GPS monitoring of the Fatih Sultan Mehmet suspension bridge by using assessment methods of neural networks

International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives

Volumn 35, Issue , 2004, Pages 702-707

  Akyilmaz, O ^a   Celik R N ^a   Apaydin, N ^b   Ayan, T ^a  

^a ISTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b 17 Regional Headquarters of Highways ^*  (Turkey)

Author keywords

Artificial neural networks; Geodesy; Modelling; Monitoring; Prediction

Indexed keywords

COMPLEX NETWORKS; DEFORMATION; DISASTER PREVENTION; DISASTERS; EARTHQUAKES; FORECASTING; GEODESY; GEODETIC SATELLITES; GEOPHYSICS; METEOROLOGY; MODELS; MONITORING; NEURAL NETWORKS; RISK ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOFT COMPUTING; SUSPENSION BRIDGES;

CONTINUOUS MONITORING SYSTEMS; DEFORMATION PROCESS; DEFORMING OBJECTS; DISASTER MANAGEMENT; ENGINEERING STRUCTURES; NORTH ANATOLIAN FAULT ZONE; SOFT COMPUTING METHODS; TRAFFIC VOLUMES;

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT;

EID: 79955592432     PISSN: 16821750     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. Bishop, C. M., 1995. Neural networks for pattern recognition. Oxford University Press.
2. Chatfield, C., 1975. The analysis of time series: an introduction. Chapman and Hall.
3. Haykin, S., 1994. Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation, Maxwell Macmillan Int., New York.
4. Heine, K. 1999. Beschreibung von Deformationsprozessen durch Volterra und Fuzzy Modelle sowie Neuronale Netze. Dissertation. Deutsche Geodaetische Kommission, Reihe C, Heft No. 516
5. Heunecke, O., Pelzer, H., 1998. A new terminology for deformation analysis models based on system theory. In: Kahmen H., Brückl E., Wunderlich T. (Eds.): IAG Symposium on Geodesy for Geotechnical and Structural Engineering, Eisenstadt, April 20-22, pp. 285-292
6. Heunecke, O., 1995. Zur Identifikation und Verifikation von Deformationsprozessen mittels adaptiver Kalman-Filterung (Hannoversches Filter). Wissenschaftliche Arbeiten der fachrichtung Vermessungswesen der Universtaet Hannover, No. 208, Hannover.
7. Miima, J. B., Niemeier, W., 2004. Adapting neural networks for modelling structural behavior in geodetic deformation monitoring, ZfV, to be published.
8. Miima, J. B., Niemeier, W., Kraus, B., 2001. A neural network approach to modelling geodetic deformations. In: Carosio A., Kutterer H. (Eds): First International Symposium on Robust Statistics and Fuzzy Techniques in Geodesy and GIS, ETH Zurich, March 12-16, pp. 111-116.
9. Pfeufer, A., 1994. Classification of models for geodetic examination of deformations. Final paper of the Ad Hoc Committee on Classification on Models and Terminology. By G. Milev, A. Pfeufer, W. Proszynski, G. Steinberg, W. Teskey, W. Welsch, In: Perelmuter Workshop on Dynamic Deformation Models, August 29- September,1 Haifa.
10. Welsch, W., Heunecke, O., 1999. Terminology and Classification of Deformation Models. In: 9th International FIGSymposium on Deformation Measurements, Olsztyn, September 27-30, pp. 416-429
11. Welsch, W., 1996. Geodetic analysis of dynamic processes: Classification and terminology. 8th International Symposium on Deformation Measurements, Hong Kong, June 25 - 28, pp. 147-156