Policy, personal dispositions and the evaluation of aircraft noise

Journal of Environmental Psychology

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 147-157

  Kroesen, Maarten ^a   Molin, Eric J E ^a   van Wee, Bert ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Aircraft noise; Discourse resonance theory; Latent class analysis; Noise annoyance

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955705157     PISSN: 02724944     EISSN: 15229610     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.09.004     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Alexandre A. Assessment of certain causal models used in surveys on aircraft noise annoyance. Journal of Sound and Vibration 1976, 44:119-125.
2. Anderson N.H. A functional theory of cognition 1996, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
3. Bartlett F.C. Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology 1932, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
4. Belojevic G., Jakovljevic B., Aleksic O. Subjective reactions to traffic noise with regard to some personality traits. Environment International 1997, 23:221-226.
5. Benford R.D., Snow D.A. Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology 2000, 26:611-639.
6. Bijstervelt K. Mechanical sound: Technology, culture, and public problems of noise in the twentieth century 2008, MIT Press, Cambridge.
7. Brehm J.W., Cohen A.R. Explorations in cognitive dissonance 1962, Wiley, New York.
8. Bröer C. Beleid vormt overlast, hoe beleidsdiscoursen de beleving van geluid bepalen (policy annoyance, how policy discourses shape the experience of aircraft sound) 2006, Aksant, Amsterdam.
9. Bröer C. Aircraft noise and risk politics. Health Risk & Society 2007, 9:37-52.
10. Bröer C. Private Trouble, policy issue people's noise annoyance and policy discourse. Critical Policy Studies 2008, 2:93-117.
11. Bröer C., Duyvendak J.W. Discursive opportunities, feeling rules, and the rise of protests against aircraft noise. Mobilization 2009, 14:337-356.
12. Brown S.R. Political subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science 1980, Yale University Press, New Haven.
13. Entman R.M. Framing - toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication 1993, 43:51-58.
14. Festinger L. A theory of cognitive dissonance 1957, Row, Peterson, Evanston.
15. Fidell S. The Schultz curve 25 years later: A research perspective. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2003, 114:3007-3015.
16. Fidell S., Barber D.S., Schultz T.J. Updating a dosage-effect relationship for the prevalence of annoyance due to general transportation noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1991, 89:221-233.
17. Fields J.M., De Jong R.G., Gjestland T., Flindell I.H., Job R.F.S., Kurra S., et al. Standardized general-purpose noise reaction questions for community noise surveys: Research and a recommendation. Journal of Sound and Vibration 2001, 242:641-679.
18. Frewer L.J., Miles S., Marsh R. The media and genetically modified foods: Evidence in support of social amplification of risk. Risk Analysis 2002, 22:701-711.
19. Glaser B.G., Strauss A.L. The discovery of grounded theory; strategies for qualitative research 1967, Aldine (Pub. Co), Chicago.
20. Glass D.C., Singer J.E. Urban stress: Experiments on noise and social stressors 1972, Academic Press, New York.
21. Goffman E. Frame analysis 1974, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
22. Guski R. Personal and social variables as co-determinants of noise-annoyance. Noise and Health 1999, 3:45-56.
23. Hagenaars J.A., McCutcheon A.L. Applied latent class analysis 2002, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
24. Hajer M. The politics of environmental discourse, ecological modernization and the policy process 1995, Claredon Press, Oxford.
25. Heider F. Attitudes and cognitive organization. Journal of Psychology 1946, 21:107-112.
26. Heinonen-Guzejev M., Vuorinen H.S., Mussalo-Rauhamaa H., Heikkilä K., Koskenvuo M., Kaprio J. Genetic component of noise sensitivity. Twin Research and Human Genetics 2005, 8:245-249.
27. Hochschild A.R. Emotion work, feeling rules and social structure. American Journal of Sociology 1979, 85:551-575.
28. Job R.F.S. Community response to noise: A review of factors influencing the relationship between noise exposure and reaction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1988, 83:991-1001.
29. Jonsson E., Sörensen S. On the influence of attitudes to the source on annoyance reactions to noise. An experimental study. Nordisk hygienisk tidskrift 1967, 48:35-45.
30. Jonsson E., Sörensen S. Relation between annoyance reactions and attitude to source of annoyance. Public Health Reports 1970, 85:1070-1074.
31. Jue G.M., Shumaker S.A., Evans G.W. Community opinion concerning airport noise-abatement alternatives. Journal of Environmental Psychology 1984, 4:337-345.
32. Kasperson R.E., Kasperson J.X. The social amplification and attenuation of risk. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 1996, 545:95-105.
