Robotic pyeloplasty: The university of california-irvine experience

Journal of Urology

Volumn 185, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 2196-2200

  Etafy, Mohamed ^a   Pick, Donald ^a   Said, Shary ^a   Hsueh, Thomas ^a   Kerbl, David ^a   Mucksavage, Phillip ^a   Louie, Michael ^a   McDougall, Elspeth ^a   Clayman, Ralph ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

kidney; laparoscopy; reconstructive surgical procedures; robotics; ureteral obstruction

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; MORPHINE SULFATE;

ADULT; ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY; ARTICLE; BLADDER; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; ECHOGRAPHY; EXTRAVASATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HYDRONEPHROSIS; KIDNEY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; NEPHROSTOMY; OPERATION DURATION; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PNEUMONIA; POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYELOPLASTY; RENOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROBOTICS; STENT; URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION; URINARY TRACT INFECTION;

ADULT; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY PELVIS; MALE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROBOTICS; URETERAL OBSTRUCTION;

EID: 79955864953     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.02.054     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. L. Persky, J.R. Krause, and R.L. Boltuch Initial complications and late results in dismembered pyeloplasty J Urol 118 1977 162
2. F.C. Lowe, and F.F. Marshall Ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adults Urology 23 1984 331
3. T.W. Jarrett, D.Y. Chan, and T.C. Charambura Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: the first 100 cases J Urol 167 2002 1253
4. H.N. Winfield Management of adult ureteropelvic junction obstructionis it time for a new gold standard? J Urol 176 2006 866
5. X. Zhang, H.Z. Li, and X. Ma Retrospective comparison of retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction J Urol 176 2006 1077
6. B.R. Lee, J.A. Cadeddu, and D. Stoianovici Telemedicine and surgical robotics: urologic applications Rev Urol 1 1999 104
7. P. Yohannes, P. Rotariu, and P. Pinto Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic skills: is there a difference in the learning curve? Urology 60 2002 39
8. P.W. Mufarrij, M. Woods, and O.D. Shah Robotic dismembered pyeloplasty: a 6-year, multi-institutional experience J Urol 180 2008 1391
9. R.F. Van Velthoven, T.E. Ahlering, and A. Peltier Technique for laparoscopic running urethrovesical anastomosis: the single knot method Urology 61 2003 699
10. D. Dindo, N. Demartines, and P.A. Clavien Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey Ann Surg 240 2004 205
11. D.S. Dimarco, M.T. Gettman, and S.M. McGee Long-term success of antegrade endopyelotomy compared with pyeloplasty at a single institution J Endourol 20 2006 707
12. G.T. Sung, I.S. Gill, and T.H. Hsu Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a pilot study Urology 53 1999 1099
13. M.T. Gettman, R. Neururer, and G. Bartsch Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty performed using the da Vinci robotic system Urology 60 2002 509
14. W. Bentas, M. Wolfram, and R. Brautigam Da Vinci robot assisted Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty: technique and 1 year follow-up World J Urol 21 2003 133
15. E.S. Weise, and H.N. Winfield Robotic computer-assisted pyeloplasty versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty J Endourol 20 2006 813
16. T.E. Ahlering, D. Skarecky, and D. Lee Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy J Urol 170 2003 1738
17. F. Atug, S.V. Burgess, and E.P. Castle Role of robotics in the management of secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction Int J Clin Pract 60 2006 9