Estimating common parameters in heterogeneous random effects models

Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference

Volumn 141, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 3181-3192

  Rukhin, Andrew L ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Almost unbiased variance estimator; DerSimonian Laird procedure; Estimating equation; Growth curve model; Maximum likelihood; Meta analysis; Random coefficient model; Variance components

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955809122     PISSN: 03783758     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jspi.2011.04.005     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Beran R. Prediction in random coefficient regression. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 1995, 43:205-213.
2. Bliese P.D., Ployhart R.E. Growth modeling using random coefficient models: model building, testing and illustrations. Organizational Research Methods 2002, 5:362-387.
3. Böhning D., Malzahn U., Dietz E., Schlattmann P., Viwatwongkasem C., Biggeri A. Some general points in estimating heterogeneity variance with the DerSimonian-Laird estimator. Biostatistics 2002, 3:445-457.
4. Demidenko E. Mixed Models 2005, Wiley, New York.
5. DerSimonian R., Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials 1986, 7:177-188.
6. Evans, D., Hornikova, A., Leigh, S., Rukhin, A.L., Strawderman, W., 2009. Report on Key Comparison SIM.AUV.V-K1, Metrologia 46 Technical Supplement 09002.
7. Follmann D.A., Proshan M.A. Valid inference in random effects meta-analysis. Biometrics 1999, 55:732-737.
8. Graybill F.A., Deal R.D. Combining unbiased estimators. Biometrics 1959, 15:543-550.
9. Hall W.J. Efficiency of weighted averages. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 2007, 137:3548-3556.
10. Harville D.A. Matrix Algebra from a Statistician's Perspective 1997, Springer, New York.
11. Horn R.A., Horn S.A., Duncan D.B. Estimating heteroscedastic variance in linear models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1975, 70:380-385.
12. Jackson D., Bowden J., Baker R. How does the DerSimonian and Laird procedure for random effects meta-analysis compare with its more efficient but harder to compute counterparts?. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 2010, 140:961-970.
13. Jiang J. Linear and Generalized Linear Mixed Models and their Applications 2007, Springer, New York.
14. Laird N., Ware J.H. Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics 1982, 38:963-974.
15. Longford N. Random Coefficient Models 1994, Oxford University Press, UK.
16. Mandel J. Estimation of weighting factors in linear regression and analysis of variance. Technometrics 1964, 6:1-25.
17. McCulloch C.E., Searle S. Generalized, Linear and Mixed Models 2001, Wiley, New York.
18. Pan J.X., Fang K.T. Growth Curve Models and Statistical Diagnostics 2002, Springer, New York.
19. Paule, R.C., Mandel, J. 1971. Analysis of interlaboratory measurements on the vapor pressure of cadmium and silver. National Bureau of Standards Special Publication, 260-21.
20. Pinheiro J., Bates D. Mixed Effects Models in S and S-Plus 2000, Springer, New York.
21. Robinson G.K. That BLUP is a good thing: the estimation of random effects. Statistical Science 1991, 6:15-32.
22. Rukhin A.L. Estimating common vector mean in interlaboratory studies. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 2007, 98:434-435.
23. Searle S. Built-in-restrictions on best linear predictors (BLUP) of random effects in mixed models. American Statistician 1997, 51:19-21.
24. Serridge M., Licht T.R. Piezoelectric Accelerometer and Vibration Preamplifier Handbook 1987, Larsen&Son, Denmark.