Determining the sidewalk pavement width by using pedestrian discomfort levels and movement characteristics

KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 883-889

  Kim, Sangyoup ^a   Choi, Jaisung ^a   Kim, Yongseok ^b  

^a University of Seoul   (South Korea)

^b Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology   (South Korea)

Author keywords

foot path trajectory; pedestrian level of service; sidewalk pavement width; state preference; urban street cross section

Indexed keywords

FOOT PATH TRAJECTORY; PEDESTRIAN LEVEL OF SERVICE; SIDEWALK PAVEMENT WIDTH; STATE PREFERENCE; URBAN STREETS;

DESIGN; RETROFITTING; TRAJECTORIES; URBAN PLANNING;

PAVEMENTS;

EID: 79955664124     PISSN: 12267988     EISSN: 19763808     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12205-011-1173-1     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Akasakal, Y. and Onisawa, T. (2008). "Personalized pedestrian navigation system with subjective preference based route selection." Studies in Computational Intelligence, Vol. 117, Berlin, pp. 73-91.
2. Americans with Disability Act (ADA) (1992). Accessibility guidelines for: Buildings and facilities, transportation facilities, and transportation vehicles, US Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board, Washington, D. C.
3. City of New York (2006). New York City pedestrian level of service study (Phase I).
4. Dixon, L. B. (1996). "Bicycle and pedestrian level of service performance measures and standards for congestion management systems." Transportation Research Record, Issue 1538, pp. 1-9.
5. Epperson, B. (1994). "Evaluating the suitability of roadways for bicycle use: Towards a cycling level of service standard." Transportation Research Record, Issue 1438, pp. 9-16.
6. Fruin, J. J. (1971). Pedestrian planning and design, Metropolitan Association of Urban Designers and Environmental Planners in New York.
7. Jaskiewics, F. (2000). Pedestrian level of service based on trip quality, TRB Circular E-C019: Urban Street Symposium.
8. KLC (2009). Formulation of the road supply index based on the land use patterns and street functions for major residential areas, Korea Land Corporation, Sungnam-si.
9. KMOCT (1999). Design guide lines for road structures and facilities, Korea Ministry of Construction and Transportation, Gwacheoun-si.
10. KMOCT (2001). Korean highway capacity manual, Korea Ministry of Construction and Transportation, Gwacheoun-si.
11. Kockelman, K. M. (1997). "Travel behaviour as function of accessibility, land use mixing, and land use balance: Evidence from San Francisco Bay area." Transportation Research Record, Issue 1607, pp. 116-125.
12. Leake G. R., May A. D., and Pearson D. I. (1991). "Pedestrian's preferences for footway maintenance and design." Highways and Transportation, Vol. 38, No. 7, pp. 5-10.
13. Muraleethanran, T. and Hagiwara, T. (2007). "Overall level of service of urban walking environment and its influence on pedestrian route choice behaviour." Transportation Research Record, Issue 2002, pp. 7-17.
14. Navin, F. P. D. (1994). "Bicycle traffic flow characteristics: Experimental results and comparisons." ITE Journal, Vol. 64, No. 3, pp. 31-36.
15. Sisiopiku, V. P., Byrd, J., and Chittoor, A. (2007). "Application of level of service methods for evaluation of operations at pedestrian facilities." Transportation Research Record, Issue 2002, pp. 117-124.
16. Soot, S. (1991). "Trends in downtown pedestrian traffic and methods of estimating daily volumes." Transportation Research Record, Issue 1325, pp. 75-82.
17. Sorton, A. and Walsh, T. (1994). "Bicycle stress level as a tool to evaluate urban and suburban bicycle compatibility." Transportation Research Record, Issue 1438, pp. 17-24.
18. University of North Carolina (1999). Florida pedestrian planning and design handbook.