Histological diagnosis by EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy in pancreatic solid masses without on-site cytopathologist: A single-center experience

Digestive Endoscopy

Volumn 23, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2011, Pages 34-38

  Itoi, Takao ^a   Tsuchiya, Takayoshi ^a   Itokawa, Fumihide ^a   Sofuni, Atsushi ^a   Kurihara, Toshio ^a   Tsuji, Shujiro ^a   Ikeuchi, Nobuhito ^a  

^a TOKYO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS); EUS guided fine needle aspiration; Pancreatic mass

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASPIRATION BIOPSY; BLEEDING; DEVICE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PANCREAS TUMOR; PREDICTIVE VALUE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY, FINE-NEEDLE; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; ENDOSONOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 79955582789     PISSN: 09155635     EISSN: 14431661     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2011.01142.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Hawes RH. Endoscopic ultrasound. Gastrointest. Clin. N. Am. 2000; 10: 161-74. viii.
2. Vilmann P, Jacobsen GK, Henriksen FW, Hancke S. Endoscopic ultrasonography with guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in pancreatic disease. Gastrointest. Endosc. 1992; 38: 172-3.
3. Wiersema MJ, Vilmann P, Giovannini M et al. Endosonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy: Diagnostic accuracy and complication assessment. Gastroenterology 1997; 112: 1087-95. (Pubitemid 27157518)
4. Yamao K, Ohashi K, Mizutani S et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for the diagnosis of digestive diseases. Endoscopy 1998; 30: A176-8.
5. Mallery JS, Centeno B, Hahn PF et al. Pancreatic tissue sampling guided by EUS, CT/US, and surgery:A comparison of sensitivity and specificity. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2002; 56: 218-24.
6. Chang KJ, Nguyen PM, Erickson RA et al. The clinical utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic carcinoma. Gastrointest. Endosc. 1997; 45: 387-93.
7. Bhutani MS, Hawes RH, Baron PL et al. Endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration of malignant pancreatic lesions. Endoscopy 1997; 29: 854-8. (Pubitemid 28043602)
8. Giovannini M, Seitz JF, Monges G et al. Fine-needle aspiration cytology guided by endoscopic ultrasonography: Results in 141 patients. Endoscopy 1995; 27: 171-7.
9. Yeaton P, Sears RJ, Ledent T et al. Discrimination between chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic adenocarcinoma using artificial intelligence-related algorithms based on image cytometry-generated variables. Cytometry 1998; 32: 309-16. (Pubitemid 28345955)
10. Harada N, Kouzu T, Arima M et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided histologic needle biopsy: Preliminary results using a newly developed endoscopic ultrasound transducer. Gastrointest. Endosc. 1996; 44: 1577-83.
11. Binmoeller KF, Thul R, Rathod V et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided, 18-gauge, fine needle aspiration biopsy of the pancreas using a 2.8 mm channel convex echoendoscope. Gastrointest. Endosc. 1998; 47: 121-7.
12. Voss M, Hammel P, Molas G et al. Value of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses. Gut 2000; 46: 244-9. (Pubitemid 30305852)
13. Ryozawa S, Kitoh H, Gondo T et al. Usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. J. Gastroenterol. 2005; 40: 907-11. (Pubitemid 41511533)
14. Eloubeidi MA, Tamhane A, Varadarajulu S et al. Frequency of major complications after EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: A prospective evaluation. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2006; 63: 622-9.
15. Matsui M, Goto H, Niwa Y et al. Preliminary results of fine needle aspiration histology in upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors. Endoscopy 1998; 30: 750-6.
16. Itoi T, Itokawa F, SofuniAet al. Puncture of solid pancreatic tumors guided by endoscopic ultrasonography:A pilot study series comparing trucut and 19-gauge and 22-gauge aspiration needle. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 362-6.
17. Itoi T, Takei K, Sofuni A et al. Immunohistochemical analysis of p53 and MIB-1 in tissue specimens obtained from endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy for the diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses. Oncol. Rep. 2005; 13: 229-34.
18. Itoi T, Sofuni A, Fukushima N et al. Ribonucleotide reductase subunit 2 mRNA expression in pretreatment biopsies obtained from unresectable pancreatic carcinomas. J. Gastroenterol. 2007; 42: 389-94. (Pubitemid 47097256)
19. Savoy AD, Raimondo M, Woodward T et al. Can endosonographers evaluate on-site cytologic adequacy? A comparison with cytotechnologists. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2007; 65: 953-7.
20. Wiersema MJ, Levy MJ, Harewood GC et al. Initial experience with EUS-guided Trucut needle biopsy of perigastric organs. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2002; 56: 275-8.
21. Levy MJ, Jondal ML, Clain LPNJ et al. Preliminary experience with an EUS-guided trucut biopsy needle compared with EUS-guide FNA. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2003; 57: 101-6.
22. Larghi A, Verna EC, Stavropoulos SN et al. EUS-guided truct needle biopsies in patients with solid pancreatic masses: A prospective study. Gastriintes. Endosc. 2004; 59: 185-90.
23. Storch I, Jorda DOM, Thurer R et al. Advantage of EUS Trucut biopsy combined with fine-needle aspiration without immediate on-site cytopathologic examination. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2006; 64: 505-11.
24. Wiersema MJ, Jondal ML, Schwartz DS et al. Prospective comparison of a 19 versus 22 gauge needle for performing EUS FNA of pancreas mass lesions: Assessment of accuracy and factors influencing safety. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2002; 55: AB240.
25. Song TJ, Kin J, Lee SS et al. The prospective randomized, controlled trial of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration using 22G and 19G aspiration needles for solid pancreatic or peripancreatic masses. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2010; 105: 1739-45.
26. Itoi T, Itokawa F, Kurihara T et al. Objective evaluation of endoscopic ultrasonography needles. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2009; 69: 509-16.
27. Sakamoto H, Kitano M, Komaki T et al. Prospective comparative study of the EUS guided 25-gauge FNAneedle with the 19-gauge Trucut needle and 22-gauge FNA needle in patients with solid pancreatic masses. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2009; 24: 384-90.
28. Imazu H, Uchiyama Y, Kakutani H et al. A prospective comparison of EUS-guided FNA using 25-gauge and 22-gauge needles. Gastroenteol. Res. Pract. 2009; 2009: 546390.
29. Yusuf TE, Ho S, Pavey DA et al. Retrospective analysis of the utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in pancreatic masses, using a 22-gauge needle system: A multicenter experience. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 445-8.
30. Siddiqui UD, Rossi F, Rosenthal LS et al. EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: A prospective, randomized trial comparing 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2009; 70: 1093-7.
31. Nguyen YP, Maple JT, Zhang Q et al. Reliability of gross visual assessment of specimen adequacy during EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic masses. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2009; 69: 1264-70.
32. Hikichi T, Iriswa A, Bhutani MS et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic masses with rapid on-site cytological evaluation by endosonographers without attendance of cytopathologists. J. Gastroenterol. 2009; 44: 322-8.
33. Erickson RA, Sayage-Rabie L, Beissner RS. Factors predicting the number of EUS-guided fine-needle passes for diagnosis of pancreatic malignancies. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2000; 51: 184-90.
34. Imaoka H, Yamao K, Bhatia V et al. Rare pancreatic neoplasms: The utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration-a large single center study. J. Gastroenterol. 2009; 44: 146-53.