Function spaces and optimal currents in impedance tomography

Journal of Inverse and Ill-Posed Problems

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 25-48

  Jin, Bangti ^a   Khan, Taufiquar ^b   Maass, Peter ^a   Pidcock, Michael ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BREMEN   (Germany)

^b CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c OXFORD BROOKES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adjoint; Electrical impedance tomography; Function space; Optimal currents

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955631905     PISSN: 09280219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/JIIP.2011.022     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. L. Borcea, Electrical impedance tomography, Inverse Problems 18 (2002), R99-R136.
2. M. Cheney and D. Isaacson, Distinguishability in impedance imaging, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 39 (1992), 852-860. (Pubitemid 23133316)
3. M. Cheney, D. Isaacson and J. C. Newell, Electrical impedance tomography, SIAM Rev. 41 (1999), 85-101. (Pubitemid 129723749)
4. M. Costabel, Boundary integral operators on Lipschitz domains: elementary results, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 19 (1988), 613-626.
5. E. Demidenko, A. Hartov, N. Soni and K. D. Paulsen, On optimal current patterns for electrical impedance tomography, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 52 (2005), 238-248. (Pubitemid 40188672)
6. D. C. Dobson and F. Santosa, Resolution and stability analysis of an inverse problem in electrical impedance tomography: dependence on the input current patterns, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 54 (1994), 1542-1560.
7. D. G. Gisser, D. Isaacson and J. C. Newell, Electrical current computed tomography and eigenvalues, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 50 (1990), 1623-1634.
8. G. H. Golub and C. F. van Loan, Matrix Computations, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1996.
9. M. Hanke and M. Brühl, Recent progress in electrical impedance tomography, Inverse Problems 19 (2003), S65-S90.
10. D. Isaacson, Distinguishability of conductivities by electric current computed tomography, IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 5 (1986), 91-95. (Pubitemid 16613325)
11. K. Ito and K. Kunisch, Maximizing robustness in nonlinear ill-posed inverse problems, SIAM J. Contr. Optim. 33 (1995), 643-666.
12. B. Jin, T. Khan and P. Maass, A reconstruction algorithm for electrical impedance tomography based on sparsity regularization, submitted.
13. J. P. Kaipio, A. Seppänen, E. Somersalo and H. Haario, Posterior covariance related optimal current patterns in electrical impedance tomography, Inverse Problems 20 (2004), 919-936.
14. J. P. Kaipio and E. Somersalo, Statistical and Computational Inverse Problems, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2004.
15. I. Knowles, A variational algorithm for electrical impedance tomography, Inverse Problems 14 (1998), 1513-1525. (Pubitemid 128553317)
16. I. Knowles, An optimal current functional for electrical impedance tomography. Preprint, 2004, Department of Mathematics, University of Alabama at Birmingham. Available at www.math.uab.edu/knowles/papers/dnopt.pdf
17. A. Köksal and B. M. Eyüboǧlu, Determination of optimum injected current patterns in electrical impedance tomography, Physiol. Meas. 16 (1995), A99-A109.
18. W. R. B. Lionheart, J. Kaipio and C. N. McLeod, Generalized optimal current patterns and electrical safety in EIT, Physiol. Meas. 22 (2001), 85-90. (Pubitemid 32186760)
19. M. Lukaschewitsch, P. Maass and M. Pidcock, Tikhonov regularization for electrical impedance tomography on unbounded domains, Inverse Problems 19 (2003), 585-610.
20. S. E. Mikhailov, About traces, extensions and co-normal derivative operators on Lipschitz domains. In: Integral Methods in Science and Engineering: Techniques and Applications (C. Constanda and S. Potapenko, eds.), pp. 149-160, Birkhäuser, Boston, 2007.