Warlpiri Wh-Scope Marking

Syntax

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 97-121

  Legate, Julie Anne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955721257     PISSN: 13680005     EISSN: 14679612     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9612.2011.00151.x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Beck, S. 1996. Quantified structures as barriers for LF-movement. Natural Language Semantics 4:1-56.
2. Beck, S. & S. Berman 2000. Wh-scope marking: Direct vs. indirect dependency. In Wh-scope marking, ed. U. Lutz, G. Müller & A. von Stechow, 17-44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
3. Bresnan, J. 2000. Lexical-functional syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.
4. Bruening, B. 2004. Two types of wh-scope marking in Passamaquoddy. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 22:229-305.
5. Chomsky, N. 1986. Knowledge of language. New York: Praeger.
6. Dayal, V. S. 1994. Scope marking as indirect wh-dependency. Natural Language Semantics 2:137-170.
7. Dayal, V. S. 2000. Scope marking: Cross-linguistic variation in indirect dependency. In Wh-scope marking, ed. U. Lutz, G. Müller & A. von Stechow, 157-193. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
8. Everett, D. 2005. Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Pirahã: Another look at the design features of human language. Current Anthropology 46:621-646.
9. Granites, R. J., K. L. Hale & D. Odling-Smee 1976. Survey of Warlpiri grammar. Ms., MIT, Cambridge, MA.
10. Hale, K. L. 1976. The adjoined relative clause in Australia. In Grammatical categories in Australian languages, ed. R. M. W. Dixon, 78-105. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
11. Hale, K. L. 1982. Some essential features of Warlpiri verbal clauses. In Papers in Warlpiri grammar: In memory of Lothar Jagst, ed. S. Swartz, 217-315. Berrimah, Australia: Summer Institute of Linguistics, Australian Aborigines Branch.
12. Hale, K. L. 1994. Core structures and adjunctions in Warlpiri syntax. In Studies on scrambling: Movement and non-movement approaches to free word-order phenomena, ed. N. Corver & H. van Riemsdijk, 185-219. Hawthorne, NY: Walter de Gruyer.
13. Hale, K. L., M. Laughren & J. Simpson 1995. Warlpiri. In Syntax: An international handbook of contemporary research, ed. J. Jacobs, A. von Stechow, W. Sternfeld & T. Vennemann, 1430-1451. New York: Walter de Gruyter.
14. Herburger, E. 1994. A semantic difference between full and partial wh-movement in German. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Boston, MA (January).
15. Horvath, J. 1997. The status of ''wh-expletives'' and the partial wh-movement construction of Hungarian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 15:509-572.
16. Lahiri, U. 2002. On the proper treatment of ''expletive wh'' in Hindi. Lingua 112:501-540.
17. Laughren, M. 1989. The configurationality parameter and Warlpiri. In Configurationality: The typology of asymmetries, ed. L. K. Maracz & P. Muysken, 319-353. Dordrecht: Foris.
18. Laughren, M. 2002. Syntactic constraints in a ''free word order'' language. In Language universals and variation, ed. M. Amberber & P. Collins, 83-130. Westport, CT: Praeger.
19. Legate, J. A. 1999. Discontinuous noun phrases and the Warlpiri scope-marking construction. Ms., MIT, Cambridge, MA.
20. Legate, J. A. 2002a. Warlpiri: Theoretical implications. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
21. Legate, J. A. 2002b. The hows of wh-scope marking in Warlpiri. Paper presented at NELS 33, MIT, Boston, MA (November).
22. Legate, J. A. 2003. The configurational structure of a nonconfigurational language. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 1:61-104.
23. Legate, J. A. 2010. On how how is used instead of that. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 28:121-134.
24. Lutz, U., G. Müller & A. von Stechow 2000. Wh-scope marking. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
25. Mahajan, A. 1990. The A/A-bar distinction and movement theory. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
26. Mahajan, A. 2000. Towards a unified treatment of wh-expletives in Hindi and German. In Wh-scope marking, ed. U. Lutz, G. Müller & A. von Stechow, pp. 317-332. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
27. McDaniel, D. 1989. Partial and multiple wh-movement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 7:565-604.
28. McDaniel, D., B. Chiu & T. Maxfield 1995. Parameters for wh-movement types. Evidence from child English. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 13:709-753.
29. McGinnis, M. 2004. Lethal ambiguity. Linguistic Inquiry 35:47-95.
30. Nash, D. 1982. Warlpiri preverbs and verb roots. In Papers in Warlpiri grammar: In memory of Lothar Jagst, ed. S. Swartz, 165-216. Berrimah, Australia: Summer Institute of Linguistics, Australian Aborigines Branch.
31. Nevins, A., D. Pesetsky & C. Rodrigues 2009. Pirahã exceptionality: A reassessment. Language 85:355-404.
32. van Riemsdijk, H. 1989. Movement and regeneration. In Dialect variation and the theory of grammar: Proceedings of the GLOW Workshop in Venice, ed. P Benincà, 105-136. Dordrecht: Foris.
33. Stowell, T. 1981. Origins of phrase structure. Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
34. Warlpiri Dictionary Project. 1993. Warlpiri dictionary. Ongoing work with numerous contributors. Machine-readable data files, deposited at the Aboriginal Studies Electronic Data Archive, Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies.
35. Webelhuth, G. 1989. Syntactic saturation phenomena and the modern Germanic languages. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.