The current environment of the theory-practice divide

Science Communication

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 120-129

  Ahern, Lee ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955545967     PISSN: 10755470     EISSN: 15528545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1075547011401039     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Boykoff, M.T., & Boykoff, J.M. (2004). Balance as bias: Global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environmental Change, 14, 125-136.
2. Brulle, R.J. (2000). Agency, democracy and nature. Cambridge: MIT Press.
3. Brulle, R.J. (2010). From environmental campaigns to advancing the public dialog: Environmental communication for civic engagement. Environmental Communication, 4, 82-98.
4. Cox, J.R. (2010). Beyond frames: Recovering the strategic in climate communication. Environmental Communication, 4, 122-133.
5. Escalas, J.E. (2007). Self-referencing and persuasion: Narrative transportation versus analytical elaboration. Journal of Consumer Research, 33, 421-429.
6. Friedman, T.L. (2008). Hot, flat, and crowded. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
7. Green, M.C., Brock, T.C., & Kaufman, G.E. (2004). Understanding media enjoyment: The role of transportation into narrative worlds. Communication Theory, 14, 311-327.
8. Hawken, P. (2007). Blessed unrest. New York, NY: Penguin.
9. Heath, C., & Heath, D. (2007). Made to stick. New York, NY: Random House.
10. Kahlor, L.A. (2007). An augmented risk information seeking model: The case of global warming. Media Psychology, 10, 414-435.
11. Kahlor, L.A., Dunwoody, S., Griffin, R.J., & Neuwirth, K. (2006). Seeking and processing information about impersonal risk. Science Communication, 28, 163-194.
12. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory-analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
13. Kreuter, M.W., Green, M.C., Cappella, J.N., Slater, M.D., Wise, M.E., Storey, D., Woolley, S. (2007). Narrative communication in cancer prevention and control: A framework to guide research and application. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 33, 221-235.
14. Lakoff, G. (2010). Why it matters how we frame the environment. Environmental Communication, 4, 70-81.
15. Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., & Roser-Renouf, C. (2010). Global warming's six Americas: June 2010. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change and George Mason University.
16. Lowenstein, G. (1994). The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 75-98.
17. Maibach, E.W., Nisbet, M., Baldwin, P., Akerlof, K., & Diao, G. (2010). Reframing climate change as a public health issue: An exploratory study of public reactions. BMC Public Health, 10, 299.
18. Nisbet, M.C. (2009, March-April). Communicating climate change: Why frames matter to public engagement. Environment, 51(2), 514-518. Retrieved fromhttp://www.environmentmagazine.org/Archives/Back%20Issues/March-April%202009/Nisbet-full.html.
19. Nordhaus, T., & Shellenberger, M. (2007). Break through. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.
20. Shellenberger, M., & Nordhaus, T. (2004). The death of environmentalism: Global warming politics in a post-environmental world. Retrieved fromhttp://www.thebreakthrough.org/PDF/Death_of_Environmentalism.pdf.
21. Slater, M.D., Rouner, D., & Long, M. (2006). Television dramas and support for controversial public policies: Effects and mechanisms. Journal of Communication, 56, 235-252.