33. Kasperson R.E., Renn O., Slovic P., Brown H.S., Emel J., Goble R., et al. The social amplification of risk - a conceptual-framework. Risk Analysis 1988, 8:177-187.
34. Kingdon J.W. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies 1984, Harper Collins, Glasgow.
35. Koopmans R., Olzak S. Discursive opportunities and the evolution of right-wing violence in Germany. American Journal of Sociology 2004, 110:198-230.
36. Kroesen M., Bröer C. Policy discourse, people's internal frames, and declared aircraft noise annoyance: An application of Q-methodology. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2009, 126:195-207.
37. Kroesen M., Molin E.J.E., Van Wee B. Testing a theory of aircraft noise annoyance: A structural equation analysis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2008, 123:4250-4260.
38. Langeheine R., Pannekoek J., Van de Pol F. Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measures in categorical data analysis. Sociological Methods & Research 1996, 24:492-516.
39. Magidson J., Vermunt J.K. Latent class models. The Sage Handbook of Quantitative Methodology for the Social Sciences 2004, 175-198.
40. McCutcheon A.L. Latent class analysis 1987, Sage Publications, Inc, Beverly Hills.
41. Miedema H.M.E., Oudshoorn C.G.M. Annoyance from transportation noise: Relationships with exposure metrics DNL and DENL and their confidence intervals. Environmental Health Perspectives 2001, 109:409-416.
42. Miedema H.M.E., Vos H. Noise sensitivity and reactions to noise and other environmental conditions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2003, 113:1492-1504.
43. Nylund K.L., Asparoutiov T., Muthen B.O. Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling-a Multidisciplinary Journal 2007, 14:535-569.
44. Quehl J., Basner M. Annoyance from nocturnal aircraft noise exposure: Laboratory and field-specific dose-response curves. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2006, 26:127-140.
45. Schön D., Rein M. Frame reflection: Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies 1994, Basic Books, New York.
46. Schultz T.J. Synthesis on social surveys on noise annoyance. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1978, 64:377-405.
47. Sclove S.L. Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis. Psychometrika 1987, 52:333-343.
48. Simon D., Snow C.J., Read S.J. The redux of cognitive consistency theories: Evidence judgments by constraint satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2004, 86:814-837.
49. Smit P., Van Gunsteren H. Cultuur en contitutievorming rond Schiphol (Culture and the creation of a constitution at Schiphol). Beleid en Maatschappij 1997, 2:62-73.
50. Snow D.A., Worden S.K., Rochford E.B., Benford R.D. Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review 1986, 51:464-481.
51. Sörensen S. On the possibilities of changing the annoyance reaction to noise by changing the attitudes to the source of annoyance. Nordisk Hygienisk Tidskrift 1970, (Suppl. 1):5-76.
52. Stallen P.J., De Boer E., Kamphuis J., Van der Kluit S., Smit P., Wolleswinkel H. Fundering in de Regio, bijdrage aan het geluidsbeleid schiphol 2004, Available at, Universiteit van Leiden, Leiden, accessed March 2010. http://www2.vlieghinder.nl/knipsels_pmach/pdfs/0409xx_stallen_fundering_in_de_regios.pdf(accessed.
53. Stallen P.J., Van Gunsteren H. Schiphol and the illusion of a no-annoyance society 2002, Available at, Ministry of Transport, The Hague, accessed March 2010. http://www.verkeerenwaterstaat.nl/kennisplein/uploaded/MIN/2005-05/187563/Essays.eng.versie.pdf(accessed.
54. Stansfeld S.A. Noise, noise sensitivity and psychiatric disorder: Epidemiological and psychophysiological studies. Psychological Medicine 1992, 22:1-44.
55. Staples S.L., Cornelius R.R., Gibbs M.S. Noise disturbance from a developing airport perceived risk or general annoyance?. Environment and Behavior 1999, 31:692-710.
56. Svenson O. Differentiation and consolidation theory of human decision making: A frame of reference for the study of pre- and post-decision processes. Acta Psychologica 1992, 80:143-168.
57. TNO, RIVM Hinder, Slaapverstoring, Gezondheids en Belevingsaspecten in de Regio Schiphol, Resultaten Van Een Vragenlijstonderzoek. (Report 98.039) 1998, Leiden, The Netherlands. Available at:. http://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/rapporten/441520010.pdf.
58. Van Kamp I., Job R.F.S., Hatfield J., Haines M., Stellato R.K., Stansfeld S.A. The role of noise sensitivity in the noise-response relation: A comparison of three international airport studies. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2004, 116:3471-3479.
59. Vermunt J.K., Magidson J. Technical guide for Latent GOLD 4.0: basic and advanced 2005, Statistical Innovations Inc, Belmont Massachusetts.
60. Weinstein N.D. Individual differences in reactions to noise: A longitudinal study in a college dormitory. Journal of Applied Psychology 1978, 63:458-566.
61. Zimmer K., Ellermeier W. Psychometric properties of four measures of noise sensitivity: A comparison. Journal of Environmental Psychology 1999, 19:295-302.