Changed gene expression for candidate ageing genes in long-lived Bicyclus anynana butterflies

Experimental Gerontology

Volumn 46, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 426-434

  Pijpe, Jeroen ^a   Pul, Nicolien ^a   van Duijn, Sara ^a   Brakefield, Paul M ^a   Zwaan, Bas J ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Artificial selection; Catalase; Drosophila; Ecology; Indy; Sod2; Starvation resistance

Indexed keywords

AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; AGING; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL SELECTION; BUTTERFLY; CATALASE GENE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIETARY INTAKE; DOWN REGULATION; GENE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENETIC CORRELATION; GENETIC RESISTANCE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; INDY GENE; LIFESPAN; LONGEVITY; MALE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOD2 GENE; STARVATION; UPREGULATION;

AGING; ANIMALS; BUTTERFLIES; CATALASE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENES, INSECT; LONGEVITY; MODELS, ANIMAL; SUPEROXIDE DISMUTASE;

BICYCLUS; BICYCLUS ANYNANA; PAPILIONOIDEA;

EID: 79955638397     PISSN: 05315565     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2010.11.033     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Arking R., et al. Identical longevity phenotypes are characterized by different patterns of gene expression and oxidative damage. Exp. Gerontol. 2000, 35:353-373.
2. Arking R., et al. Forward and reverse selection for longevity in Drosophila is characterized by alteration of antioxidant gene expression and oxidative damage patterns. Exp. Gerontol. 2000, 35:167-185.
3. Ashburner M., et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat. Genet. 2000, 25:25-29.
4. Baldal E.A., et al. Multitrait evolution in lines of Drosophila melanogaster selected for increased starvation resistance: the role of metabolic rate and implications for the evolution of longevity. Evolution 2006, 60:1500-1509.
5. Beckman K.B., Ames B.N. The free radical theory of aging matures. Physiol. Rev. 1998, 78:547-581.
6. Beldade P., et al. A wing expressed sequence tag resource for Bicyclus anynana butterflies, an evo-devo model. BMC Genomics 2006, 7:130.
7. Brakefield P.M., Frankino W.A. Polyphenisms in Lepidoptera: multidisciplinary approaches to studies of evolution. Phenotypic Plasticity in Insects. Mechanisms and Consequences 2007, 121-152. Science Publishers, Inc., Plymouth, UK. T.N. Ananthakrishnan, D.W. Whitman (Eds.).
8. Brakefield P.M., Reitsma N. Phenotypic plasticity, seasonal climate and the population biology of Bicyclus butterflies (Satyridae) in Malawi. Ecol. Entomol. 1991, 16:291-303.
9. Brakefield P.M., et al. Developmental plasticity and acclimation both contribute to adaptive responses to alternating seasons of plenty and of stress in Bicyclus butterflies. J. Biosci. 2007, 32:465-475.
10. Brakefield P.M., et al. The African butterfly Bicyclus anynana: evolutionary genetics and evo-devo. Emerging Model Organisms: A Laboratory Manual 2009, 291-329. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. R.R. Behringer (Ed.).
11. Clancy D.J., et al. Extension of life-span by loss of CHICO, a Drosophila insulin receptor substrate protein. Nature 2001, 292:104-106.
12. de Jong, M.A., 2010, Geographic variation and thermal adaptation in Bicyclus anynana, PhD Thesis, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.
13. Dudas S.P., Arking R. A coordinate upregulation of antioxidant gene activities is associated with the delayed onset of senescence in a long-lived strain of Drosophila. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 1995, 50:B117-B127.
14. Duttaroy A., et al. A Sod2 null mutation confers severely reduced adult life span in Drosophila. Genetics 2003, 165:2295-2299.
15. Duvernell D.D., et al. Clines and adaptive evolution in the methuselah gene region in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Ecol. 2003, 12:1277-1285.
16. Flatt T. Assessing natural variation in genes affecting Drosophila lifespan. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2004, 125:155-159.
17. Foley P., Luckinbill L. The effects of selection for larval behaviour on adult life-history features in Drosophila melangaster. Evolution 2001, 55:2493-2502.
18. Friedman D.B., Johnson T.E. A mutation in the age-1 gene in Caenorhabditis elegans lengthens life and reduces hermaphrodite fertility. Genetics 1988, 118:75-86.
19. Geiger-Thornsberry G.L., Mackay T.F. Quantitative trait loci affecting natural variation in Drosophila longevity. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2004, 125:179-189.
20. Harbison S.T., et al. Quantitative trait loci affecting starvation resistance in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 2004, 166:1807-1823.
