Revealing boundary-contour based surface representation through the time course of binocular rivalry

Vision Research

Volumn 51, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 1288-1296

  Su, Yong R ^a,b   He, Zijiang J ^b   Ooi, Teng Leng ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE   (United States)

Author keywords

Border to interior strategy; Boundary contour; Global dominance; Interocular inhibition; Reaction time; Surface integration

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BINOCULAR RIVALRY STIMULUS; BINOCULAR VISION; BOUNDARY CONTOUR; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE DOMINANCE; GLOBAL DOMINANCE PERCEPT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; STIMULUS DURATION; TIME; VISUAL STIMULATION;

CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DOMINANCE, OCULAR; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; VISION, BINOCULAR;

EID: 79955605789     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.04.005     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Alais D., Blake R. Interactions between global motion and local binocular rivalry. Vision Research 1998, 38:637-644.
2. Blake R. A neural theory of binocular rivalry. Psychological Review 1989, 96:145-167.
3. Blake R., Westendorf D.H., Overton R. What is suppressed during binocular rivalry?. Perception 1980, 9:223-231.
4. Brainard D.H. The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision 1997, 10:433-436.
5. Caputo G. Texture brightness filling-in. Vision Research 1998, 38:841-851.
6. Fox R. Binocular rivalry. Vision and visual dysfunction. Binocular vision 1991, Vol. 9:93-110. Macmillan, London.
7. Frisby J.P., Mayhew J.E.W. The relationship between apparent depth and disparity in rivalrous-texture stereogram. Perception 1978, 7:661-678.
8. Grossberg S., Mingolla E. Neural dynamics of form perception: boundary completion, illusory figures, and neon color spreading. Psychological Review 1985, 92:173-211.
9. Hering E. Spatial sense and movements of the eye (Radde, C., Transl.) 1942, American Academy of Optometry, Baltimore, MD.
10. Kaufman L. Sight and mind 1974, Oxford University Press, New York.
11. Kovács I., Papathomas T.V., Yang M., Fehér Á. When the brain changes its mind: interocular grouping during interocular rivalry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 1996, 93:15508-15511.
12. Lamme V.A. The neurophysiology of figure-ground segregation in primary visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 1995, 15:1605-1615.
13. Lee S., Blake R. A fresh look at interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Vision Research 2004, 44:983-991.
14. Levelt W. On binocular rivalry 1965, Royal Van Gorcum, Assen, The Netherlands.
15. Motoyoshi I. Texture filling-in and texture segregation revealed by transient masking. Vision Research 1999, 39:1285-1291.
16. Nguyen V., Freeman A., Alais D. Increasing depth of binocular rivalry suppression along two visual pathways. Vision Research 2003, 43:2003-2008.
17. Nothdurft H.C., Gallant J.L., van Essen D.C. Response profiles to texture border patterns in area V1. Visual Neuroscience 2000, 17:421-436.
18. Ooi T.L., He Z.J. Sensory eye dominance. Journal of the American Optometric Association 2001, 72(3):168-178.
19. Ooi T.L., He Z.J. Surface representation and attention modulation mechanisms in binocular rivalry. Binocular rivalry 2005, 117-135. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. D. Alais, R. Blake (Eds.).
20. Ooi T.L., He Z.J. Binocular rivalry and surface-boundary processing. Perception 2006, 35:581-603.
21. Ooi T.L., Loop M.S. Visual suppression and its effect upon color and luminance sensitivity. Vision Research 1994, 34:2997-3003.
22. O'Shea R.P., Crassini B. The sensitivity of binocular rivalry suppression to changes in orientation assessed by reaction-time and forced-choice techniques. Perception 1981, 10:283-293.
23. Papathomas T.V., Kovács I., Conway T. Interocular grouping in binocular rivalry: attributes and combinations. Binocular rivalry 2005, 155-168. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. D. Alais, R. Blake (Eds.).
24. Paradiso M.A., Nakayama K. Brightness perception and filling-in. Vision Research 1991, 31:1221-1236.
25. Pelli D.G. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision 1997, 10:437-442.
26. Qiu F.T., von der Heydt R. Figure and ground in the visual cortex: V2 combines stereoscopic cues with Gestalt rules. Neuron 2005, 47:155-166.
27. Shimojo S., Nakayama K. Real world occlusion constraints and binocular rivalry. Vision Research 1990, 30:69-80.
28. Smith E.L., Levi D.M., Harwerth R.S., White J.M. Color vision is altered during the suppression phase of binocular rivalry. Science 1982, 218:802-804.
29. Su, R.Y., He, Z.J., Ooi, T.L., 2011. Seeing grating-textured surface begins at the border. Journal of Vision, 11(1):14, 1-14. doi:10.1167/11.1.14. http://www.journalofvision.org/content/11/1/14.
30. Su Y., He Z.J., Ooi T.L. Coexistence of binocular integration and suppression determined by surface border information. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 2009, 106:15990-15995.
31. Su R.Y., He Z.J., Ooi T.L. The magnitude and dynamics of interocular suppression affected by monocular boundary contour and conflicting local features. Vision Research 2010, 50:2037-2047.
32. Suzuki S., Grabowecky M. Evidence for perceptual " trapping" and adaptation in multistable binocular rivalry. Neuron 2002, 36:143-157.
33. Suzuki S., Grabowecky M. Long-term speeding in perceptual switches mediated by attention-dependent plasticity in cortical visual processing. Neuron 2007, 56:741-753.
34. Treisman A. Binocular rivalry and stereoscopic depth perception. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1962, 14:23-37.
35. van Bogaert E.A., Ooi T.L., He Z.J. The monocular boundary contour mechanism in binocular surface representation and suppression. Perception 2008, 37:1197-1215.
36. von Helmholtz H. Treatise on physiological optics, Vol. 3 (Southall, J.P.C., Transl.) 1962, Dover, New York.
37. Watanabe T., Cavanagh P. Texture and motion spreading, transparency and the aperture problem. Perception & Psychophysics 1991, 50:459-464.
38. Watanabe K., Paik Y., Blake R. Preserved gain control for luminance contrast during binocular rivalry suppression. Vision Research 2004, 44:3065-3071.
39. Wilson H.R., Blake R., Lee S. Dynamics of travelling waves in visual perception. Nature 2001, 412:907-910.
40. Wolfe J.M. Influence of spatial frequency, luminance, and duration on binocular rivalry and abnormal fusion of briefly presented dichoptic stimuli. Perception 1983, 12:447-456.
41. Wolfe J.M. Stereopsis and binocular rivalry. Psychological Review 1986, 93:269-282.
42. Wolfe J.M. Parallel ideas about stereopsis and binocular rivalry: a reply to Blake and O'Shea. Psychological Review 1988, 95:155-158.
43. Xu J., He Z.J., Ooi T.L. Sensory eye dominance is retinal location specific and affects stereopsis. Journal of Vision 2008, 8(6):1089. 14. 10.1167/8.6.1089.
44. Xu J., He Z.J., Ooi T.L. Surface boundary contour strengthens image dominance in binocular competition. Vision Research 2010, 50:155-170.
45. Zhou H., Friedman H.S., von der Heydt R. Coding of border ownership in monkey visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 2000, 20:6594-6611.