Hypothetical use of multidimensional adaptive testing for the assessment of student achievement in the programme for international student assessment

Educational and Psychological Measurement

Volumn 71, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 503-522

  Frey, Andreas ^a   Seitz, Nicki Nils ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE FOR SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS EDUCATION   (Germany)

Author keywords

computerized adaptive testing; item response theory; large scale assessments; multidimensional adaptive testing; Programme for International Student Assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955563193     PISSN: 00131644     EISSN: 15523888     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0013164410381521     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Adams, R.J. (2005). Reliability as a measurement design effect. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 31, 162-172.
2. Adams, R. J., & Wu, M. (Eds.). (2002). PISA 2000 technical report. Paris, France: OECD.
3. Bartram, D., & Hambleton, R.K. (2005). Computer-based testing and the Internet: Issues and advances. New York, NY: Wiley.
4. Cheng, Y., & Chang, H.H. (2009). The maximum priority index method for severely constrained item selection in computerized adaptive testing. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 62, 369-383.
5. Frey, A. (2007). Adaptives Testen [Adaptive testing]. In H. Moosbrugger & A. Kelava (ed.), Testtheorie und Fragebogenkonstruktion [Test theory and construction of questionnaires].(pp. 261-278). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
6. Frey, A., Hartig, J., & Rupp, A. (2009). Booklet designs in large-scale assessments of student achievement: Theory and practice. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice,28, 39-53.
7. Frey, A., & Seitz, N.N. (2009). Multidimensional adaptive testing in educational and psychological measurement: Current state and future challenges. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 35, 89-94.
8. Frey, A., & Seitz, N.N. (2010). Multidimensionale adaptive Kompetenzdiagnostik: Ergebnisse zur Messeffizienz [Multidimensional adaptive testing of competencies: Results regarding measurement efficiency]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 56, 40-51.
9. Hartig, J., & Hoehler, J. (2008). Representation of competencies in multidimensional IRT models with within-item and between-item multidimensionality. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 216, 89-101.
10. Masters, G.N., & Wright, B.D. (1997). The partial credit model. In W. J. van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 101-122). New York, NY: Springer.
11. Oecd. (2001). Knowledge and skills for life: First results from PISA 2000. Paris, France: Author.
12. Oecd. (2004). Learning for tomorrow's world: First results from PISA 2003. Paris, France: Author.
13. Oecd. (2005). PISA 2003 technical report. Paris, France: Author.
14. Oecd. (2006). Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literacy: A framework for PISA 2006. Paris, France: Author.
15. Oecd. (2007). PISA 2006. Science competencies for tomorro s world: Vol. 1. Analysis. Paris, France: Author.
16. Oecd. (2009). PISA 2006 technical report. Paris, France: Author.
17. Parshall, C.G., Spray, J.A., Kalohn, J.C., & Davey, T. (2002). Practical considerations in computer-based testing. New York, NY: Springer.
18. Reckase, M.D. (2009). Multidimensional item response theory. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
19. Sands, W. A., Waters, B. K., & McBride, J. R. (Eds.). (1997). Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
20. Segall, D.O. (1996). Multidimensional adaptive testing. Psychometrika, 61, 331-354.
21. Segall, D.O. (2001). General ability measurement: An application of multidimensional item response theory. Psychometrika, 66, 79-97.
22. Segall, D.O. (2005). Computerized adaptive testing. In K. Kempf-Leonard (Ed.), Encyclopedia of social measurement. New York, NY: Academic Press.
23. van der Linden, W.J. (1999). Multidimensional adaptive testing with a minimum error-variance criterion. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24, 398-412.
24. van der Linden, W. J., & Hambleton, R. K. (Eds.). (1997). Handbook of modern item response theory. New York, NY: Springer.
25. Veldkamp, B.P., & van der Linden, W.J. (2002). Multidimensional adaptive testing with constraints on test content. Psychometrika, 67, 575-588.
26. Veldkamp, B.P., & van der Linden, W.J. (2010). Designing item pools for adaptive testing. In W. J. van der Linden & C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), Elements of adaptive testing (pp. 231-245). New York, NY: Springer.
27. Wang, W.C., & Chen, P.H. (2004). Implementation and measurement efficiency of multidimensional computerized adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28, 450-480.
28. Wu, M.L., Adams, R.J., Wilson, M.R., & Haldane, S.A. (2007). ACER ConQuest version 2.0: Generalised item response modelling software. Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: ACER Press.