MRI Phenotyping of Genetically Altered Mice

Methods in Molecular Biology

Volumn 711, Issue , 2011, Pages 349-361

  Lerch, Jason P ^a,b   Sled, John G ^a,c   Henkelman, R Mark ^a,b  

^a HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

genetics; Magnetic resonance imaging; mouse models; phenotyping

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIMENTAL MOUSE; GENETIC SIMILARITY; GENOTYPE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; MOUSE; MOUSE MODEL; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHENOTYPE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; TRANSGENIC MOUSE;

MAMMALIA; MUS;

ANIMALS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MICE; MICE, TRANSGENIC; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; PHENOTYPE;

EID: 79955669623     PISSN: 10643745     EISSN: 19406029     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-61737-992-5_17     Document Type: Chapter

References (16)

1. Waterston, R. H., Lindblad-Toh, K., Birney, E. et al. Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature 2002;420:520–562.
2. Henkelman, R., Dazai, J., Lifschitz, N. et al. High throughput microimaging of the mouse brain. Proc Int Soc Magn Reson Med 2006.
3. Nieman, B., Bishop, J., Dazai, J. et al. MR technology for biological studies in mice. NMR Biomed 2007;20:291–303.
4. Bock, N., Nieman, B., Bishop, J., Mark Henkelman, R. In vivo multiple-mouse MRI at 7 tesla. Magn Reson Med 2005;54: 1311–1316.
5. Spring, S., Lerch, J., Henkelman, R. Sexual dimorphism revealed in the structure of the mouse brain using three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage 2007;35:1424–1433.
6. Dazai, J., Bock, N. A., Nieman, B. J., Davidson, L. M., Henkelman, R. M., Chen, X. J. Multiple mouse biological loading and monitoring system for MRI. Magn Reson Med 2004;52:709–715.
7. Collins, D. L., Neelin, P., Peters, T. M., Evans, A. C. Automatic 3d intersubject registration of MR volumetric data in standardized talairach space. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1994;18:192–205.
8. Collins, D., Holmes, C., Peters, T. M., Evans, A. Automatic 3-D model-based neuroanatomical segmentation. Hum Brain Mapp 1995;3:190–208.
9. Kale, S. C., Lerch, J., Henkelman, R. M., Chen, X. J. Optimization of the SNR-resolution tradeoff for registration of magnetic resonance images. Hum Brain Mapp 2008;29:1147–1158.
10. Sled, J. G., Zijdenbos, A. P., Evans, A. C. A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1998;17:87–97.
11. Chung, M. K., Worsley, K. J., Paus, T. et al. A unified statistical approach to deformation-based morphometry. Neuroimage 2001;14:595–606.
12. Dorr, A., Lerch, J., Spring, S., Kabani, N., Henkelman, R. High resolution three-dimensional brain atlas using an average magnetic resonance image of 40 adult C57Bl/6j mice. Neuroimage 2008;42:60–69.
13. Genovese, C. R., Lazar, N. A., Nichols, T. Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate. Neuroimage 2002;15:870–878.
14. Nichols, T., Hayasaka, S. Controlling the familywise error rate in functional neuroimaging: A comparative review. Stat Methods Med Res 2003;12:419–446.
15. Nichols, T. E., Holmes, A. P. Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples. Hum Brain Mapp 2002;15:1–25.
16. Worsley, K. J., Taylor, J. E., Tomaiuolo, F., Lerch, J. Unified univariate and multivariate random field theory. Neuroimage 2004;23(Suppl 1):S189–S195.