Long-term followup and time to event outcome analysis of continent catheterizable channels

Journal of Urology

Volumn 185, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 2298-2302

  Leslie, Bruno ^a   Lorenzo, Armando J ^a   Moore, Katherine ^a   Farhat, Walid A ^a   Bägli, Darius J ^a   Pippi Salle, Joao L ^a  

^a HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN   (Canada)

Author keywords

child; cystostomy; surgical stomas; urinary catheterization; urinary diversion

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BLADDER CATHETERIZATION; BLADDER EXSTROPHY; BLADDER NECK PLASTY; BLADDER RECONSTRUCTION; CATHETER COMPLICATION; CHILD; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONTINENT CATHETERIZABLE CHANNEL; EPISPADIAS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INFANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; NEUROGENIC BLADDER; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCHOOL CHILD; STOMA; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CYSTOSTOMY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INFANT; MALE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY CATHETERIZATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79955872631     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.02.601     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. C.F. Harris, C.S. Cooper, and J.C. Hutcheson Appendicovesicostomy: the Mitrofanoff procedurea 15-year perspective J Urol 163 2000 1922
2. J.W. Duckett, and A.H. Lotfi Appendicovesicostomy (and variations) in bladder reconstruction J Urol 149 1993 567
3. B. Narayanaswamy, D.T. Wilcox, and P.M. Cuckow The Yang-Monti ileovesicostomy: a problematic channel? BJU Int 87 2001 861
4. J.G. Van Savage, A.E. Khoury, and G.A. McLorie Outcome analysis of Mitrofanoff principle applications using appendix and ureter to umbilical and lower quadrant stomal sites J Urol 156 1996 1794
5. O. Suzer, T.S. Vates, and A.L. Freedman Results of the Mitrofanoff procedure in urinary tract reconstruction in children Br J Urol 79 1997 279
6. H.F. McAndrew, and P.S. Malone Continent catheterizable conduits: which stoma, which conduit and which reservoir? BJU Int 89 2002 86
7. G. Tekant, H. Emir, and E. Eroglu Catheterisable continent urinary diversion (Mitrofanoff principle)clinical experience and psychological aspects Eur J Pediatr Surg 11 2001 263
8. M. Horowitz, C.S. Kuhr, and M.E. Mitchell The Mitrofanoff catheterizable channel: patient acceptance J Urol 153 1995 771
9. B.K. Welk, K. Afshar, and D. Rapoport Complications of the catheterizable channel following continent urinary diversion: their nature and timing J Urol 180 2008 1856
10. P. Mitrofanoff Trans-appendicular continent cystostomy in the management of the neurogenic bladder Chir Pediatr 21 1980 297
11. A. Liard, E. Seguier-Lipszyc, and A. Mathiot The Mitrofanoff procedure: 20 years later J Urol 165 2001 2394
12. J.E. Fishwick, D.C. Gough, and K.J. O'Flynn The Mitrofanoff procedure: does it last? BJU Int 85 2000 496
13. P.R. Monti, R.C. Lara, and M.A. Dutra New techniques for construction of efferent conduits based on the Mitrofanoff principle Urology 49 1997 112
14. J. Lapides, A.C. Diokno, and S.J. Silber Clean, intermittent self-catheterization in the treatment of urinary tract disease J Urol 107 1972 458
15. M.P. Cain, R.C. Rink, and E.B. Yerkes Long-term followup and outcome of continent catheterizable vesicostomy using the Rink modification J Urol 168 2002 2583
16. A. Macedo Jr, T. Rosito, and J.A. Pires A new extra-abdominal channel alternative to the Mitrofanoff principle: experimental and preliminary clinical experience Int Braz J Urol 35 2009 205
17. J.C. Thomas, M.S. Dietrich, and L. Trusler Continent catheterizable channels and the timing of their complications J Urol 176 2006 1816
18. M.P. Cain, A.M. Dussinger, and J. Gitlin Updated experience with the Monti catheterizable channel Urology 72 2008 782
19. J.L. Lemelle, A.K. Simo, and M. Schmitt Comparative study of the Yang-Monti channel and appendix for continent diversion in the Mitrofanoff and Malone principles J Urol 172 2004 1907
20. M.A. Castellan, R. Gosalbez, and A. Labbie Outcomes of continent catheterizable stomas for urinary and fecal incontinence: comparison among different tissue options BJU Int 95 2005 1053
21. L. Piaggio, S. Myers, and T.E. Figueroa Influence of type of conduit and site of implantation on the outcome of continent catheterizable channels J Pediatr Urol 3 2007 230
22. M.K. Farrugia, and P.S. Malone Educational article: the Mitrofanoff procedure J Pediatr Urol 6 2010 330