Better performance with two eyes than with one in stereo-blind subjects' judgments of motion in depth

Vision Research

Volumn 51, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 1249-1253

  van Mierlo, Christa M ^a   Brenner, Eli ^a   Smeets, Jeroen B J ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Binocular disparity; Binocular summation; Probability summation; Stereopsis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; EYE DOMINANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROTATION; STEREO BLIND; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT; VISUAL STIMULATION;

DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MOTION PERCEPTION; PERCEPTUAL DISORDERS; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISION, MONOCULAR;

EID: 79955604132     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.03.015     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Andrews D.P. Perception of contour orientation in the central fovea. I: Short lines. Vision Research 1967, 7:975-997.
2. Baker D.H., Meese T.S., Mansouri B., Hess R.F. Binocular summation of contrast remains intact in strabismic amblyopia. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2007, 48:5332-5338.
3. Banton T., Levi D.M. Binocular summation in vernier acuity. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. Optics and Image Science 1991, 8:673-680.
4. Bearse M.A., Freeman R.D. Binocular summation in orientation discrimination depends on stimulus contrast and duration. Vision Research 1994, 34:19-29.
5. Blake R., Fox R. The psychophysical inquiry into binocular summation. Perception & Psychophysics 1973, 14:161-185.
6. Blake R., Sloane M., Fox R. Further developments in binocular summation. Perception & Psychophysics 1981, 30:266-276.
7. Brooks K. Interocular velocity difference contributes to stereo motion speed perception. Journal of Vision 2002, 2(3):218-231. [3].
8. Fernandez J.M., Farell B. Motion in depth from interocular velocity differences revealed by differential motion aftereffect. Vision Research 2006, 46:1307-1317.
9. Frisen L., Lindblom B. Binocular summation in humans: Evidence for a hierarchical model. Journal of Physiology 1988, 402:773-782.
10. Girshick A.R., Banks M.S. Probabilistic combination of slant information: Weighted averaging and robustness as optimal percepts. Journal of Vision 2009, 9(9):1-20. [8].
11. Harris J.M., Nefs H.T., Grafton C.E. Binocular vision and motion-in-depth. Spatial Vision 2008, 21:531-547.
12. Hess R.F., Mansouri B., Thompson B., Gheorghiu E. Latent stereopsis for motion in depth in strabismic amblyopia. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2009, 50:5006-5016.
13. Hillis J.M., Watt S.J., Landy M.S., Banks M.S. Slant from texture and disparity cues: Optimal cue combination. Journal of Vision 2004, 4(12):967-992.
14. Knill D.C., Saunders J.A. Do humans optimally integrate stereo and texture information for judgments of surface slant?. Vision Research 2003, 43:2539-2558.
15. Legge G.E. Binocular contrast summation I. Detection and discrimination. Vision Research 1984, 24:373-383.
16. Levi D.M., Pass A.F., Manny R.E. Binocular interactions in normal and anomalous binocular vision: Effects of flicker. British Journal of Ophthalmology 1982, 66:57-63.
17. Nefs H.T., O'Hare L., Harris J.M. Two independent mechanisms for motion-in-depth perception: Evidence from individual differences. Front Psychology 2010, 1:155. 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00155.
18. Rokers B., Cormack L.K., Huk A.C. Strong percepts of motion through depth without strong percepts of position in depth. Journal of Vision 2008, 8(4):1-10. [6].
19. Westendorf D.H., Langston A., Chambers D., Allegretti C. Binocular detection by normal and stereo-blind observers. Perception & Psychophysics 1978, 24:209-214.