Coreference and meaning

Philosophical Studies

Volumn 154, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 301-324

  Angel Pinillos N ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Coreference; De jure coreference; Knowledge of reference; Meaning; Reference; Semantic relationism; Semantic relations

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955778605     PISSN: 00318116     EISSN: 15730883     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11098-010-9543-y     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Asher, N. (1986). Belief in discourse representation theory. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 15(2), 127-129.
2. Bach, K. (1994). Thought and reference. Oxford: Clarendon.
3. Benacerraf, P. (1965). What numbers could not be. The Philosophical Review, 74(1), 47-73.
4. Büring, D. (2005). Binding theory. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
5. Campbell, J. (1987). Functional role and truth conditions: Is sense transparent. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume LXI, 273-292.
6. Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
7. Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Donnellan, K. (1966). Reference and definite descriptions. Philosophical Review, 75(3), 281-304.
9. Evans, G. (1980). Pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 11(2), 337-362.
10. Fiengo, R., & May, R. (1994). Indices and identity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Fiengo, R., & May, R. 1998. Names and Expressions. Journal of Philosophy, XCV(8), 18.
12. Fiengo, R., & May, R. (2006). De Lingua belief. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Fine, K. (2003). The role of variables. The Journal of Philosophy, 100, 605-610.
14. Fine, K. (2007). Semantic relationism. Oxford: Blackwell.
15. Frege, G. (1892). On sense and reference. (Reprinted from Translations from the philosophical writings of Gottlob Frege, by P. Geach & M. Black, Eds., 1960, Oxford: Blackwell).
16. Groenendijk, J., Stokhof, M., & Veltman, F. (1996). Coreference and modality. In S. Lappin (Ed.), Handbook of contemporary semantic theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
17. Heim, I. (1982). The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases, Dissertation, U. Mass, Amherst, published in 1989 (Garland Press).
18. Heim, I. (1983). File change semantics and the familiarity theory of definiteness. In R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze, & A. von Stechow (Eds.), Meaning use and interpretation of language. Berlin: de Gruyter.
19. Heim, I. (1998). Anaphora and semantic interpretation: A reinterpretation of Reinhart's approach. In U. Sauerland & O. Percus (Eds.), The interpretive tract (Vol. 25). Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
20. Heim, I., & Kratzer, A. (1998). Semantics in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
21. Higginbotham, J. (1980). Pronouns and bound variables. Linguistic Inquiry, 11(4), 679-708.
22. Higginbotham, J. (1983). Logical form, binding and nominals. Linguistic Inquiry, 14, 395-420.
23. Higginbotham, J. (1985). On semantics. Linguistic Inquiry, 16, 547-593.
24. Huang, Y. (2000). Anaphora: A cross linguistic approach. New York: Oxford.
25. Jacobson, P. (1999). Towards a variable free semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy, 22, 117-184.
26. Kamp, H. (1981). A theory of truth and semantic interpretation. In J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen, & M. Stokhof (Eds.), Formal methods in the study of language Part I. Amsterdam: Mathematisch Centrum, University of Amsterdam.
27. Kamp, H. (1985). Context, thought and communication. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 85, 239-261.
28. Kaplan, D. (1989a). Demonstratives. In J. Almog, J. Perry, & H. Wettstein (Eds.), Themes from Kaplan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Kaplan, D. (1989b). Afterthoughts. In J. Almog, J. Perry, & H. Wettstein (Eds.), Themes from Kaplan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30. Karttunen, L. (1976). Discourse referents. In J. McCawley (Ed.), Notes from the linguistic underground (Syntax and semantics, Vol. 7). New York: Academic Press.
31. Keenan, E. (1971). Names, quantifiers and the sloppy identity problem. Papers in Linguistics, 4, 211-232.
32. Kripke, S. (1977). Speaker reference and semantic reference. In P. A. French, T. E. Uehling Jr., & H. K. Wettstein (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives in the philosophy of language. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
33. Larson, G., & Segal, G. (1995). Knowledge of meaning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. Lasnik, H. (1976). Remarks on coreference. Linguistic Analysis, 2, 1-23.
35. Lawlor, K. (2001). New thoughts about old things: Cognitive policies as the ground of singular concepts. New York: Garland Publishing.
36. Lawlor, K. (2002). Memory, anaphora and content preservation. Philosophical Studies, 109, 97-119.
37. Mitkov, R. (2002). Anaphora resolution. London: Longman (Pearson Education).
38. Montague, R. (1974). The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English. In R. Montague (Ed.), Formal philosophy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
39. Muskens, R. (1996). Combining Montague semantics and discourse representation. Linguistics and Philosophy, 19, 143-186.
40. Neale, S. (2005). Pragmatism and binding. In Z. G. Szabó (Ed.), Semantics versus pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41. Parsons, C. (1965). Frege's theory of number, mathematics in philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
42. Parsons, C. (1990). The structuralist views of mathematical objects. Synthese, 84, 303-346.
43. Pettit, D. (2002). Why knowledge is unnecessary for understanding language. Mind, 111(3), 519-550.
44. Postal, P. (1965). On so-called pronouns in English. In F. Dinneen (Ed.), 19th monograph on languages and linguistics. Cambridge, MA: Georgetown.
45. Quine, W. V. (1960). Variables explained away. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 104, 343-347.
46. Quine, W. V. (1979). Mathematical logic (revised edition). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47. Reinhart, T. (1983). Anaphora and semantic interpretation. Chicago: University of Chicago.
48. Reinhart, T. (2000). Strategies of anaphora resolution. In H. Bennis, M. Everaert, & E. Reuland (Eds.), Interface strategies. Amsterdam: Royal Academy of Arts and Sciences.
49. Richard, M. (1987). Quantification and Leibniz's law. The Philosophical Review., 96(4), 555-578.
50. Russell, B. (1905). On denoting. Mind, 14, 479-493.
51. Salmon, N. (1986). Frege's puzzle. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview.
52. Salmon, N. (2006). A theory of bondage. The Philosophical Review, 115(4), 117-134.
53. Shapiro, S. (1997). Philosophy of mathematics: Structure and ontology. New York: Oxford University Press.
54. Soames, S. (1988). Direct reference, propositional attitudes and semantic content. In S. Salmon & S. Soames (Eds.), Propositions and attitudes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55. Soames, S. (1994). Attitudes and anaphora. Philosophical Perspectives, 8, 251-272.
56. Soames, S. (2002). Beyond rigidity. New York: Oxford University Press.
57. Stalnaker, R. (2002). Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy, 25(5-6), 701-721.
58. Taylor, K. (2003). Reference and the rational mind. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
59. von Heusinger, K. (2002). Reference and representation of pronouns. In H. Simon & H. Wiese (Eds.), Pronouns-Grammar and representation. Amsterdam, PA: John Benjamins.