21. Hekimi S., Guarente L. Genetics and the specificity of the aging process. Science 2003, 299.
22. Hilliker A.J., et al. Urate-null rosy mutants of Drosophila melanogaster are hypersensitive to oxygen stress. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 1992, 89:4343-4347.
23. Kennedy B.K., et al. Mutation in the silencing gene S/R4 can delay aging in S. cerevisiae. Cell 1995, 80:485-496.
24. Kenyon C., et al. A C. elegans mutant that lives twice as long as wild type. Nature 1993, 366:461-464.
25. Klichko V.I., et al. Profiling catalase gene expression in Drosophila melanogaster during development and aging. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 2004, 56:34-50.
26. Knauf F., et al. Functional characterization and immonulocalization of the transporter encoded by the life-extending gene Indy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99:14315.
27. Lakowski B., Hekimi S. Determination of life-span in Caenorhabditis elegans by four clock genes. Science 1996, 272:1010-1013.
28. Landis G.N., Tower J. Superoxide dismutase evolution and life span regulation. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2005, 126:365-379.
29. Landis G.N., et al. Similar gene expression patterns characterize aging and oxidative stress in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101:7663-7668.
30. Leips J., et al. Quantitative Trait Loci with age-specific effects on fecundity in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 2006, 172:1595-1605.
31. Li Y., et al. Mapping determinants of gene expression plasticity by genetical genomics in C. elegans. PLoS Genet. 2006, 2(12):e222.
32. Lin Y., et al. Extended life-span and stress resistance in the Drosophila mutant methusalah. Science 1998, 282:943-946.
33. Marden J., et al. Conditional tradeoffs between aging and organismal performance of Indy long-lived mutant flies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 2003, 100:3369-3373.
34. Mockett R.J., et al. Antioxidant status and stress resistance in long- and short-lived lines of Drosophila melanogaster. Exp. Gerontol. 2001, 36:441-463.
35. Neretti N., et al. Long-lived Indy induces reduced mitochondrial reactive oxygen species production and oxidative damage. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106:2277-2282.
36. Orr W.C., Sohal R.S. Does overexpression of Cu, Zn-SOD extend life span in Drosophila melanogaster?. Exp. Gerontol. 2003, 38:227-230.
37. Partridge L., Gems D. Beyond the evolutionary theory of ageing, from functional genomics to evo-gero. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2006, 21:334-340.
38. Pfaffl M.W. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001, 29:e45.
39. Pijpe, J., 2007. The evolution of lifespan in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana, PhD Thesis, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
40. Pijpe J., et al. Consequences of artificial selection on pre-adult development for adult lifespan under benign conditions in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2006, 127:802-807.
41. Pijpe J., et al. Increased life span in a polyphenic butterfly artificially selected for starvation resistance. Am. Nat. 2008, 171:81-90.
42. Rogina B., et al. Extenden life-span confered by Cotransporter gene mutations in Drosophila. Science 2000, 290:2137-2140.
43. Rozen S., Skaletsky H.J. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. Bioinformatics Methods and Protocols: Methods in Molecular Biology 2000, 365-386. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. S. Krawetz, M.S. (Eds.).
44. Schmidt P.S., et al. Adaptive evolution of a candidate gene for aging in Drosophila. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97:10861-10865.
45. Spencer C.C., et al. Testing an 'aging gene' in long-lived Drosophila strains: increased longevity depends on sex and genetic background. Aging Cell 2003, 2:123-130.
46. Toivonen J.M., et al. No influence of Indy on lifespan in Drosophila after correction for genetic and cytoplasmic background effects. PLoS Genet. 2007, 3:e95.
47. Toivonen J.M., et al. Longevity of Indy mutant Drosophila not attributable to Indy mutation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106:E53. author reply E54.
48. Tyler R.H., et al. The effect of superoxide-dismutase alleles on aging in Drosophila. Genetica 1993, 91:143-149.
49. Vandesompele J., et al. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol. 2002, 3. research 34.1-11.
50. Van't Hof A.E., et al. Characterization of 28 microsatellite loci for the butterfly Bicyclus anynana. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2005, 5:169-172.
51. Wang P.Y., et al. Long-lived Indy and calorie restriction interact to extend life span. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106:9262-9267.
52. White K.P., et al. Microarray analysis of Drosophila development during metamorphosis. Science 1999, 286:2179-2184.