Continuing challenges in defining image quality

Pediatric Radiology

Volumn 41, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 582-587

  Shet, Narendra ^a   Chen, Joseph ^a   Siegel, Eliot L ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b University Maryland Medical Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Auality; Dose reduction; Quality; RadLex

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION EXPOSURE; THERAPY EFFECT;

HUMANS; PEDIATRICS; QUALITY CONTROL; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT;

EID: 79955700122     PISSN: 03010449     EISSN: 14321998     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00247-011-2028-0     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Wikipedia (2010) Image quality. Available via http://en.wikipedia. org/wiki/Image-quality. Accessed 20 Oct 2010
2. Council of European Communities (1996) European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images, Rep EUR 16260 EN. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
3. Krupinski EA, Johnson J, Roehrig H et al (2003) Using a human visual system model to optimize soft-copy mammography display: influence of MTF compensation. Acad Radiol 10:1030-1035 (Pubitemid 37071386)
4. Johnson JP, Lubin J, Nafziger JS et al (2005) Channelized model observer using a visual discrimination model. Proc SPIE 5749:199
5. Barrett HH (1990) Objective assessment of image quality: effects of quantum noise and object variability. J Opt Soc Am 7:1266-1278
6. Barrett HH, Yao J, Rolland JP et al (1993) Model observers for assessment of image quality. Proc Nat Acad of Sci USA 90:9758-9765 (Pubitemid 23328191)
7. Aanestad M, Edwin B, Mårvik R (2003) Medical image quality as a socio-technical phenomenon. Methods Inf Med 42:302-306 (Pubitemid 37288174)
8. Cosman PC, Gray RM, Olshen RA (1994) Evaluating quality of compressed medical images: SNR, subjective rating, and diagnostic accuracy. Proc IEEE 82:919-932
9. Siegel EL, Khorasani R (2007) To compress or not to compress: a compressed debate. J Am Coll Radiol 1:981-983 (Pubitemid 40363738)
10. Peli E (1995) Vision models for target detection and recognition, vol 2. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore
11. Stedman's Electronic Medical Dictionary 7.0 (2006) Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, USA
12. Radiological Society of North America (2010) RadLex: a lexicon for uniform indexing and retrieval of radiology information resources. Available via http://www.rsna.org/radlex/. Accessed 22 Oct 2010
13. International Labour Office (ILO) (2002) Guidelines for the Use of the ILO International Classification of Radiographs of Pneumoconioses, Revised Edition 2000 (Occupational Safety and Health Series, No. 22). International Labour Office, Geneva
14. Reiner BI (2009) Automating quality assurance for digital radiography. J Am Coll Radiol 6:486-490
15. Reiner BI, Siegel E, Foos D et al (2007) Quantitative analysis of digital radiography QA deficiencies. In: Abstracts of the Annual Meeting of the Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine, Providence, RI, USA
16. Chen JJ, Reiner B, Siegel E et al (2008) Beauty in the eyes of the beholder: image quality perceptions for digital radiography. In: Abstracts of the Annual Meeting of the Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
17. Nguyen K, Reiner B, Sehnert J et al (2007) Multi-institutional analysis of retake rates for digital chest radiography: comparison of portable vs. erect chest radiographs. In: Abstracts of the Radiological Society of North America Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, USA