Perceived global flow direction reveals local vector weighting by luminance

Vision Research

Volumn 51, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 1129-1136

  Watamaniuk, Scott N J ^a   Sekuler, Robert ^b   McKee, Suzanne P ^c  

^a WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SMITH KETTLEWELL EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Contrast weighting; Correspondence; Direction discrimination; Motion perception; Random dots

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRESPONDENCE ANALYSIS; HUMAN; LUMINANCE; MONTE CARLO METHOD; MOTION ANALYSIS SYSTEM; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL DETECTION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL SYSTEM;

DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; LIGHTING; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SIGNAL DETECTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL;

EID: 79955616737     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Adelson E., Bergen J. Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optics and Image Science 1985, 2:284-299.
2. Anstis S. The perception of apparent movement. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 1980, 290:153-168.
3. Anstis, S., Ito, H. (2002). Vector summation in split-dot motion. Paper presented at the Visual Sciences Society annual meeting, Sarasota, FL.
4. Anstis S.M., Mather G. Effects of luminance and contrast on direction of ambiguous apparent motion. Perception 1985, 14:167-180.
5. Bennett P.J., Sekuler R., Sekuler A.B. The effects of aging on motion detection and direction identification. Vision Research 2007, 47:799-809.
6. Braddick O.J. A short-range process in apparent motion. Vision Research 1974, 14:519-527.
7. Burt P., Sperling G. Time, distance, and feature trade-offs in visual apparent motion. Psychological Review 1981, 88:171-195.
8. Dawson M. The how and why of what went where in apparent motion: Modeling solutions to the motion correspondence problem. Psychological Review 1991, 98:569-603.
9. Eagle R.A., Hogervorst M.A., Blake A. Does the visual system exploit projective geometry to help solve the motion correspondence problem?. Vision Research 1999, 39:373-385.
10. Edwards M., Badcock D.R. Global motion perception: Interaction of the on and off pathways. Vision Research 1994, 34:2849-2858.
11. Edwards M., Badcock D.R., Nishida S. Contrast sensitivity of the motion system. Vision Research 1996, 36:2411-2421.
12. Gorea A., Papathomas T.V. Motion processing by chromatic and achromatic visual pathways. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optics and Image Science 1989, 6:590-602.
13. Gorea A., Papathomas T.V., Kovacs I. Motion perception with spatiotemporally matched chromatic and achromatic information reveals a "slow" and a "fast" motion system. Vision Research 1993, 33:2515-2534.
14. Green M. What determines correspondence strength in apparent motion?. Vision Research 1986, 26:599-607.
15. Green M. Color correspondence in apparent motion. Perception & Psychophysics 1989, 45:15-20.
16. Hibbard P.B., Bradshaw M.F., Eagle R.A. Cue combination in the motion correspondence problem. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 2000, 267:1369-1374.
17. Hildreth E. Computational studies of the extraction of visual spatial information from binocular and motion cues. Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology 1988, 66:464-477.
18. Kolers P.A. Aspects of motion perception 1972, Pergamon Press, New York.
19. Mack A., Klein L., Hill J., Palumbo D. Apparent motion: Evidence of the influence of shape, slant, and size on the correspondence process. Perception & Psychophysics 1989, 46:201-206.
20. Marr D., Poggio T. A computational theory of human signal vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 1979, 204:301-328.
21. Morgan M.J., Chubb C. Contrast facilitation in motion detection: Evidence for a Reichardt detector in human vision. Vision Research 1999, 39:4217-4231.
22. Nakayama K., Silverman G.H. Detection and discrimination of sinusoidal grating displacements. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optics and Image Science 1985, 2:267-274.
23. Newsome W.T., Paré E.B. A selective impairment of motion perception following lesions of the middle temporal visual area (MT). Journal of Neuroscience 1988, 8:2201-2211.
24. Nishida S., Ohtani Y., Ejima Y. Inhibitory interaction in a split/fusion apparent motion: Lack of spatial-frequency selectivity. Vision Research 1992, 32:1523-1534.
25. Nishida S., Takeuchi T. The effects of luminance on affinity of apparent motion. Vision Research 1990, 30:709-721.
26. Pantle A., Hicks K. Using low-level filters to encode spatial displacements of visual stimuli. Spatial Vision 1985, 1:69-82.
27. Papathomas T.V., Gorea A., Julesz B. Two carriers for motion perception: Color and luminance. Vision Research 1991, 31:1883-1892.
28. Petrov Y. Higher-contrast is preferred to equal-contrast in stereo-matching. Vision Research 2004, 44:775-784.
29. Quick R.F. A vector-magnitude model for contrast detection. Kybernetik 1974, 16:65-67.
30. Schuling F.H., Altena P., Mastebroek H.A. The computational measurement of apparent motion: A recurrent pattern recognition strategy as an approach to solve the correspondence problem. Biological Cybernetics 1990, 62:463-473.
31. Sekuler A.B., Bennett P.J. Spatial phase differences can drive apparent motion. Perception & Psychophysics 1996, 58:174-190.
32. Shechter S., Hochstein S. Size, flux and luminance effects in the apparent motion correspondence process. Vision Research 1989, 29:579-591.
33. Shechter S., Hochstein S., Hillman P. Shape similarity and distance disparity as apparent motion correspondence cues. Vision Research 1988, 28:1013-1021.
34. Simoncelli E.P., Heeger D.J. A model of neural responses in visual area MT. Vision Research 1998, 38:743-761.
35. Smith A.T., Snowden R.J., Milne A.B. Is global motion really based on spatial integration of local motion signals?. Vision Research 1994, 34:2425-2430.
36. Snowden R.J., Braddick O.J. The temporal integration and resolution of velocity signals. Vision Research 1991, 31:907-914.
37. Ullman S. The interpretation of visual motion 1979, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
38. van Doorn A.J., Koenderink J.J. Temporal properties of the visual detectability of moving spatial white noise. Experimental Brain Research 1982, 45:179-188.
39. van Doorn A.J., Koenderink J.J. Spatial properties of the visual detectability of moving spatial white noise. Experimental Brain Research 1982, 45:189-195.
40. Van Santen J.P.H., Sperling G. Elaborated Reichardt detectors. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optics and Image Science 1985, 2:300-321.
41. Watamaniuk S.N.J., Sekuler R. Temporal and spatial integration in dynamic random dot stimuli. Vision Research 1992, 32:2341-2347.
42. Watamaniuk S.N.J., Sekuler R., Williams D.W. Direction perception in complex dynamic displays: The integration of direction information. Vision Research 1989, 29:47-59.
43. Watson A.B., Ahumada A.J. Model of human visual-motion sensing. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optics and Image Science 1985, 2:322-342.
44. Wetherill G.B., Levitt H. Sequential estimation of points on a psychometric function. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 1965, 18:1-10.
45. Williams D.W., Sekuler R. Coherent global motion percepts from stochastic local motions. Vision Research 1984, 24:55-62.
46. Williams D.W., Tweten S., Sekuler R. Using metamers to explore motion perception. Vision Research 1991, 31:275-286.