An ERP study on the time course of facial trustworthiness appraisal

Neuroscience Letters

Volumn 496, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 147-151

  Yang, Dong ^a   Qi, Senqing ^a   Ding, Cody ^a,b   Song, Yan ^a  

^a SOUTHWEST UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI ST LOUIS   (United States)

Author keywords

C1; Event related potentials; Face; LPC; Trustworthiness

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BRAIN FUNCTION; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; EMOTIONALITY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FACIES; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; MOTIVATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; TRUST;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EMOTIONS; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FACE; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; GENERALIZATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; TRUST; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79955781063     PISSN: 03043940     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.03.066     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Clark V.P., Fan S., Hillyard S.A. Identification of early visual evoked potential generators by retinotopic and topographic analyses. Hum. Brain Mapp. 1995, 2:170-187.
2. Compton R.J. The interface between emotion and attention: a review of evidence from psychology and neuroscience. Behav. Cogn. Neurosci. Rev. 2003, 2:115-129.
3. Cosmides L., Toobey J. The cognitive neuroscience of social reasoning. The New Cognitive Neuroscience 2000, 1259-1276. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. M.S. Gazzaniga (Ed.).
4. Eldar S., Yankelevitch R., Lamy D., Bar-Haim Y. Enhanced neural reactivity and selective attention to threat in anxiety. Biol. Psychol. 2010, 85:252-257.
5. Engell A.D., Haxby J.V., Todorov A. Implicit trustworthiness decisions: automatic coding of face properties in human amygdale. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2007, 19:1508-1519.
6. Honekopp J. Once more: is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Relative contributions of private and shared taste to judgments of facial attractiveness. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2006, 32:199-209.
7. Huang Y.X., Luo Y.J. Temporal course of emotional negativity bias: an ERP study. Neurosci. Lett. 2006, 398(1):91-96.
8. Ito T.A., Larsen J.T., Smith N.K., Cacioppo J.T. Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: the negativity bias in evaluative categorizations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1998, 75:887-900.
9. Kenemans J.L., Baas J.M., Mangun G.R., Lijffijt M., Verbaten M.N. On the processing of spatial frequencies as revealed by evoked-potential source modeling. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2000, 111:1113-1123.
10. Knutson B. Facial expressions of emotion influence interpersonal trait inferences. J. Nonverb. Behav. 1996, 20:165-181.
11. Langeslag S.J.E., Jansma B.M., Franken I.H.A., Van Strien J.W. Event-related potential responses to love-related facial stimuli. Biol. Psychol. 2007, 76:109-115.
12. Mangun G.R., Hillyard S.A., Luck S.J. Electrocortical substrates of visual selective attention. Attention and Performance 1993, 219-243. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press. D. Meyer, S. Kornblum (Eds.).
13. Montepare J.M., Dobish H. The contribution of emotion perceptions and their overgeneralizations to trait impressions. J. Nonverb. Behav. 2003, 27:237-254.
14. Oosterhof N.N., Todorov A. The functional basis of face evaluation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105:11087-11092.
15. Pourtois G., Grandjean D., Sander D., Vuilleumier P. Electrophysiological correlates of rapid spatial orienting towards fearful faces. Cereb. Cortex 2004, 14:619-633.
16. Schupp H.T., Cuthbert B.N., Bradley M.M., Cacioppo J.T., Ito T., Lang P.J. Affective picture processing: the late positive potential is modulated by motivational relevance. Psychophysiology 2000, 37:257-261.
17. Schupp H.T., hman A.Ö., Junghöfer M., Weike A.I., Stockburger J., Hamm A.O. The facilitated processing of threatening faces: an ERP analysis. Emotion 2004, 4:189-200.
18. Schupp H.T., Cuthbert B.N., Bradley M.M., Hillman C.H., Hamm A.O., Lang P.J. Brain processes in emotional perception: motivated attention. Cogn. Emotion 2004, 18:593-611.
19. Stirrat M., Perrett D.I. Valid facial cues to cooperation and trust: male facial width and trustworthiness. Psychol. Sci. 2010, 21:349-354.
20. Stolarova M., Keil A., Moratti S. Modulation of the C1 visual event-related component by conditioned stimuli: evidence for sensory plasticity in early affective perception. Cereb. Cortex 2006, 16:876-887.
21. Todorov A., Baron S., Oosterhof N.N. Evaluating face trustworthiness: a model based approach. Soc. Cogn. Affect Neurosci. 2008, 3:119-127.
22. Todorov A., Said C.P., Engell A.D., Oosterhof N.N. Understanding evaluation of faces on social dimensions. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2008, 12:455-460.
23. Todorov A., Pakrashi M., Oosterhof N.N. Evaluating faces on trustworthiness after minimal time exposure. Soc. Cogn. 2009, 27:813-833.
24. van't Wout M., Sanfey A.G. Friend or foe: the effect of implicit trustworthiness judgments in social decision-making. Cognition 2008, 108:796-803.
25. Willis J., Todorov A. First impressions: making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychol. Sci. 2006, 17:592-598.
26. Winston J.S., Strange B.A., O'Doherty J., Dolan R.J. Automatic and intentional brain responses during evaluation of trustworthiness of faces. Nat. Neurosci. 2002, 5:277-283.