Teachers’ professional development: What are the key change factors for mathematics teachers?

European Journal of Teacher Education

Volumn 22, Issue 2-3, 1999, Pages 259-275

  Pehkonen, Erkki ^a   Turner, Günter ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955822034     PISSN: 02619768     EISSN: 14695928     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0261976899020259     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Becker, J.R., Pence, B.J., and Pors, D., 1995. “ Building bridges to mathematics for all A small scale evaluation study ”. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth PME-NA conference, Edited by: Owens, D.T., Reed, M.K., and Millsaps, G.M., Vol. 2, 255–261. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Development.
2. Bottino, R.M., Chiarugi, I., and Furinghetti, F., 1991. “ Teachers’ opinions on maths teaching at ages 14-16 ”. In The Teacher of Mathematics in the Changing World. Proceedings of the 42nd CIEAEM Meeting, Edited by: Ciosek, M., 278–290. Cracow: Institute of Mathematics.
3. Cobb, P., Wood, T., and Yackel, E., 1990. “ Classrooms a learning environment for teachers and researchers ”. In Constructivist Views on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics, Edited by: Davis, R.B., Maher, C.A., and Noddings, N., 125–146. Reston, VA: NCTM. JRME Monograph No. 4
4. Cooney, T.J., and Shealy, B.E., 1995. “ Teachers’ thinking and rethinking assessment practices ”. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth PME-NA'Conference, Edited by: Owens, D/T., Reed, M.K., and Millsaps, G.M., Vol. 2, 109–114. Columbus: OH.
5. Davis, C., 1994. “ Where Did twentieth-century mathematics go wrong? ”. In The Intersection of History and Mathematics Edited by: Chikara, S., Mrrsuo, S., and Dauben, J.W., 129–142. (Basel/Boston/Berlin, Birkhäuser)
6. Davis, R.B., Maher, C.A., and Noddings, N., eds. 1990. ’Constructivist Views on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics., Restoh, VA: NCTM. JRME Mohograph Number 4
7. Davis, N.T., McCarty, B.J., Shaw, K.L, and Sidani-Tabbaa, A., 1993. Transitions from objectivism to constructivism in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 15(6): 627–636.
8. Edwards, T.G., Using a model to understand the process of change in a middle school mathematics teacher. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Indianapolis, IN.
9. Edwards, T.G., 1996. Implications of a model for conceptualizing change in mathematics teachers’ instructional practices. Action in Teacher Education, 18(2): 19–30.
10. Feikes, D., 1995. “ One teacher's learning: a case study of an elementary teacher's beliefs and practice ”. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth PME-NA Conference, Edited by: Owens, D.T., Reed, M.K., and Millsaps, G.M., Vol. 2, 175–180. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
11. Fennema, E., and Franke, M.L., 1992. “ Teachers’ knowledge and its impact ”. In Handbook of Research on Mathematics Learning and Teaching, Edited by: Grouws, D.A., 147–164. New York: Macmillan.
12. Garcia de Galindo, H., 1998. “ Mathematics teacher education: an alternative perspective based on the theory of types ”. In Educating Preservice Mathematics Teachers: Perspectives from Portuguese and North-American Research Experiences, Edited by: Fernandes, D., and Lester, F.K., Lisbon: Instituto de Inovaçâo Educacional.
13. Lerman, S., 1983. Problem-solving or knowledge-centred: the influence of philosophy on mathematics teaching. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technolology, 14(1): 59–66.
14. Lincoln, Y.S., and Guba, E.G., 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
15. Martens, M.L., 1992. Inhibitors to implementing a problem-solving approach to teaching elementary science: case study of a teacher in change. School Science and Mathematics, 92(3): 150–156.
16. Mason, J., 1991. Mathematical problem solving: open, closed and exploratory in the UK. International Reviews on Mathematical Education (ZDM), 23(1): 14–19.
17. Noddings, N., 1990. “ Constructivism in mathematics education ”. In Constructivist Views on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics, Edited by: Davis, R.B., Maher, C.A., and Noddings, N., 7–18. Reston, VA: NCTM. JRME Monograph No. 4
18. Pehkonen, E., and Lepmann, L., 1995. Vergleich der Auffassungen von Lehrern über den Mathematikunterricht in Estland und Finnland, Department of Teacher Education Research Report 139, University of Helsinki.
19. Presmeg,?., 1993. “ Changing visions in mathematics preservice teacher education ”. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth PME-NA Conference, Edited by: Becker, J.R., and Pence, BJ., Vol. 2, 210–216. San Jose, CA: San Jose State University.
20. Preston, R.V., and Lambdin, D.V., 1995. “ Mathematics for all students! Mathematics for all teachers? ”. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth PME-NA Conference, Edited by: Owens, D.T., Reed, M.K., and Millsaps, G.M., Vol. 2, 168–174. Cobumbus, OH: ERIC.
21. Shaw, K.L., Davis, N.T., and McCarty, J., 1991. “ A cognitive framework for teacher change ”. In Proceedings of PME-NA 13, Edited by: Underhill, R.G., Vol. 2, 161–167. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Tech.
22. Shealy, B.E., Arvold, B., Zheng, T., and Cooney, T.J., 1993. “ The evolution of preservice secondary mathematics teachers’ beliefs ”. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth PME-NA Conference, Edited by: Becker, J.R., and Pence, B. J., Vol. 2, 224–230. San Jose, CA: San Jose State University.
23. Sparks, G.M., Inservice education: the process of teacher change. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA.
24. Stacey, K., 1991. Linking application and acquisition of mathematical ideas through problem solving. International Reviews in Mathematical Education (ZDM), 23(1): 8–14.
25. Thompson, A.G., 1992. “ Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: a synthesis of the research ”. In Handbook of Research on Mathematics Learning and Teaching, Edited by: Grouws, D.A., 127–146. New York: Macmillan.
26. Watson, G.A., Middle school mathematics teacher change: social constructivism climbs a step. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Boston, MA.