Revocation Trends: A Threat to the Legitimacy of Community-Based Corrections

The Prison Journal

Volumn 91, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 207-226

  Wodahl, Eric J ^a   Ogle, Robbin ^a   Heck, Cary ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING   (United States)

Author keywords

community corrections; organizational legitimacy; revocations

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955709698     PISSN: 00328855     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0032885511404356     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Austin, J. (2002). Maine county jail population study. Washington, DC: The Institute on Crime Justice and Corrections. Retrieved from http://nicic.org/Library/019385
2. Bonczar, T.P. (1997). Characteristics of adults on probation, 1995. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
3. Brinkerhoff, D.W. (2005). Organisational legitimacy, capacity, and capacity development. Retrieved from http://spiderman.ecdpm.org/Web_Capacity/Web/UK_Content/Download.nsf/0/1327C8BA41AE417DC1256FF100309F42/$FILE/Brinkerhoff_legitimacy%20paper_DP58A_2005.pdf
4. Buckler, K.G., & Travis, L.F. (2003). Reanalyzing the prevalence and social context of collateral consequence statutes. Journal of Criminal Justice, 31, 435-453.
5. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1990). National corrections reporting program, 1985. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
6. Burke, P.B. (1997). Policy-driven responses to probation and parole violations. Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections.
7. Burke, P. (2001). Probation and parole violators: An overview of critical issues. In M. Carter (ed.), Responding to probation and parole violators: A handbook to guide local policy development (pp. 5-12). U.S. Department of Justice: National Institute of Corrections.
8. Burke, P. (2004). Parole violations revisited: A handbook on strengthening parole practices for public safety and successful transition to the community (NIC Publication No. 019833). Retrieved from www.nicic.org
9. Clear, T.P., Harris, P.M., & Baird, S.C. (1992). Probationer violations and officer response. Journal of Criminal Justice, 20, 1-12.
10. Cox, S.M., & Bantley, K. (2005). Evaluation of the court support services division's probation transition program and technical violation unit. Retrieved from http://www.jud.ct.gov/external/news/ProbPilot.pdf
11. Crabbe, N. (2005, November 17). Why is the jail so crowded? The Gainesville Sun. Retrieved September 7, 2006, from http://www.gainesville.com
12. Criminal Justice Policy Council. (2002). Trends, profile and policy issues related to felony probation revocations in Texas. Retrieved from http://www.nicic.org/Library/017748
13. Dressler, D. (1969). Practice and theory of probation and parole. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
14. Eisenstein, J., & Jacob, H. (1977). Felony justice: An organizational analysis of criminal courts. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
15. Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.
16. Glaze, L.E., Bonzcar, T.P. (2006). Probation and parole in the United States, 2005. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
17. Glaze, L.E., Bonzcar, T.P. (2007). Probation and parole in the United States, 2006. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
18. Glaze, L.E., & Bonczar, T.P. (2008). Probation and parole in the United States, 2007, Statistical Tables. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
19. Glaze, L.E., & Bonczar, T.P. (2009). Probation and parole in the United States, 2008, Statistical Tables. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
20. Gonska, J.A. (1994). A sanction program for noncompliant offenders in the district of Nevada. Federal Probation, 58 (4), 11-15.
21. Gray, M.K., Fields, M., & Maxwell, S.R. (2001). Examining probation violations: Who, what, and when. Crime & Delinquency, 47, 537-557.
22. Hudson, B.A. (1996). Understanding justice: An introduction to ideas, perspectives and controversies in modern penal theory. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
23. Hughes, T., Wilson, D.J., & Beck, A.J. (2001). Trends in state parole, 1990-2000. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
24. Keegan, S., & Solomon, A.L. (2004). Prisoner reentry in Virginia. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute. Retrieved September 7, 2006, from http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/411174_Prisoner_Reentry_VA.pdf
25. Kleiman, M.A., Tran, T.H., Fishbein, P., Magula, M., Allen, W., & Lacy, G. (2003). Opportunities and barriers in probation reform: A case study of drug testing and sanctions. Berkeley: California Policy Research Center. Retrieved September 16, 2006, from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/0238v37t
26. Little Hoover Commission. (2003). Back to the community: Safe and sound parole policies. Sacramento, CA: Author.
27. Maxwell, S.R., Gray, M.K., & Bynum, T. (1999). Probationer recidivism in Michigan: A collaborative study between the School of Criminal Justice and the Michigan Department of Corrections. Retrieved from http://www.ippsr.msu.edu/AppliedResearch/SMaxwellBynum.htm
28. Michigan Task Force on Jail and Prison Overcrowding. (2005). Michigan task force on jail and prison overcrowding: Final report. Retrieved from http://www.michigan.gov/documents/report_119595_7.pdf
29. Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R., & Wood, D.J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy Management Review, 22, 853-886.
30. Morris, N., & Tonry, M. (1990). Between prison and probation: Intermediate punishments in a rational sentencing system. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
31. National Association of Drug Court Professionals. (1997). Defining drug courts: The key components. Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Dept. of Justice.
32. Ogle, R.S. (1998). Theoretical perspectives on correctional structure, evaluation, and change. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 9, 43-71.
33. Ogle, R.S. (1999). Prison privatization: An environmental catch-22. Justice Quarterly, 16, 579-600.
34. O’Leary, V., & Clear, T.R. (1997). Community corrections approaching the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections. Retrieved from www.nicic.org
35. Parent, D., Wentworth, D., Burke, P., & Ney, B. (1994). Responding to probation and parole violations. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
36. Petersilia, J. (1998). A decade of experimenting with intermediate sanctions: What have we learned? Federal Probation, 62 (2), 3-10.
37. Petersilia, J., Turner, S., Kahan, J., & Peterson, J. (1985). Granting felons probation: Public risks and alternatives. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
38. Reinventing Probation Council. (2000). Transforming probation through leadership: The “broken windows” model. New York, NY: Manhattan Institute for Policy Research. Retrieved from http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/broken_windows.htm
39. Rhine, E.E. (1998). Probation and parole supervision: Time for a new narrative. Perspectives, 22 (1), 26-28.
40. Rothman, D.J. (1980). Conscience and convenience: The asylum and its alternatives in progressive America. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
41. Sable, W.J., & Couture, H. (2008). Prison inmates at midyear 2007. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
42. Schiflett, K.L., & Zey, M. (1990). Comparison of characteristics of private product producing organizations and public service organizations. Sociological Quarterly, 31, 569-583.
43. Scott, W.R. (1981). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
44. Seiter, R.P. (2005). Corrections: An introduction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
45. Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in Administration. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
46. Simon, J. (1996). Poor discipline: Parole and the social control of the underclass, 1980-1990. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
47. Steinhauer, J. (2008, November 17). Facing deficits, states get out sharper knives. The New York Times. Retrieved February 23, 2009, from http://www.nytimes.com
48. Suchman, M.C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571-610.
49. Taxman, F.S. (1995). Intermediate sanctions: Dealing with technical violators. Corrections Today, 57, 46-57.
50. Taxman, F.S., Soule, D., & Gelb, A. (1999). Graduated sanctions: Stepping into accountable systems and offenders. The Prison Journal, 79, 182-204.
51. Travis, J., & Lawrence, S. (2002). Beyond the prison gates: The state of parole in America. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
52. Wodahl, E.J., & Garland, B. (2009). The evolution of community corrections: The enduring influence of the prison, The Prison Journal, 89, 81S-104S