메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 257-258

Re: Renal artery stenting is no longer indicated after ASTRAL: Pros and cons

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; EQUIPOISE; ETHICAL DECISION MAKING; GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE DISPARITY; HEALTH CARE NEED; HUMAN; LETTER; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SELECTION; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; RENAL ARTERY; STENT; TREATMENT INDICATION;

EID: 79955552807     PISSN: 01741551     EISSN: 1432086X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00270-011-0114-1     Document Type: Letter
Times cited : (1)

References (2)
  • 1
    • 70449650655 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Revascularization versus best medical therapy for renal artery stenosis
    • The ASTRAL Trial Investigators
    • The ASTRAL Trial Investigators 2009 Revascularization versus best medical therapy for renal artery stenosis N Engl J Med 361 1952 1962
    • (2009) N Engl J Med , vol.361 , pp. 1952-1962
  • 2
    • 79955554175 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Re: Renal artery stenting is no longer indicated after ASTRAL: Pros and cons
    • doi: 10.1007/s00270-011-0113-2
    • Chalmers N, Moss J, Nicholson AA (2011) Re: Renal artery stenting is no longer indicated after ASTRAL: pros and cons. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. doi: 10.1007/s00270-011-0113-2
    • (2011) Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol
    • Chalmers, N.1    Moss, J.2    Nicholson, A.A.3


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.