A multiple-template approach to protein threading

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 79, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1930-1939

  Peng, Jian ^a   Xu, Jinbo ^a  

^a TOYOTA TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTE AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Multiple sequence template alignment; Multiple template threading; Probabilistic alignment matrix; Probabilistic consistency algorithm; Protein modeling

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN PROCESSING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEIN THREADING;

ALGORITHMS; DATABASES, PROTEIN; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

EID: 79955715769     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.23016     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Zhou H, Zhou Y. SPARKS 2 and SP3 servers in CASP6. Proteins 2005; 61 Suppl 7: 152-156.
2. Wu S, Zhang Y. MUSTER: improving protein sequence profile-profile alignments by using multiple sources of structure information. Proteins 2008; 72: 547-556.
3. Peng J, Xu J. Boosting protein threading accuracy. Lect Notes Comput Sci 2009; 5541: 31.
4. Shi J, Blundell TL, Mizuguchi K. FUGUE: sequence-structure homology recognition using environment-specific substitution tables and structure-dependent gap penalties. J Mol Biol 2001; 310: 243-257.
5. Xu J, Li M. Assessment of RAPTOR's linear programming approach in CAFASP3. Proteins 2003; 53 Suppl 6: 579-584.
6. Xu J, Li M, Kim D, Xu Y. RAPTOR: optimal protein threading by linear programming. J Bioinform Comput Biol 2003; 1: 95-117.
7. Larsson P, Wallner B, Lindahl E, Elofsson A. Using multiple templates to improve quality of homology models in automated homology modeling. Protein Sci 2008; 17: 990-1002.
8. Cheng JL. A multi-template combination algorithm for protein comparative modeling. BMC Struct Biol 2008; 8: 18.
9. Fernandez-Fuentes N, Madrid-Aliste CJ, Rai BK, Fajardo JE, Fiser A. M4T: a comparative protein structure modeling server. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35: W363-W368.
10. Rykunov D, Steinberger E, Madrid-Aliste CJ, Fiser A. Improved scoring function for comparative modeling using the M4T method. J Struct Funct Genomics 2009; 10: 95-99.
11. Joo K, Lee J, Lee S, Seo JH, Lee SJ, Lee J. High accuracy template based modeling by global optimization. Proteins 2007; 69: 83-89.
12. Peng J, Xu J. Low-homology protein threading. Bioinformatics 2010; 26: i294-i300.
13. Do CB, Mahabhashyam MS, Brudno M, Batzoglou S. ProbCons: probabilistic consistency-based multiple sequence alignment. Genome Res 2005; 15: 330-340.
14. Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res 2002; 30: 3059-3066.
15. Notredame C, Higgins DG, Heringa J. T-Coffee: a novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment. J Mol Biol 2000; 302: 205-217.
16. Notredame C. Computing multiple sequence/structure alignments with the T-coffee package. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics 2010;Chapter 3:Unit 3.8: 1-25.
17. Wallace IM, O'Sullivan O, Higgins DG, Notredame C. M-Coffee: combining multiple sequence alignment methods with T-Coffee. Nucleic Acids Res 2006; 34: 1692-1699.
18. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32: 1792-1797.
19. Pei JM, Kim BH, Grishin NV. PROMALS3D: a tool for multiple protein sequence and structure alignments. Nucleic Acids Res 2008; 36: 2295-2300.
20. Sali A. Comparative protein modeling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. Mol Med Today 1995; 1: 270-277.
21. Zhang Y, Skolnick J. Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality. Proteins 2004; 57: 702-710.
22. Gusfield D. Efficient methods for multiple sequence alignment with guaranteed error bounds. Bull Math Biol 1993; 55: 141-154.
23. Zhang Y, Skolnick J. TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score. Nucleic Acids Res 2005; 33: 2302-2309.
24. Menke M, Berger B, Cowen L. Matt: local flexibility aids protein multiple structure alignment. PLoS Comput Biol 2008; 4: e10.
25. Zhang Y. I-TASSER: fully automated protein structure prediction in CASP8. Proteins 2009; 77: 100-113.
26. Zhang Y. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics 2008; 9: 40.
27. Hildebrand A, Remmert M, Biegert A, Soding J. Fast and accurate automatic structure prediction with HHpred. Proteins 2009; 77: 128-132.
28. Kelley LA, Sternberg MJE. Protein structure prediction on the Web: a case study using the Phyre server. Nat Protoc 2009; 4: 363-371.
29. Das R, Baker D. Macromolecular modeling with rosetta. Annu Rev Biochem 2008; 77: 363-382.
30. Raman S, Vernon R, Thompson J, Tyka M, Sadreyev R, Pei J, Kim D, Kellogg E, DiMaio F, Lange O, Kinch L, Sheffler W, Kim BH, Das R, Grishin NV, Baker D. Structure prediction for CASP8 with all-atom refinement using Rosetta. Proteins 2009; 77 Suppl 9: 89-99.
31. Zhou H, Skolnick J. Protein structure prediction by pro-Sp3-TASSER. Biophys J 2009; 96: 2119-2127.
32. Soding J. Protein homology detection by HMM-HMM comparison. Bioinformatics 2005; 21: 951-960.
33. Muckstein U, Hofacker IL, Stadler PF. Stochastic pairwise alignments. Bioinformatics 2002; 18 Suppl 2: S153-S160.
34. Feng DF, Doolittle RF. Progressive sequence alignment as a prerequisite to correct phylogenetic trees. J Mol Evol 1987; 25: 351-360.
35. Gotoh O. Significant improvement in accuracy of multiple protein sequence alignments by iterative refinement as assessed by reference to structural alignments. J Mol Biol 1996; 264: 823-838.