The evolving paradigm of revascularization for wound healing: Which intervention for which wound?

Wounds

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 49-52

  Kirksey, Lee ^a   Troiano, Michael ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b PENN PRESBYTERIAN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955606932     PISSN: 10447946     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Schillinger M, Sabeti S, Loewe C, et al. Balloon angioplas-ty versus implantation of nitinol stents in the superficial femoral artery. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(18):1879-1888. (Pubitemid 43872689)
2. McKinsey J F, Goldstein L, Khan HU, et al. Novel treatment of patients with lower extremity ischemia: use of percutaneous atherectomy in 579 lesions. Ann Surg. 2008:248(4):519-528.
3. Adam DJ, Beard JD, Cleveland T, et al. Bypass versus angioplasty in severe ischaemia of the leg (BASIL): mul-ticentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;366(9501):1925-1934. (Pubitemid 41713982)
4. Bradbury AW, Adam DJ, Bell J, et al. Bypass versus Angioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg (BASIL) trial: An intention-to-treat analysis of amputation-free and overall survival in patients randomized to a bypass surgery-first or a balloon angioplasty-first revascularization strategy. J Vasc Surg. 2010;51(5 Suppl):5S-17S.
5. Ballard JL, Killeen JD, Bunt TJ, Malone JM. Autologous saphenous vein popliteal-tibial artery bypass for limb-threatening ischemia: a reassessment. Am J Surg. 1995;170(3):251-255.