|
Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 257-258
|
Re: Renal artery stenting is no longer indicated after ASTRAL: Pros and cons
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
CLINICAL DECISION MAKING;
CLINICAL PROTOCOL;
EQUIPOISE;
ETHICAL DECISION MAKING;
GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE;
HEALTH CARE DISPARITY;
HEALTH CARE NEED;
HUMAN;
LETTER;
PATIENT ASSESSMENT;
PATIENT SELECTION;
PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PROFESSIONAL STANDARD;
RENAL ARTERY;
STENT;
TREATMENT INDICATION;
ANGIOPLASTY;
HUMANS;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;
RENAL ARTERY OBSTRUCTION;
RESEARCH DESIGN;
STENTS;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
VASCULAR PATENCY;
|
EID: 79955552807
PISSN: 01741551
EISSN: 1432086X
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1007/s00270-011-0114-1 Document Type: Letter |
Times cited : (1)
|
References (2)
|