Understanding osteoblast responses to stiff nanotopographies through experiments and computational simulations

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 97 A, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 375-382

  Yang, Lei ^a   Chinthapenta, Viswanath ^a   Li, Qunyang ^a   Stout, David ^a   Liang, Amy ^a   Sheldon, Brian W ^a   Webster, Thomas J ^a,b  

^a Brown University   (United States)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

diamond; differentiation; filopdia; nanostructured surfaces; osteoblasts; simulation

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS; BONE-FORMING CELLS; CELL FUNCTIONS; CELL RESPONSE; CELL SPREADING; COMPUTATIONAL SIMULATION; DIFFERENTIATION; FILOPDIA; GRAIN SIZE; LATERAL DIMENSION; LIVE-CELL IMAGING; MATERIAL INTERFACES; NANOCRYSTALLINE DIAMONDS; NANOSTRUCTURED SURFACES; NANOTOPOGRAPHIES; NEW APPROACHES; OSTEOBLAST RESPONSE; SIMULATION; SUBMICRON; SURFACE FEATURE; TIME-PERIODS;

BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; CYTOLOGY; DIAMOND FILMS; DIAMONDS; GRAIN SIZE AND SHAPE; NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS; OSTEOBLASTS; SURFACES;

EXPERIMENTS;

DIAMOND; NANOCRYSTAL;

ARTICLE; CELL FUNCTION; CELL SPREADING; CELL STRUCTURE; FILOPODIUM; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; OSTEOBLAST; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SIMULATION; WETTABILITY;

CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SHAPE; CELL SURVIVAL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CRYSTALLIZATION; DIAMOND; DIFFUSION; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; NANOSTRUCTURES; OSTEOBLASTS; PSEUDOPODIA; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 79955644937     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.33094     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Discher DE, Janmey P, Wang YL,. Tissue cells feels and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 2005; 310: 1139-1143. (Pubitemid 41681732)
2. Ulrich TA, de Juan Pardo EM, Kumar S,. The mechanical rigidity of the extracellular matrix regulates the structure, motility, and proliferation of glioma cells. Cancer Res 2009; 69: 4167-4174.
3. Balasundaram G,. Nanomaterials for better orthopedics. In:, Webster TJ, editor. Nanotechnology for the Regeneration of Hard and Soft Tissues. Singapore: World Scientific; 2007. p 53-78.
4. Webster TJ, Ejiofor JU,. Increased osteoblast adhesion on nanostructured metals: Ti, Ti6Al4V, and CoCrMo. Biomaterials 2004; 19: 4731-4739. (Pubitemid 38561160)
5. Webster TJ, Ergun C, Doremus RH, Siegel RW, Bizios R,. Enhanced osteoblast functions on nanophase ceramics. Biomaterials 2000; 21: 1803-1810. (Pubitemid 30365044)
6. Yang L, Sheldon BW, Webster TJ,. Orthopedic nano diamond coatings: Control of surface properties and their impact on osteoblast adhesion and proliferation. J Biomed Mater Res 2009; 91A: 548-556.
7. Yang L, Sheldon BW, Webster TJ,. The impact of diamond nanocrystallinity on osteoblast functions. Biomaterials 2009; 30: 3458-3465.
8. Webster TJ, Waid MC, McKenzie JL, Price RL, Ejiofor JU,. Nano-biotechnology: Carbon nanofibres as improved neural and orthopaedic implants. Nanotechnology 2004; 15: 48-54.
9. Thapa A, Miller DC, Webster TJ, Haberstroh KM,. Nano-structured polymers enhance bladder smooth muscle cell function. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 2915-2926. (Pubitemid 36542991)
10. Webster TJ, Ergun C, Doremus RH, Siegel RW, Bizios R,. Specific proteins mediate enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res 2000; 51: 475-483. (Pubitemid 30452152)
11. Zhang L, Rakotondradany F, Myles AJ, Fenniri H, Webster TJ,. Arginine-glycine-aspartic acid modified rosette nanotube-hydrogel composites for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2009; 30: 1309-1320.
12. Wilson CJ, Clegg RE, Leavesley DI, Pearcy MJ,. Mediation of biomaterial-cell interactions by adsorbed proteins: A review. Tissue Eng 2005; 11: 1-18. (Pubitemid 40515171)
13. Arnold M, Cavalcanti-Adam EA, Glass R, Blmmel J, Eck W, Kantlehner M,. Activation of integrin function by nanopatterned adhesive interfaces. Chem Phys Chem 2004; 5: 383-388.
14. Yang L, Li Q, Chinthapenta V, Liang A, Sheldon BW, Webster TJ,. The impact of material nanotopography on cell functions and filopodia extension: Experiments and modeling. Mater Res Soc Symp Proc 2010; 1236: SS10-08-SS10-14.
15. Gupton SL, Gertler FB,. Filopodia: The finger that do the walking. Science STKE 2007; 400: re.5.
16. Shin JH, Mahadevan L, So PT, Matsudaira P,. Bending stiffness of a crystalline actin bundle. J Mol Biol 2004; 337: 255-261. (Pubitemid 38293396)
17. Qian J, Wang J, Gao H,. Lifetime and strength of adhesive molecular bond cluster between elastic media. Langmuir 2008; 24: 1262-1270. (Pubitemid 351345846)
18. Mongilner A, Rubinstein B,. The physics of filopodial protrusion. Biophys J 2005; 89: 782-795. (Pubitemid 41098966)
19. Folkman J, Moscona A,. Role of cell shape in growth control. Nature 1978; 273: 345-349. (Pubitemid 8344174)