Renegotiating the great lakes water quality agreement: The process for a sustainable outcome

Sustainability

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 254-267

  Krantzberg, Gail ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Great lakes; Public engagement; Sustainability; Treaty negotiation; Water resource management

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955743213     PISSN: 20711050     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/su1020254     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement. 1987. Canada and the United States. Available online: http://www.ijc.org/rel/agree/quality.html (accessed May 17, 2008).
2. Krantzberg, G. The Great Lakes, A 35th Year Anniversary: Time to Look Forward. Electronic Green J. 2008, 26. Available online: http://egj.lib.uidaho.edu/index.php/egj/article/view/3213 (accessed April, 2009).
3. Agreement Review Committee 2007. Report to the Great Lakes Binational Executive Committee: Volume 1. Available online: www.binational.net (accessed April, 2009).
4. Harvey, K. Monitoring Change: Citizen Science and International Environmental Treaty-Making. International Environmental Negotiation: Ensuring a Sustainable Future 2006, 15, 77-90.
5. Susskind, L. Environmental Diplomacy: Negotiating More Effective Global Agreements. Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1994.
6. Andresen, S.; Underdal A.; Wettestad, J. Science and Politics in International Environmental Regimes. Manchester University Press: Manchester, UK, 2000.
7. Wapner, P. Environmental Activism and World Civil Politics. SUNY Press: New York, NY, USA, 1996.
8. Highum, E. Remarks Presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, Town & Country Resort and Convention Center, San Diego, CA, USA, March 22, 2006.
9. Kriebel, D.J.; Tickner, P.; Epstein, J.; Lemons, R.; Levins, E.L.; Loechler, M.; Quinn, R.; Rudel, T.; Schettler; Stoto, M. The Precautionary Principle in Environmental Science. Environ. Healt. Perspectiv. 2001, 109, 871-876.
10. Wilson, D.C. Clearly Recognized and Suitably Porous: A Review of the Literature on the Science-Policy Interface in International Environmental Management. Deliverable no. 1 for SAFMAMS - Scientific Advice for Fisheries Management at Multiple Scales, EU FP6 project no. 013639. Working paper no 1-2007. Institute for Fisheries Management & Coastal Community Development: Denmark.
11. Krantzberg, G. Dofasco Centre for Engineering and Public Policy. Presented at Science - policy futures workshop, McMaster University, Canada, May 18, 2006.
12. Turner, J.F. Presented at Assistant Secretary of State for Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs Testimony before a Joint Hearing of the Committee on Environment and Public Works and the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, Washington, DC, USA, July 24, 2002.
13. CBTa (2008). Available online: http://www.cbt.org/about/main.asp?fl=3&pg=treaty (accessed April, 2009).
14. CBTb (2008). Available online: http://www.cbt.org/water/texts/ColumbiaRiverTreatyBrochure.pdf (accessed April, 2009).
15. Krantzberg, G.; Manno, J.; de Boer, C. Great Lakes St. Lawrence River Governance: EXPERT Workshop. Presented at the Expert Workshop on Great Lakes St, Lawrence River Governance Convened, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2008.
16. Burchfield, J.; McKinney, M. The Columbia River Treaty. Available online: http://www.umtpri.org/documents/nrcr_program/Practicum_2008.pdf (accessed March, 2009).
17. Manning, A.D.; Lindenmayer, D.B.; Fischer, J. Stretch Goals and Backcasting: Approaches for Overcoming Barriers to Large-Scale Ecological Restoration. Restor. Ecol. 2006, 14, 487-492.
18. Thompson, R.C. Status Report of the Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development to the House of Commons. Presented at the Commissioner's Perspective-2008. Office of the Auditor General: Ottawa, Canada, 2008.
19. International Joint Commission. Status of Restoration Activities in the Great Lakes Areas of Concern. Available online: http://www.ijc.org/php/publications/html/aoc_rep/english/report/pdfs/chapter1-e.pdf (accessed April, 2003).
20. Vigmostad, K.; Mays, N.; Hance, A.; Cangelosi, A. Large-Scale Ecosystem Restoration: Lessons for Existing and Emerging Initiatives. Northeast-Midwest Institute, Washington, DC, USA, 2005.
21. Kingdon, J. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, 2nd ed.; Longman: New York, NY, USA, 1995.
22. CGLG (Council of Great Lakes Governers). Great Lakes - St. Lawrence River Basin Sustainable Water Resources Agreement. Available online: http://www.cglg.org (accessed March, 2009).
23. Zartman, I.W. Ripeness. Available online: http://www.beyondintractability.org/essay/ripeness/ (accessed March, 2009).
24. AFSME (2008). Available online: http://www.afscme.org/publications/9684.cfm (accessed March, 2005).
25. Fisher, R.; Ury, W.L. Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In, 2nd ed.; Houghton Mifflin Harcourt: Boston, MA, USA, 1991.
26. Good Timing-Identifying "Ripe" Times for Negotiations. Available online: http://www.colorado.edu/conflict/peace/treatment/idripe.htm (accessed March, 2009).
27. Interest-Based Bargaining. Available online: http://www.afscme.org/publications/9684.cfm (accessed March, 2009).
28. Competitive and Integrative Approaches. Available online: http://www.internetmediator.com/medres/pg25.cfm (accessed March, 2009).
29. Spector, B.M. Motivating Water Diplomacy: Finding the Situational Incentives to Negotiate - The Conditions for Negotiation and Cooperation. Int. Negotiation 2000, 5, 223-236.
30. Maiese, M. Negotiation. Available online: http://www.beyondintractability.org/essay/negotiation/ (accessed March, 2009).
31. Lewicki, R.J.; Saunders, D.M.; Minton, J.W. Negotiation, 3rd ed.; Stanford University Press: San Francisco, USA, 1999; p. 5.
32. Hinkey, L.M.; Ellenberg, K.T.; Kessler, B. Strategies for engaging scientists in collaborative processes. J. Ext. 2005, 43, 1-3.
33. Day, J.C.; Gunton, T.I.; Frame, T.M. Towards environmental sustainability in British Columbia: The role of collaborative planning. Environments 2003, 31, 21-38.
34. Armour, A.M. Risk assessment in environmental policymaking. Policy Stud. Rev. 1993, 12, 178-196.
35. Beierle, T.J. Using social goals to evaluate public participation in environmental decisions. Policy Stud. J. 1999, 3, 75-103.
36. Fiorino, D.J. Citizen participation and environmental risk: A survey of institutional mechanisms. Sci. Technol. Hum. Val. 1990, 15, 226-243.
37. Isaacson, P. Pollution regulation and public sensibility. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 1986, 6, 229-232.
38. Hagendijk, R.; Irwin, A. Public Deliberation and Governance: Engaging With Science and Technology in Contemporary Europe. Minerva 2006, 44, 167-184.
39. Jolley, G.J. Public Involvement Tools in Environmental Decision-Making: A Primer for Practitioners. J. Ext. 2007, 45, 2-3.
40. Mendelsohn, M.; McLean, J. 'Values and Interests in Attitudes toward Trade and Globalization: The Continuing Compromise of Embedded Liberalism,' in Ruggie; John Gerard, Ed.; Ashgate Publishing: Farnham, Surrey, UK, 2008.
41. Donahue, M.J. The case for good government: why a comprehensive review of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement is needed. Toledo Journal of Great Lakes' Law, Science & Policy 1999, 2, 1-11.
42. Great Lakes Forever. Available online: http://www.greatlakesforever.org/ (accessed April, 2009).