Understanding physical factors associated with participation in community ambulation following stroke

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 33, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 1033-1042

  Robinson, Cynthia A ^a   Shumway Cook, Anne ^a   Matsuda, Patricia Noritake ^a   Ciol, Marcia A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Mobility; participation; stroke

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CONSTRUCTION WORK AND ARCHITECTURAL PHENOMENA; CONSUMER; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DEPRESSION; DISABILITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MENTAL CAPACITY; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SELF CONCEPT; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE; SOCIAL WELFARE; STROKE; TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORT; WALKING DIFFICULTY;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; ARCHITECTURAL ACCESSIBILITY; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; DATA COLLECTION; DEPRESSION; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL COMPETENCY; MIDDLE AGED; MOBILITY LIMITATION; NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SELF EFFICACY; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE; SOCIAL WELFARE; STROKE; TRANSPORTATION;

EID: 79955746329     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: 14645165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2010.520803     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. American Heart Association. Heart disease and stroke statistics - 2009 update at a glance. Electronic citation. http:// www.americanheart.org/ downloadable/heart/1240250946756 LS-1982HeartandStrokeUpdate.042009.pdf. Last accessed 29 January 2010.
2. Pound P, Gompertz P, Ebrahim S. A patient-centered study of the consequences of stroke. Clin Rehabil 1998;12: 338-347.
3. Perry J, Garrett M, Gronley JK, Mulroy SJ. Classification of walking handicap in the stroke population. Stroke 1995;26: 982-989.
4. Keenan MA, Perry J, Jordan C. Factors affecting balance and ambulation following stroke. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1984; 182:165-171. (Pubitemid 14182856)
5. Lord SE, McPherson K, McNaughton HK, Rochester L, Weatherall M. Community ambulation after stroke: how important and obtainable is it and what measure appear predictive? Arch of Phys Med Rehabil 2004;86:234-239. (Pubitemid 38182566)
6. Hill K, Ellis P, Bernhardt J, Maggs P, Hull S. Balance and mobility outcomes for stroke patients: a comprehensive audit. Aust J Physiother 1997;43:173-180. (Pubitemid 27424879)
7. Shumway-Cook A, Patla AE, Stewart A, Ferrucci L, Ciol MA, Guralnik JM. Environmental demands associated with community mobility in older adults with and without mobility disabilities. Phys Ther 2002;82:670-681. (Pubitemid 34728977)
8. Shumway-Cook A, Guralnik JM, Phillips CL, Coppen AK, Ciol MA, Bandinelli S, Ferrucci L. Age-associated declines in complex walking task performance: the Walking InCHIANTI toolkit. J Am Geriatr Soc 2007;55:58-65. (Pubitemid 46046229)
9. Frank JS, Patla AE. Balance and mobility challenges in older adults: implications for preserving community mobility. Am J Prev Med 2003;25:157-163. (Pubitemid 41116510)
10. Collen FM, Wade DT, Bradshaw CM. Mobility after stroke: reliability of measures of impairment and disability. Int Disabil Stud 1990;12:6-9. (Pubitemid 20300158)
11. Forlander DA, Bohannon RW. Rivermead Mobility Index: a brief review of research to date. Clin Rehabil 1999;13:97-100. (Pubitemid 29171404)
12. Berg KO, Wood-Dauphinee SL, Williams JI, Maki B. Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument. Can J Pub Health 1992;83(Suppl 2):S7-S11. (Pubitemid 23017045)
13. Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther 1987;67: 206-207. (Pubitemid 17026064)
14. Palmer ML, Epler M. Fundamentals of musculoskeletal assessment techniques. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott- Raven Publishers; 1998.
15. Trudelle-Jackson E, Jackson AW, Frankowski CM, Long KM,Meske NB. Interdevice reliability and validity assessment of the Nicholas Hand-Held Dynamometer. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1994;20:302-306. (Pubitemid 24373490)
16. O'Sullivan SB, Schmitz TJ, editors. Physical rehabilitation. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: FA Davis Company; 2007.
17. Andrews AW, Bohannon RW. Distribution of muscle strength impairments following stroke. Clin Rehabil 2000;14:79-87. (Pubitemid 30072225)
18. Patterson SL, Forrester LW, Rodgers MM, Ryan AS, Ivey FM, Sorkin JD, Macko RF. Determinants of walking function after stroke: differences by deficit severity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88:115-119. (Pubitemid 46039764)
19. Michael KM, Allen JK, Macko RF. Reduced ambulatory activity after stroke: the role of balance, gait and cardiovascular fitness. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:1552-1556. (Pubitemid 41115816)
20. Kollen B, van de Port I, Lindeman E, Twisk J, Kwakkel G. Predicting improvement in gait after stroke: a longitudinal prospective study. Stroke 2005;36:2676-2680.
21. Lu T, Yen HC, Chen H, Hsu WC, Chen SC, Hong SW, Jeng JS. Symmetrical kinematic changes in highly functioning older patients post stroke during obstacle crossing. Gait Posture 2010;31:511-516.
22. Said CM, Galea M, Lythgo N. Obstacle crossing performance does not differ between the first and subsequent attempts in people with stroke. Gait Posture 2009;30:455-458.
23. Lord SE, Rochester L, Weatherall M, McPherson KM, McNaughton HK. The effect of environment and task on gait parameters after stroke: a randomized comparison of measurement conditions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87: 967-973. (Pubitemid 43927567)