The cost of energy analysis and energy planning for emerging, fossil fuel power plants based on the climate change scenarios

Energy

Volumn 36, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 3606-3612

  Park, Kyungtae ^a   Shin, Dongil ^b   Yoon, En Sup ^a,c  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^b Myong Ji University   (South Korea)

^c Department of Aerospace Engineering   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Climate change scenario; CO2 emission; Cost of Energy; Energy planning; Fossil power plant

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; COAL GASIFICATION PLANTS; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COSTS; ENERGY MANAGEMENT; FOSSIL FUEL POWER PLANTS; FOSSIL FUELS; GAS PLANTS; PULVERIZED FUEL;

CALCULATION METHODS; CLIMATE CHANGE SCENARIOS; CO2 EMISSION; ECONOMIC COMPARISONS; ENERGY ANALYSIS; ENERGY PLANNING; FOSSIL POWER PLANTS; FUEL PRICES; INTEGRATED GASIFICATION COMBINED CYCLE POWER PLANTS; INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY; NATURAL GAS COMBINED CYCLES; PULVERIZED COALS;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; CLIMATE CHANGE; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ENERGY PLANNING; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; FOSSIL FUEL; NATURAL GAS; POWER PLANT; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 79955690495     PISSN: 03605442     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2011.03.080     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. DOE/NETL Cost and performance baseline for fossil energy plants 2007, vol. 1.
2. James Rhodes S., Keith David W. Engineering economic analysis of biomass IGCC with carbon capture and storage. Biomass and Bioenergy 2005, 29:440-450.
3. Garcia Guillermo O., Douglas Peter, Croiset Eric, Zheng Ligang Technoeconomic evaluation of IGCC power plants for CO2 avoidance. Energy Conversion and Management 2006, 47:2250-2259.
4. Chen Chao, Rubin Edward S. CO2 control technology effects on IGCC plant performance and cost. Energy Policy 2009, 37:915-924.
5. Henriette Undrum, Olav Bolland, Eivind Aarebrot. Economical assessment of natural gas fired combined cycle power plant with CO2 capture and sequestration. Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies 2000.
6. Edward S. Rubin, Anand B. Rao and Chao Chen. Comparative assessments of fossil fuel power plants with CO2 capture and storage. Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies 2004.
7. IEA World energy outlook 2008 2008.
8. IEA World energy outlook 2009 2009.
9. Index Mundi, ; 2010 [accessed 27.11.10]. http://www.indexmundi.com/commodities.
10. Zheng Ligang, Furinsky Edward Comparison of Shell, Texaco, BGL and KRW gasifiers as part of IGCC plant computer simulations. Energy Conversion and Management 2005, 46:1767-1779.
11. Kanniche Mohamed, Bouallou Chakib CO2 capture study in advanced integrated gasification combined cycle. Applied Thermal Engineering 2007, 27:2693-2702.
12. Pérez-Fortes M., Bojarski A.D., Velo E., Nougués J.M., Puigjaner L. Conceptual model and evaluation of generated power and emissions in an IGCC plant. Energy 2009, 34:1721-1732.
13. Kunze Christian, Spliethoff Hartmut Modeling of an IGCC plant with carbon capture for 2020. Fuel Processing Technology 2010, 91:934-941.
14. Pamela Spath L., Margaret Mann K. Life cycle assessment of a natural gas combined-cycle power generation system 2000, NREL.
15. Hammond Geoffey P., Serge S., Akwe Ondo Thermodynamic and related analysis of natural gas combined cycle power plants with and without carbon sequestration. International Journal of Energy Research 2000, 31:1180-1201.
16. Bolland Olav, Undrum Henriette A novel methodology for comparing CO2 capture options for natural gas-fired combined cycle plants. Advances in Environmental Research 2003, 7:901-911.
17. Short Walter, Packey Daniel J., Holt Thomas A Manual for the economic evaluation of energy efficiency and renewable energy technologies 1995, NREL.
18. NREL Solar advisor model user guide 2010, NREL.
19. IPCC Carbon dioxide capture and storage 2005, Cambridge University Press.
20. Aspen technology Aspen plus IGCC model 2008, Aspen Technology.
21. NETL/CTC Evaluation of fossil fuel power plants with CO2 recovery 2002, DOE.
22. Cormio C., Dicorato M., Minoia A., Trovato M. A regional energy planning methodology including renewable energy sources and environmental constraints. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2003, 7:99-130.
23. Cai Y.P., Huang G.H., Yang Z.F., Lin Q.G., Tan Q. Community-scale renewable energy systems planning under uncertainty- an interval chance-constrained programming approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2009, 13:721-735.
24. Terrados J., Almonacid G., Pérez-Higueras P. Proposal for a combined methodology for renewable energy planning: application to a Spanish region. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2009, 13:2022-2030.
25. Koo Jamin, Han Kyusang, Yoon En Sup Integration of CCS, emissions trading and volatilities of fuel prices into stainable energy planning, and its robust optimization. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2010, 10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.050.
26. DOE Carbon dioxide emissions from generation of electric power in the United States 2000.
27. Zhu Bing, Zhou Wenji, Hu Shanying, Li Qiang, Griffy-Brown Charla, Jin Yong CO2 emissions and reduction potential in china's chemical industry. Energy 2010, 10.1016/j.energy.2010.09.038.
28. Web data, ; 2010 [accessed 27.11.10]. http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/breaking/2010/0302/breaking27.html.