Automated selection of value efficient buildings refurbishment alternatives

ISARC 2008 - Proceedings from the 25th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 312-317

  Kaklauskas, Arturas ^a   Tupenaite, Laura ^a   Kanapeckiene, Loreta ^a  

^a VILNIUS GEDIMINAS TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

Author keywords

Automated selection of alternatives; Investments; Refurbishment; Value efficiency

Indexed keywords

INVESTMENTS;

AUTOMATED SELECTION; AUTOMATED SYSTEMS; AUTOMATED TOOLS; BUILDING CONDITIONS; EFFICIENT BUILDINGS; MARKET VALUES; REFURBISHMENT;

ROBOTICS;

EID: 79955597816     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3846/isarc.20080626.312     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Martinaitis, V., Rogoza, A. and Bikmaniene, I. (2004) Criterion to evaluate the "twofold benefit" of the renovation of buildings and their elements, Energy and buildings, No. 36, 3-8.
2. Sweeney, J.L. (1974) Quality, commodity hierarchies and housing market, Econometrica, Vol.42, No. 1, 147-167.
3. Dildine, L.L. and Massey, F.A. (1974) Dynamic Model of private incentives to housing maintenance, Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 40, 631-639.
4. Arnott, R., Davidson, R. and Pines, D. (1983) Housing quality, maintenance and rehabilitation, Review of Economic Studies, Vol.50, 467-494.
5. Mansfied, J.R. (2000) Investment Potential within the residential private rented sector, Property Management, Vol. 18, No. 1, 35-45.
6. Chau, K.W., Leung, A.Y.T., Yiu, C.Y. and Wong, S.K. (2003) Estimating the value enhancement effects of refurbishment, Facilities.Vol. 21, No. 1/2, 13-19.
7. Mao, J.T. (1966) Efficiency in public urban renewal expenditure through benefits and cost analysis, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, Vol. 32, No. 2, 95-107.
8. Ruthenberg, J. (1976) Economic Evaluation of Urban Renewal. Bookings, Washington, DC.
9. Adeli, H. (1988) Expert Systems in Construction and Structural Engineering, Chapman & Hall, New York City, NY, 1988.
10. Henket, H.A.J. (1990). Choosing an Appropriate Intervention in Existing Building: A Theoretical Model. In: Kiang, Q.L. Ed., Proceedings of the International Symposium on Property Management and Modernization, Singapore, 7-9 March, 473-482.
11. Reddy, P.V., Socur, M. and Ariaratnam, S.T. (1993). Building Renovation Decision Support Model, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering, Anaheim, CA, USA, 1547-1554.
12. Allane, K. (2004) Selection of renovation actions using multi-criteria "knapsack" model, Automation and construction, Vol 13, Issue 3, 377-391.
13. Zavadskas, E.K. and Kaklauskas, A. (1999). A new method of complex evaluation of projects based on multiple criteria analysis and the principle of proportionality. in: D. K. Despotis, C. Zopounidis (Eds.), Integrating Technology & Human Decisions: Global Bridges into the 21st Century, Vol II, Proceedings of 5th International Conference, Athens, Greece, 2051-2053.
14. Zavadskas, E.K., Kaklauskas, A. and Raslanas, S. (2004) Evaluation of Investments into Housing Renovation, International Journal of Strategic Property Management, Vol. 8, No. 3, 177-190.
15. Zavadskas E. K., Antuchevichiene J. (2007) Multiple criteria evaluation of rural buildings regeneration alternatives, Building and Environment, Vol. 42, 436-451. (Pubitemid 44426583)
16. Kaklauskas, A., Gulbinas, A., Naimavičienė, J. and Kanapeckienė, L. (2006) Automated models for building's retrofit. Proceedings of the International Conference "Buildings Energy Efficiency in the Baltics (BENEFIT-2006)", October 25, 2006, Riga, Latvia, 298-334.