Topology of a maize field: Distinguishing the influence of end-of-day far-red light and shade avoidance syndrome on plant height

Plant Signaling and Behavior

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 467-470

  Dubois, Patrice G ^a,b   Brutnell, Thomas P ^c  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^b Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research   (United States)

^c Campus Guanajuato   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Dusk; End of day far red; Maize; Phytochrome; Shade avoidance syndrome; Twilight; Zea mays

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; LIGHT; MAIZE; METABOLISM; RADIATION EXPOSURE;

LIGHT; ZEA MAYS;

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 79955587978     PISSN: 15592316     EISSN: 15592324     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/psb.6.4.14305     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Keuskamp DH, Sasidharan R, Pierik R. Physiological regulation and functional significance of shade avoidance responses to neighbors. Plant Signal Behav 2010; 5:655-62.
2. Gonzalo M, Holland JB, Vyn TJ, McIntyre LM. Direct mapping of density response in a population of B73 x Mo17 recombinant inbred lines of maize (Zea mays L.). Heredity 2010; 104:583-99.
3. Liu JB, Mahoney KJ, Sikkema PH, Swanton CJ. The importance of light quality in crop-weed competition. Weed Sci 2009; 49:217-24.
4. Maddonni GA, Otegui ME, Andrieu B, Chelle M, Casal JJ. Maize leaves turn away from neighbors. Plant Physiol 2002; 130:1181-9.
5. von Wettberg EJ, Remington DL, Schmitt J. Partitioning adaptive differentiation across a patchy landscape: shade avoidance traits in Impatiens capensis. Evolution 2008; 62:654-67.
6. Rajcan I, Chandler KJ, Swanton CJ. Red-far-red ratio of reflected light: A hypothesis of why early season weed control is important in corn. Weed Sci 2004; 52:774-8.
7. Kebrom TH, Burson BL, Finlayson SA. Phytochrome B represses Teosinte Branched1 expression and induces sorghum axillary bud outgrowth in response to light signals. Plant Physiol 2006; 140:1109-17.
8. Fankhauser C, Casal JJ. Phenotypic characterization of a photomorphogenic mutant. Plant J 2004; 39:747-60.
9. Kasperbauer MJ. Spectral distribution of light in a tobacco canopy and effects of end-of-day light quality on growth and development. Plant Physiol 1971; 47:775-8.
10. McKenzie JS, Weiser CJ, Burke MJ. Effects of red and far red light on the initiation of cold acclimation in Cornus stolonifera Michx. Plant Physiol 1974; 53:783-9.
11. Dubois PG, Olsefski GT, Flint-Garcia S, Setter TL, Hoekenga OA, Brutnell TP. Physiological and genetic characterization of end-of-day far-red light response in maize seedlings. Plant Physiol 2010; 154:173-86.
12. Gorton HL, Briggs WR. Phytochrome responses to end-of-day irradiations in light-grown corn grown in the presence and absence of Sandoz 9789. Plant Physiol 1980; 66:1024-6.
13. Franklin KA, Praekelt U, Stoddart WM, Billingham OE, Halliday KJ, Whitelam GC. Phytochromes B, D and E act redundantly to control multiple physiological responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2003; 131:1340-6.
14. Kozuka T, Kobayashi J, Horiguchi G, Demura T, Sakakibara H, Tsukaya H, et al. Involvement of auxin and brassinosteroid in the regulation of petiole elongation under the shade. Plant Physiol 2010; 153:1608-18.
15. Nagatani A, Reed JW, Chory J. Isolation and initial characterization of Arabidopsis mutants that are deficient in phytochrome A. Plant Physiol 1993; 102:269-77.
16. Robson P, Whitelam GC, Smith H. Selected components of the shade-avoidance syndrome are displayed in a normal manner in mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana and Brassica rapa deficient in phytochrome B. Plant Physiol 1993; 102:1179-84.
17. Smith H. Light quality, photoperception and plant strategy. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 1982; 33:481-518.
18. Hughes JE, Morgan DC, Lambton PA, Black CR, Smith H. Photoperiodic time signals during twilight. Plant Cell Environ 1984; 7:269-77.
19. Linkosalo T, Lechowicz MJ. Twilight far-red treatment advances leaf bud burst of silver birch (Betula pendula). Tree Physiol 2006; 26:1249-56.
20. Franklin KA, Whitelam GC. Light-quality regulation of freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat Genet 2007; 39:1410-3.
21. McMullen MD, Kresovich S, Villeda HS, Bradbury P, Li H, Sun Q, et al. Genetic properties of the maize nested association mapping population. Science 2009; 325:737-40.
22. Lee M, Sharopova N, Beavis WD, Grant D, Katt M, Blair D, et al. Expanding the genetic map of maize with the intermated B73 x Mo17 (IBM) population. Plant Mol Biol 2002; 48:453-61.
23. Flint-Garcia SA, Thuillet AC, Yu J, Pressoir G, Romero SM, Mitchell SE, et al. Maize association population: a high-resolution platform for quantitative trait locus dissection. Plant J 2005; 44:1054-64.
24. Sheehan MJ, Kennedy LM, Costich DE, Brutnell TP. Subfunctionalization of PhyB1 and PhyB2 in the control of seedling and mature plant traits in maize. Plant J 2007; 49:338-53.
25. Sawers RJ, Sheehan MJ, Brutnell TP. Cereal phytochromes: targets of selection, targets for manipulation? Trends Plant Sci 2005; 10:138-43.
26. Ballare CL. Illuminated behaviour: phytochrome as a key regulator of light foraging and plant anti-herbivore defence. Plant Cell Environ 2009; 32:713-25.