A meta-analysis of information system success: A reconsideration of its dimensionality

International Journal of Accounting Information Systems

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 136-141

  Masoner, Michael M ^a   Lang, Sandra S ^b   Melcher, Arlyn J ^a  

^a SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b School of Business   (Lebanon)

Author keywords

Ease of use; Information quality; Perceived usefulness; Success; System quality; User satisfaction

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955880681     PISSN: 14670895     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.accinf.2010.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Anderson J.C., Gering D.W. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol Bull 1987, 103:411-423.
2. Bollen K.A. Total, direct, and indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological methodology 1987, American Sociological Association, Washington DC. C.C. Clogg (Ed.).
3. Bollen K.A. Structural equations with latent variables 1989, Wiley, New York.
4. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 1988, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale. 2nd ed.
5. Cudeck R. Analysis of correlation matrices using covariance structure models. Psychol Bull 1989, 105:317-327.
6. Duncan O.D. Introduction to structural equation models 1961, Academic, New York.
7. Gnanadesikan R. Methods for statistical data analysis of multivariate observations 1977, Wiley, New York.
8. Hu L., Bentler P.M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model 1999, 6:1-55.
9. Kettinger W.J., Lee C.C. Perceived service quality and user satisfaction. Decis Sci J 1994, 25:737-766.
10. Law K., Wong C., Mobley W.H. Toward a taxonomy of multidimensional constructs. Acad Manage Rev 1998, 23:741-755.
11. Marsh H.W., Hau K.T. Assessing goodness of fit: IS parsimony always desirable?. J Exp Educ 1996, 64:364-390.
12. McHaney R., Cronan T.P. Computer simulation success: On the use of the end-user computing satisfaction. Decis Sci J 1998, 29:525-536.
13. McHaney R., Cronan T.P. A comparison of surrogate success measures in on-going representational decision support systems: An extension to simulation technology. J End User Comput 2001, 13:15.
14. Rubio D.M., Berg-Weger M., Tebb S.S. Using structural equation modeling to test for multidimensionality. Struct Equ Model 2001, 8:613-626.
15. Seddon P.B. A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Inf Syst Res 1997, 8:240-253.
16. Viswesvaran C., Ones D.S. Theory testing: Combining psychometric meta-analysis and structural equations modeling. Pers Psychol 1995, 48:865-885.
17. Wolf F.M. Meta-analysis 1986, Sage, Newbury Park.
18. Wright S. Correlation and Causation. J Agric Res 1921, 20:557-585.