TMP long fibres as reinforcement pulp. Part 1. Laboratory tests

Nordic Pulp and Paper Research Journal

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 328-339

  Lehto, Jouko ^a   Hiltunen, Eero ^b   Paulapuro, Hannu ^b  

^a UPM Research Center   (Finland)

^b NONE   (Finland)

Author keywords

Chemical pulp; Fracture energy; Mechanical pulp; Refining; Reinforcement; Rejects; Sulfonation; Zero span tensile strength

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL BONDS; CHEMICAL PULP; FIBERS; FRACTURE; FRACTURE ENERGY; MECHANICAL PULP; PULP REFINING; REFINING; REINFORCEMENT; STIFFNESS; SULFONATION; THERMOMECHANICAL PULPING PROCESS; WOOD PRESERVATION;

FIBRE DIMENSIONS; FURTHER TREATMENTS; LABORATORY TEST; MECHANICAL REINFORCEMENT; REINFORCEMENT PULP; REJECTS; TENSILE STIFFNESS; ZERO-SPAN TENSILE STRENGTH;

TENSILE STRENGTH;

CHEMICAL PULPS; FRACTURE; MECHANICAL PULPS; REFINING; REINFORCEMENT; REJECTS; STIFFNESS; SULFONATION; TENSILE STRENGTH; THERMOMECHANICAL PULPS; WOOD PRESERVATION;

EID: 79955738031     PISSN: 02832631     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3183/npprj-2010-25-03-p328-339     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Fernando, D. (2007): Ultrastructural characterization (morphological and topochemical) of wood pulp fibres; Effects of mechanical and kraft processes. Doctoral Thesis. Swedish niversity of Agricultural Sciences. Upsala, Sweden.
2. Gavelin, G. (1980) A single TMP furnish - the Monopulp process. Pulp Pap. Int. 22(13), 54.
3. Gummerus, M., Rath, B. (1986): Sulphite treatment of TMP rejects. Part 2. Effect of different treatment conditions and refining on the properties of reject pulp. Paperi Puu 68(4), 269.
4. Gurnagul, N., Page, D.H. (1989): The difference between dry and rewetted zero-span tensile strength. Tappi J 82(12), 164.
5. Heitner, C., Atack, D., Karnis, A. (1982):, Ultra-high yield pulping of eastern black spruce. Part 3. Interstage sulfonation. Svensk Papperstidning 58(12), R 78.
6. Hiltunen, E. (2003): On the beating of reinforcement pulp. Doctoral thesis. Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, Finland.
7. Honkasalo, J. (2004): Behaviour of different furnish mixtures in mechanical printing papers. Doctoral thesis. Helsinki University of Technology. Espoo, Finland.
8. Joutsimo, O., Wathén, R., Tamminen, T. (2005): Effect of fiber deformations on pulp sheet properties and fiber strength. Paperi Puu 87(6), 392.
9. Karnis, A. (1994): The mechanism of fibre development in mechanical pulping. J. Pulp Paper Sci. 20(10), J280.
10. Kettunen, H., Yu, Y., Niskanen, K. (2000): Microscopic damage in paper., Part II; Effect of fibre properties. J. Pulp Paper Sci. 26(7), 260.
11. Knuutila, U.M., Barnet, A.J. (1984). New potential from Opeo Pulping Process. XXI EUCEPA International Conference 1984, Torremolinos, Spain, pp.161-170.
12. Kärenlampi, P., Yu, Y. (1997): Fiber properties and paper fracture - fiber length and fiber strength In: C.F.Baker (ed.), The Fundamentals of Papermaking Materials. Transactions of the 11th Fundamental Research Symposium, Cambridge, September 1997, Vol.1, Pira International, Leatherhead, pp.521-546.
13. Lehto, J., Koskenhely, K., Paulapuro, H. (2007): The role of chemical and mechanical pulp fibres in LWC base paper. PTS pulp technology symposium, Dresden, Germany, 27-28 Nov. 2007, PTS, Munich, Germany, Paper 9, 17pp.
14. Lehto, J. (2003): Mechanical fibers as reinforcement pulp. Int. Paper Physics Conf., Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, September 7-11, 2003, PAPTAC, Montreal, Canada, pp.323- 331.
15. Lehtonen, L.K., Rudie, A.W., Coffin, D.W., Page, D.H. (2004): The operating regime in mechanical pulps - the significance of fiber failure, The 2004 Progress in Paper Physics Seminar, Trondheim, Norway, June 21-24, 2004, NTNU and PFI, Trondheim, Norway, pp.38-40.
16. McDonough, TJ., Aziz, S., Rankin, K.L. (1988): The strength of mechanical pulp fibres, 74th Annual Meeting, Montreal, Canada, January 26-27, 1988, CPPA. Montreal, Canada, pp.A245-A251.
17. Niskanen, K., Sirviö, J., Wathén, R., (2005): Tensile strength of paper revisited. In: l'Anson, S.J., (ed.), Advances in paper science and technology. Transactions of the 13th Fundamental Research Symposium, Cambridge, September, Vol.1, PPFRS, Frecheville Court, pp.563-589.
18. Page, D.H. (1969): A theory for the tensile strength of paper. Tappi 52(4), 67.
19. Page, D.H. (1994): A note on the mechanism of tearing strength. Tappi J. 77(3), 201.
20. th fundamental research symposium, Oxford, September 1985, Vol. 1, Mechanical Engineering Publications Ltd, London, pp.77-91.
21. Retulainen, E., Nieminen, K., Nurminen, I. (1993): Enhancing strength properties of kraft and CTMP fibre networks. Appita 46(1), 33.
22. Seth, R.S., Page, D.H. (1975): Fracture resistance: a failure criterion for paper. Tappi 58(9), 112.
23. Seth, R.S. (2001): Zero-span tensile strength of papermaking fibres. Paperi Puu 83(8), 597.
24. Sharman, P.M., Williams, S.G. (1984): Mechanical pulps, where they are and where they're going, 1984 Pulping Conference, San Francisco, CA, USA, November 12-14, 1984, TAPPI, Atlanta, pp. 151-158.
25. Shaw, A.C. (1983): The Opeo process applied to TMP screen rejects. Pulp Paper Can. 84(5), 32.
26. Somboon, P., Paulapuro, H. (2009) Determination of wet fibre strength. Tappi J. 8(5), 4.
27. Vainio, A. (2007): Interfibre bonding and fibre segment activation in paper - observations on the phenomena and their influence on paper strength, Doctoral Thesis, Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, Finland.
28. Wathén, R. (2006): Studies on fibre strength and its effect on paper properties, Dissertation, Helsinki University of Technology, Series A29, Espoo, Finland.
29. Vehniäinen, A. (2008): Single fiber properties - a key to the characteristic defibration patterns from wood to paper fibers, Dissertation, Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, Finland.