masses and deformations. Atom Data Nucl Data Tables, 1995, 59: 185-381.
12. Goriely S. Nuclear inputs for astrophysics applications. AIP Conf Proc, 2000, 529: 287-294.
13. Pearson J M, Nayak R C, Goriely S. Nuclear mass formula with Bogolyubov-enhanced shell-quenching: Application to r-process. Phys Lett B, 1996, 387: 455-459. (Pubitemid 126406734)
14. Duflo J, Zuker A P. Microscopic mass formulas. Phys Rev C, 1995, 52: R23-R27.
15. Nolen J A, Schiffer J P. Coulomb energies. Ann Rev Nucl Sci, 1969, 19: 471-526.
16. Chen H, Mei H, Meng J, et al. Binding energy differences of mirror nuclei in a time-odd triaxial relativistic mean field approach. Phy Rev C, 2007, 76: 044325.
17. Thoennessen M. Reaching the limits of nuclear stability. Rep Prog Phys, 2004, 67: 1187-1232. (Pubitemid 39072562)
18. Thoennessen M. Exploring the limits of stability. AIP Conf Proc, 2005, 802: 250-257.
19. 49Ni. Phys Rev Lett, 1996, 77: 2893-2896. (Pubitemid 126624165)
20. 100Sn. Phys Rev C, 1995, 52: R2310-R2313. (Pubitemid 126001299)
21. 45Fe. Eur Phys J A, 2002, 14: 279-286.
22. 45Fe. Phys Rev Lett, 2002, 89: 102501.
23. Goldansky V I. On neutron-deficient isotopes of light nuclei and the phenomena of proton and two-proton radioactivity. Nucl Phys, 1960, 19: 482-495.
24. Blank B, Płoszajczak M. Two-proton radioactivity. Rep Prog Phys, 2008, 71: 046301.
25. 54Zn and its decay by two-proton emission. Phys Rev Lett, 2005, 94: 232501.
26. 48Ni. Phys Rev C, 2005, 72: 054315.