Investigation into the classification of diseases of sugar beet leaves using multispectral images

Precision Agriculture 2009 - Papers Presented at the 7th European Conference on Precision Agriculture, ECPA 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 229-238

  Bauer, S D ^a   Korc F ^a   Forstner W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Conditional random fields; Leaf diseases; Maximum posterior classification; Pattern recognition; Watershed algorithm

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION METHODS; CLASSIFICATION RESULTS; CONDITIONAL RANDOM FIELD; ILLUMINATION CONDITIONS; LEAF DISEASE; MULTISPECTRAL IMAGES; PRECISION AGRICULTURE; WATER-SHED ALGORITHM;

AGRICULTURE; FUNGI; PATTERN RECOGNITION; RANDOM PROCESSES; SUGAR BEETS;

IMAGE SEGMENTATION;

EID: 79955830983     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Boissard, P., Martin, V. and Moisan, S., 2008. A cognitive vision approach to early pest detection in greenhouse crops. Computers and electronics in agriculture 62: 81-93.
2. Hanan, J.S., Loch, B. and McAleer, T., 2004. Processing laser scanner data to extract structural information. In: Godin, C., Hanan, J., Kurth, W., Lacointe, A., Takenaka, A., Prusinkiewicz, P., DeJong, T., Beveridge, C. and Andrieu, B. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Functional-Structural Plant Models. Proceedings-FSPM04, Montpellier, pp. 9-12.
3. Korč, F. and Förstner, W., 2008. Approximate parameter learning in Conditional Random Fields: An empirical investigation. In G. Rigoll, editor, Pattern Recognition, number 5096 in LNCS, Springer. pp. 1120.
4. Kumar, S. and Hebert, M., 2004. Multiclass discriminative fields for partsbased object detection. In: Snowbird Learning Workshop.
5. Läbe, T. and Förstner, W., 2006. Automatic relative orientation of images. In: Proceedings of the 5th Turkish-German Joint Geodetic Days, March 29th-31st, 2006, Berlin, ISBN 3-9809030-4-4.
6. Lemaire, C., 2008. Aspects of the DSM production with high resolution images. In: Proceedings of the XXIst ISPRS congress, July 3th-11th, 2008, Beijing, China.
7. Pan, Z., Hu, W., Guo, X. and Zhao, C., 2004. An efficient image-based 3D reconstruction algorithm for plants. In: Kanade, T., Kittler, J., Kleinberg, J.M., Mattern, F., Mitchell, J.C., Nierstrasz, O., Pandu Rangan, C., Steffen, B., Sudan, M., Terzopoulos, D., Tygar, D., Vardi, M.Y. and Weikum, G. (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 751-760.
8. Pydipati, R., Burks, T.F., Lee, W.S., 2006. Identification of citrus disease using color texture features and discriminant analysis. In: Computers and electronics in agriculture, 52: 49-59.
9. Li, Stan Z., 2001. Markov random field modeling in image analysis. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.
10. Stuppy, W.H., Maisano, J.A., Colbert, M.W., Rudall, P.J., Rowe, T.B., 2003. Three-dimensional analysis of plant structure using high-resolution X-ray computed tomography. Trends Plant Sci. 8: 2-6.
11. Szeliski, R. et al., 2008. A comparative study of energy minimization methods for markov random fields with smoothness-based priors. In: IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 30(6):1068-1080.
12. Tappen, M. F., Freeman, W. T., 2003. Comparison of graph cuts with belief propagation for stereo, using identical mrf parameters. In: IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.
13. Vincent, L., and Soille, P., 1991. Watersheds in digital spaces: an ancient algorithm based on immersion simulations. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell. 13: 583-598.