Segmentation of lumbar vertebrae using part-based graphs and active appearance models

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5762 LNCS, Issue PART 2, 2009, Pages 1017-1024

  Roberts, Martin G ^a   Cootes, Tim F ^a   Pacheco, Elisa ^a   Oh, Teik ^a   Adams, Judith E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE APPEARANCE MODELS; AUTOMATIC METHOD; CLINICAL DATA; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY; GEOMETRIC CONSTRAINT; GLOBAL SEARCH; GOLD STANDARDS; GRAPHICAL MODEL; LOOPY BELIEF PROPAGATION; LUMBAR SPINES; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MANUAL ANNOTATION; MINIMUM COST; MULTI-RESOLUTIONS; OPTIMISATIONS; POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS; SECOND PHASE; VERTEBRAL FRACTURES;

COMPUTER VISION; DATA FLOW ANALYSIS; FACE RECOGNITION; FRACTURE; RADIOGRAPHY;

MEDICAL COMPUTING;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; METHODOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MODELS, ANATOMIC; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 79955777796     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-04271-3_123     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. Guermazi, A., Mohr, A., Grigorian, M., Taouli, B., Genant, H.K.: Identification of vertebral fractures in osteoporosis. Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology 6(3), 241-252 (2002)
2. de Bruijne, M., Lund, M.T., Tankó, L.B., Pettersen, P.P., Nielsen, M.: Quantitative vertebral morphometry using neighbor-conditional shape models. In: Larsen, R., Nielsen, M., Sporring, J. (eds.) MICCAI 2006. LNCS, vol. 4190, pp. 1-8. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
3. Roberts, M.G., Cootes, T.F., Pacheco, E.M., Adams, J.E.: Quantitative vertebral fracture detection on DXA images using shape and appearance models. Academic Radiology 14, 1166-1178 (2007)
4. Cootes, T.F., Edwards, G.J., Taylor, C.J.: Active appearance models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 23, 681-685 (2001)
5. Roberts, M.G., Cootes, T.F., Adams, J.E.: Vertebral morphometry: semi-automatic determination of detailed shape from DXA images using active appearance models. Investigative Radiology 41(12), 849-859 (2006)
6. de Bruijne, M., Nielsen, M.: Image segmentation by shape particle filtering. In: International Conference on Pattern Recognition, pp. 722-725. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2004)
7. Fergus, R., Perona, P., Zisserman, A.: A visual category filter for google images. In: Pajdla, T., Matas, J(G.) (eds.) ECCV 2004. LNCS, vol. 3021, pp. 242-256. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
8. Felzenszwalb, P., Huttenlocher, D.: Pictorial structures for object recognition. Int. Journal of Computer Vision 61(1), 55-79 (2005)
9. Ponce, J., Hebert, M., Schmid, C., Zisserman, A. (eds.): Towards Category-Level Object Recognition. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
10. Donner, R., Micusik, B., Langs, G., Bischof, H.: Sparse MRF appearance models for fast anatomical structure localisation. In: Proc. British Machine Vision Conference, vol. 2, pp. 1080-1089 (2007)
11. Weiss, Y., Freeman, W.: On the optimality of solutions of the max-product belief propagation algorithm in arbitrary graphs. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 47, 736-744 (2001)