National-scale assessment of landslide susceptibility to rank the vulnerability to failure of rock-cut slopes along expressways in Korea

Environmental Earth Sciences

Volumn 63, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 619-632

  Suh, Jangwon ^a   Choi, Yosoon ^b   Roh, Tae Dal ^a   Lee, Hyi Jun ^c   Park, Hyeong Dong ^a  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Seoyeong Engineering Co Ltd   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Analytic hierarchy process (AHP); Expressway; Fuzzy logic; Geographic information systems (GIS); Landslide; Weight of evidence (WOE)

Indexed keywords

ANNUAL COST; EXPRESSWAY; FUZZY LOGIC METHOD; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION; GEOLOGICAL MAP; GIS-DATABASE; HYBRID METHOD; LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY; MULTIPLE FACTORS; SLOPE FAILURE; SLOPE GRADIENTS; SLOPE LENGTH; WARNING SYSTEMS; WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE (WOE);

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; FUZZY LOGIC; FUZZY SYSTEMS; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; LITHOLOGY; RATING; ROCKS; TRAFFIC CONGESTION;

LANDSLIDES;

ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DATABASE; FAILURE ANALYSIS; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; GEOLOGICAL MAPPING; GIS; LANDSLIDE; ROCK MECHANICS; SLOPE FAILURE; TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING; TRAFFIC CONGESTION; VULNERABILITY;

KOREA;

EID: 79955882437     PISSN: 18666280     EISSN: 18666299     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-010-0729-6     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Akgun A, Dag S, Bulut F (2008) Landslide susceptibility mapping for a landslide-prone area (Findikli, NE of Turkey) by likelihood-frequency ratio and weighted linear combination models. Environ Geol 54: 1127-1143.
2. Ayalew L, Yamagishi H, Marui H, Kanno T (2005) Landslides in Sado Island of Japan. Part II. GIS-based susceptibility mapping with comparisons of results from two methods and verifications. Environ Geol 81: 432-445.
3. Bascetin A (2007) A decision support system using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) for the optimal environmental reclamation of an open-pit mine. Environ Geol 52: 663-672.
4. Canuti P, Focardi P, Garzonio CA (1985) Correlation between rainfall and landslides. Bull Eng Geol Environ 32: 49-54.
5. Chacon J, Irigaray C, Fernandez T, El Hamdouni R (2006) Engineering geology maps: landslides and geographical information systems. Bull Eng Geol Environ 65: 341-411.
6. Chen CH, Ke CC, Wang CL (2009) A back-propagation network for the assessment of susceptibility to rock slope failure in the eastern portion of the Southern Cross-Island Expressway in Taiwan. Environ Geol 57: 723-733.
7. Cho H, Lee D (2006) 2004 traffic congestion cost: estimation and trend analysis. The Korea Transport Institute, Policy Research 2006-01, pp 1-23.
8. Cruden DM, Varnes DJ (1996) Landslide types and processes. In: Turner AK, Schuster RL (Eds) Landslides, investigation and mitigation. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Special Report 247. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp 36-75.
9. Dahal RK, Hasegawa S, Nonomura A, Yamanaka M, Masuda T, Nishino K (2008) GIS-based weights-of-evidence modeling of rainfall-induced landslides in small catchments for landslide susceptibility mapping. Environ Geol 54: 311-324.
10. Ercanoglu M, Gokceoglu C (2002) Assessment of landslide susceptibility for a landslide-prone area (north of Yenice, NW Turkey) by fuzzy approach. Environ Geol 41: 720-730.
11. Gomez H, Kavzoglu T (2005) Assessment of shallow landslide susceptibility using artificial neural networks in Jabonosa River Basin, Venezuela. Eng Geol 25: 11-27.
12. Kamp U, Growley BJ, Khattak GA, Owen LA (2008) GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping for the 2005 Kashmir earthquake region. Geomorphology 101: 631-642.
13. Kanungo DP, Arora MK, Sarkar S, Gupta RP (2006) A comparative study of conventional, ANN black box, fuzzy and combined neural and fuzzy weighting procedures for landslide susceptibility zonation in Darjeeling Himalayas. Eng Geol 85: 347-366.
14. Keller EA, Blodgett RH (2007) Natural hazards: Earth's processes as hazards, disasters, and catastrophes. Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
15. Ko Ko C, Flentje P, Chowdhury R (2004) Landslides qualitative hazard and risk assessment method and its reliability. Bull Eng Geol Environ 63: 149-165.
16. Kumar A, Sanoujam M (2007) Landslide studies along the national Expressway (NH39) in Manipur. Nat Hazard 40: 603-614.
17. Lee S (2007) Application and verification of fuzzy algebraic operators to landslide susceptibility mapping. Environ Geol 52: 615-623.
18. Lee S, Talib JA (2005) Probabilistic landslide susceptibility and factor effect analysis. Environ Geol 47: 982-990.
19. Neuhauser B, Terhorst B (2007) Landslide susceptibility assessment using "weights-of-evidence" applied to a study area at the Jurassic escarpment (SW-Germany). Geomorphology 86: 12-24.
20. Oh HJ, Lee S, Chotikasathien W, Kim CH, Kwon JH (2008) Predictive landslide susceptibility mapping using spatial information in the Pechabun area of Thailand. Environ Geol 57: 641-651.
21. Romeo RW, Floris M, Veneri F (2006) Area-scale landslide hazard and risk assessment. Environ Geol 51: 1-13.
22. Saaty TL (1977) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J Math Psychol 15: 234-281.
23. Shang Y, Park HD, Yang Z (2005) Engineering geological zonation using interaction matrix of geological factors: an example from one section of Sichuan-Tibet Expressway. Geosci J 9(4): 375-387.
24. Teoman MB, Topal T, Isik NS (2004) Assessment of slope stability in Ankara clay: a case study along E90 Expressway. Environ Geol 45: 963-977.
25. Yilmaz I (2009) Landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio, logistic regression, artificial neural networks and their comparison: a case study from Kat landslides (Tokat-Turkey). Comput Geosci 35(6): 1125-1138.
26. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. IEEE Inf Control 8: 338-353.