Evolution of stream-aquifer hydrologic connectedness during pumping - Experiment

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 402, Issue 3-4, 2011, Pages 401-414

  Wang, Wenke ^a   Li, Junting ^a   Feng, Xizhou ^a   Chen, Xunhong ^b   Yao, Kejun ^a  

^a CHANG'AN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

Evolution of stream groundwater relationship; Inverted water table; Stream aquifer interaction; Unsaturated zone

Indexed keywords

AQUIFER HETEROGENEITY; AQUIFER SYSTEMS; DYNAMIC PROCESS; EVOLUTION OF STREAM-GROUNDWATER RELATIONSHIP; GROUNDWATER PUMPING; HYDRAULIC HEADS; HYDROGEOLOGICAL CONDITIONS; INVERTED WATER TABLE; MANAGEMENT DECISIONS; PRESSURE HEADS; RESEARCH COMMUNITIES; SATURATED ZONE; STREAM GEOMETRY; STREAM-AQUIFER INTERACTION; STREAMBEDS; UNSATURATED ZONE; VERTICAL PROFILE; WATER TABLES;

AQUIFERS; DECISION MAKING; GROUNDWATER RESOURCES; HYDROGEOLOGY; PUMPS; RIVERS; WATER MANAGEMENT;

RECHARGING (UNDERGROUND WATERS);

AQUIFER CHARACTERIZATION; DECISION MAKING; DRAINAGE; GROUNDWATER-SURFACE WATER INTERACTION; HYDROLOGICAL REGIME; PHREATIC ZONE; STREAM BED; VADOSE ZONE; VERTICAL PROFILE; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER TABLE;

EID: 79955634459     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.03.033     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bouwer H. Theory of seepage from open channels. Advances in Hydroscience 1969, vol. 5:121-172. Academic Press, New York. V.T. Chow (Ed.).
2. Bouwer H., Maddock T. Making sense of the interaction between groundwater and streamflow: lessons for water masters and adjudicators. Rivers 1997, 6(1):19-31.
3. Bouwer H., Rice R.C. Delayed aquifer yield as a phenomenon of delayed air entry. Water Resources Research 1978, 14(6):1068-1074.
4. Brunner P., Cook P.G., Simmons C.T. Disconnected surface water to groundwater: from theory to practice. Ground Water 2010, 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2010.00752.x.
5. Carabin G., Dassargues A. Modeling ground water with ocean and river interaction. Water Resources Research 1999, 35(8):2347-2358.
6. Chen X.H., Chen X. Effects of aquifer anisotropy on the migration of infiltrated stream water to a pumping well. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 2003, 8(5):287-293.
7. Chen X.H., Yin Y. Streamflow depletion: modeling of reduced baseflow and induced stream infiltration from seasonally pumped wells. Journal of American Water Resources Association 2001, 37(1):185-195.
8. Chin D.A. Leakage of clogged channels that partially penetrate surficial aquifers. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 1991, 117(4):467-488.
9. Dillon P.J., Liggett A. An ephemeral strea - aquifer interaction model. Water Resources Research 1983, 19(3):621-626.
10. Fox G.A., Durnford D.S Unsaturated hyporheic zone flow in stream/aquifer conjunctive systems. Advances in Water Resources 2003, 26(9):989-1000.
11. Fox G.A., Gordji L. Consideration for unsaturated flow beneath a streambed during alluvial well depletion. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 2007, 12(2):139-145.
12. Glover R.E., Balmer C.G. River depletion from pumping a well near a river. American Geophysical Union Transactions 1954, 35(3):468-470.
13. Hantush M.S. Wells near streams with semipervious beds. Journal of Geophysical Research 1965, 70:2829-2838.
14. Hantush M.M. Modeling stream-aquifer interactions with linear response functions. Journal of Hydrology 2005, 311:59-79.
15. Hunt B. Unsteady stream depletion from groundwater pumping. Ground Water 1999, 37:98-102.
16. McDonald, M.G., Harbaugh, A.W., 1996. A Modular three-Dimensional Finite Difference Groundwater Model. US Geological Survey, Open File Report No. 6.
17. Niswonger, R.G., Prudic, D.E., 2005, Documentation of the Streamflow-Routing (SFR2) Package to Include Unsaturated Flow Beneath Streams-a Modification to SFR1: US Geological Techniques and Methods Book 6, Chapter A13, 47p.
18. Osman Y.Z., Bruen M.P. Modeling stream-aquifer seepage in an alluvial aquifer: an improved loosing-stream package for MODFLOW. Journal of Hydrology 2002, 264:69-86.
19. Parkin G., Birkinshaw S.J., Younger P.L., Rao Z., Kirk S. A numerical modeling and neural network approach to estimate the impact of groundwater abstractions on river flows. Journal of Hydrology 2007, 339:15-28.
20. Prickett, T.A., Lonnquist, C.G., 1971. Selected Digital Computer Techniques for Groundwater Resources Evaluation. Illinois State Water Survey, Bull. No. 55.
21. Rao N.H., Sarma P.B.S. Growth of groundwater mound in response to recharge. Ground Water 1980, 8(6):587-598.
22. Reid M.E., Dreiss S.J. Modeling the effects of unsaturated, stratified sediments on ground water recharge from intermittent streams. Journal of Hydrology 1990, 114:149-174.
23. Rovey, C.E.K., 1975. Numerical Model of Flow in Stream Aquifer System, Hydrology Paper No. 74, Colorado State University at Fort Collins, Colorado.
24. Rushton K. Discussion of unsteady stream depletion from ground water pumping. Ground Water 1999, 37(6):805.
25. Rushton K.R. Groundwater Hydrology: Conceptual and Computational Models 2003, Wiley, Chichester.
26. Rushton K.R. Representation in regional models of saturated river-aquifer interaction for gaining/losing rivers. Journal of Hydrology 2007, 334(1-2):262-281.
27. Sophocleous M. Interactions between groundwater and surface water: the state of the science. Hydrogeology Journal 2002, 10:52-67.
28. Sophocleous M.A., Koussis A., Martin J.L., Perkins S.P. Evaluation of simplified stream-aquifer depletion models for water rights administration. Ground Water 1995, 33(4):579-588.
29. Stephens D.B. Vadose Zone Hydrology 1995, CRC Lewis Publishers, New York, 347 p.
30. Stephens, D.B., Cox, W., Havlena, J., 1988. Field Study of Ephemeral Stream Channels, Water Resources Research Investigation Report No. 28, New Mexico Water Resources Research Institute, Las Cruces, NM.
31. Theis C.V. The effect of a well on the flow of a nearby stream. American Geophysical Union Transactions 1941, 22:734-738.
32. van Genuchten M.T. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1980, 44:892-898.
33. Winter T.C. Relation of stream, lakes and wetlands to groundwater flow systems. Hydrogeology Journal 1999, 7:28-45.
34. Winter, T.C., 2002. Subaqueous Capping and Natural Recovery: Understanding the Hydrogeologic Setting at Contaminated Sites. DOER Technical Notes Collection (TNDOER-C26), US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS.
35. Younger P.L., Mackay R.J., Connorton B.J. Streambed sediment as a barrier to groundwater pollution: insights from fieldwork and modeling in the River Tames basin. Journal of the Institution of Water and Environmental Management 1993, 7:577-585.
36. Zaslavsky D. Saturated and unsaturated flow in unstable porous medium. Soil Science 1964, 98(5):317-321.
37. Zaslavsky, D., 1965. The Significant of Water Head Measurements in Porous Material. RILEM Symposium on Transfer of Water in Porous Media, Paris, Bull. RILEM, No. 29, pp. 55-59.