International survey on attitudes toward ethics in health technology assessment: An exploratory study

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 50-54

  Arellano, Luis E ^a   Willett, Jeffrey M ^a   Borry, Pascal ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Bioethics; Health technology assessment; International survey

Indexed keywords

BIOETHICS; CITIZEN PARTICIPATION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DECISION MAKERS; EXPLORATORY STUDIES; EXTERNAL CONSULTANTS; FINAL DECISION; HEALTH PROFESSIONALS; HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENTS; HEALTH-CARE DECISIONS; INTERNATIONAL JOURNALS; INTERNATIONAL SURVEY; POSITIVE ATTITUDE; RESPONSE RATE; SAMPLE POPULATION; SURVEY INSTRUMENTS; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENTS; VALUE JUDGMENT; WESTERN COUNTRIES;

HEALTH; HEALTH CARE; RATING; SURVEYS;

PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECTS;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOETHICS; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; E-MAIL; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HEALTH ECONOMICS; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIOLOGY; ATTITUDE; ETHICS; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; MIDDLE AGED;

ADULT; ATTITUDE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNATIONALITY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL;

EID: 79955687619     PISSN: 02664623     EISSN: 14716348     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0266462310001182     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Autti-Ramo I, Makela M. Ethical evaluation in health technol¬ogy assessment reports: An eclectic approach. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007;23:1-8. (Pubitemid 46648293)
2. Busse R, Orvain J, Velasco M, et al. Best practice in undertak¬ing and reporting health technology assessments. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2002;18:316-422.
3. Dickenson D, Vineis P. Evidence-based medicine and quality of care. Health Care Anal. 2002;10:243-259. (Pubitemid 36541471)
4. European Network for Health Technology Assessment (EU-netHTA). WP4-HTA core model for medical and surgical in¬terventions. First draft (revised-work in progress): July 2007.
5. Hofmann BM. Why ethics should be part of health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008;24:423-429.
6. Hofmann B. Toward a procedure for integrating moral issues in health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005;21:312-318. (Pubitemid 41099211)
7. International Network of Agencies for Health Technology As¬sessment (INAHTA). Handling ethical issues in INAHTA agen¬cies: INAHTA Newsletter 2003 (Mar);XI(1).
8. INAHTA Ethics Working Group. INAHTA'S working group on handling ethical issues. Final Report: June 2005.
9. Kirsten FL, Karsenberg K, Hummel M, Bueno-de-Mesquita J, van Harten W. Methodology of constructive technology as¬sessment in health care. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007;23:162-168. (Pubitemid 46642723)
10. Lehoux P, Williams-Jones B. Mapping in the integration of social and ethical issues in health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007;23:9-16. (Pubitemid 46648294)
11. van der Wilt J, Reuzel R, Banta D. The ethics of assessing health technologies. Theor Med Bioeth. 2000;21:103-115. (Pubitemid 30449407)
12. Vineis P. Evidence-based medicine and ethics: A practical ap¬proach. J Med Ethics. 2004;30:126-130. (Pubitemid 38559857)