The contents of visual working memory reduce uncertainty during visual search

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 73, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 996-1002

  Cosman, Joshua D ^a   Vecera, Shaun P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Attentional capture; Enhancement; Perceptual processing; Uncertainty; Visual attention; Visual working memory

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; COLOR VISION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; SHORT TERM MEMORY; UNCERTAINTY;

ASSOCIATION; COLOR PERCEPTION; CUES; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; UNCERTAINTY;

EID: 79955803939     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: 1943393X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13414-011-0093-y     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436.
2. Carrasco, M., Ling, S., & Read, S. (2004). Attention alters appearance. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 308-313.
3. Cousineau, D. (2005). Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson's method. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 1, 42-45.
4. Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193-222.
5. Dosher, B., & Lu, Z.-L. (2000). Noise exclusion in spatial cueing of attention. Psychological Science, 11, 139-146.
6. Downing, P. E. (2000). Interactions between visual working memory and selective attention. Psychological Science, 11, 467-473.
7. Emrich, S. M., Al-Aidroos, N., Pratt, J., & Ferber, S. (2010). Finding memory in search: The effect of visual working memory load on visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 1457-1466.
8. Eriksen, C. W., & Spencer, T. (1969). Rate of information processing in visual perception: Some results and methodological considerations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 79, 1-16.
9. Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
10. Kastner, S., de Weerd, P., Desimone, R., & Ungerleider, L. G. (1998). Mechanisms of directed attention to human extrastriate cortex as revealed by functional MRI. Science, 282, 108-111.
11. Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476-490.
12. Luck, S. J., Hillyard, S. A., Mouloua, M., & Hawkins, H. L. (1996). Mechanisms of visual-spatial attention: Resource allocation or uncertainty reduction? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 725-773.
13. Moore, C. M., & Egeth, H. (1998). How does feature-based visual attention affect visual processing? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1296-1310.
14. Olivers, C. N. L., Meijer, F., & Theeuwes, J. (2006). Feature-based, memory-driven attentional capture: Visual working-memory content affects visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1243-1265.
15. Palmer, J. (1994). Set-size effects in visual search: The effect of attention is independent of the stimulus for simple tasks. Vision Research, 34, 1703-1721.
16. Palmer, J. (1995). Attention in visual search: Distinguishing four causes of a set-size effect. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 118-123.
17. Reynolds, J. H., Chelazzi, L., & Desimone, R. (1999). Competitive mechanisms subserve attention in macaque areas V2 and V4. The Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 1736-1753.
18. Shiu, L., & Pashler, H. (1994). Negligible effect of spatial precueing on identification of single digits. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1037-1054.
19. Soto, D., Heinke, D., Humphreys, G. W., & Blanco, M. J. (2005). Early, involuntary top-down guidance of attention from working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 248-261.
20. Soto, D., Wriglesworth, A., Bahrami-Balani, A., & Humphreys, G. W. (2010). Working memory enhances visual perception: Evidence from signal detection analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 441-456.
21. Theeuwes, J. (2010). Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. Acta Psychologica, 123, 77-99.
22. Theeuwes, J., & van der Burg, E. (2007). The role of spatial and non-spatial information in visual selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1335-1351.
23. Treisman, A. (1988). Features and objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 201-237.
24. Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
25. Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2007). Do the contents of automatically influence attentional selection during visual search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 363-376.
26. Yeshurun, Y., & Carrasco, M. (1999). Spatial attention improves performance in spatial resolution tasks. Vision Research, 39, 293-306.
27. Zhang, J., & Mueller, S. T. (2005). A note on ROC analysis and non-parametric estimates of sensitivity. Psychometrika, 70, 145-154.