Resolving disputes over reservoir-river operation

Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering

Volumn 137, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 327-339

  Karamouz, Mohammad ^a,d   Akhbari, Masih ^b   Moridi, Ali ^c  

^a POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEHRAN   (Iran)

^c Engineering Research Center and Hydraulics Laboratory   (United States)

^d KHARAZMI UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Artificialneural network.; Dispute resolution; K nearest neighborhood; Nash bargaining theory; System dynamics; Water allocation

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIALNEURAL NETWORK.; DISPUTE RESOLUTION; K-NEAREST NEIGHBORHOODS; NASH BARGAINING; SYSTEM DYNAMICS; WATER ALLOCATION;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; NEURAL NETWORKS; RESERVOIRS (WATER); RIVERS; SYSTEM THEORY; TIME SERIES; WATER QUALITY;

RIVER POLLUTION;

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; COMPUTER SIMULATION; NUMERICAL MODEL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RESERVOIR; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; RIVER POLLUTION; RIVER WATER; THEORETICAL STUDY; WATER QUALITY; WATER USE;

EID: 79955845091     PISSN: 07339437     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000292     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Danesh H.B. Danesh R. Has conflict resolution grown up? Toward new model of decision making and conflict resolution. Int. J. Peace Studies 2002, 7(1):59-76. and ".".
2. Hsu K. Gupta H.V. Sorooshian S. Artificial neural network modeling of the rainfall-runoff process. Water Resour. Res. 1995, 31(10):2517-2530. WRERAQ, 0043-1397, and ".".
3. Karamouz M. Akhbari M. Moridi A. Kerachian R. system dynamics-based conflict resolution model for river water quality management. Int. J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng. 2006, 3(3):147-160. and ".".
4. Karamouz M. Moridi A. Fayyazi H.M. Dealing with conflict over water quality and quantity allocation: case study. Int. J. Scientia Iranica 2008, 15(1):34-49. and ".".
5. Karamouz M. Szidarovszky F. Zahraie B. Water resources systems analysis 2003, and Lewis, Boca Raton, FL.
6. Karlsson M. Yakowitz S. Nearest-neighbor methods for nonparametric rainfall-runoff forecasting. Water Resour. Res. 1987, 23(7):1300-1308. WRERAQ, 0043-1397, and ".".
7. Keyes A.M. Palmer R. The role of object oriented simulation models in the drought preparedness studies. Proc., 20th Annual Specialty Conf. of the ASCE Water Resources Planning and Management Division 1993, 479-482. and "." ASCE, New York.
8. Keyes A.M. Palmer R.N. An assessment of shared vision model effectiveness in water resources planning. Integrated Water Resources Planning for the 21st Century, Proc., 22nd Annual Specialty Conf. of the ASCE Water Resources Planning and Management Division 1995, 532-535. M. F. Dominica, and "." ed., ASCE, Washington, DC.
9. Lord W.B. Wallace M.G. Shillito R.M. Linked models for Indian water right disputes. Managing water-related conflicts: The engineer's role 1990, 180-193. W. Viessman, E. T. Smerdon, and "." and eds., ASCE, NY.
10. Loucks D.P. Analytical aids to conflict management. Managing water-related conflicts: The engineers role 1990, 23-37. W. Viessman, E. T. Smerdon, "." and eds., ASCE, NY.
11. Nandalal K.D. W. Simonovic S.P. Resolving conflicts in water sharing: systemic approach. Water Resour. Res. 2003, 39(12):13-62. WRERAQ, 0043-1397, and ".".
12. Palmer R.N. Keyes A.M. Empowering stakeholders through simulation in water resources planning. Proc., 20th Annual Specialty Conf. of the ASCE Water Resources Planning and Management Division 1993, 451-454. K. Hon, and "." "." ed., ASCE, Washington, DC.
13. Sheer D.P. Baeck M.L. Wright J.R. The computer as negotiator. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 1989, 81(2):68-73. JAWWA5, 0003-150X, and ".".
14. Theissen E.M. Loucks D.P. Computer assisted negotiation of multi-objective water resources conflicts. Water Res. Bull. 1992, 28(1):163-177. LGWBA6, 0043-1370, and ".".
15. Water quality for reservoir-river systems user's manual. 1978, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, "." US Army Corps of Engineers, Institute for Water Resources, Hydrology Engineering Center, Davis, CA.