Computer-aided modeling framework for efficient model development, analysis, and identification: Combustion and reactor modeling

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 50, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 5253-5265

  Heitzig, Martina ^a   Sin, Gürkan ^a   Sales Cruz, Mauricio ^b   Glarborg, Peter ^a   Gani, Rafiqul ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b DEPARTAMENTO DE PROCESOS Y TECNOLOGÍA   (Mexico)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADIPIC ACIDS; COMPUTER AIDED; COMPUTER AIDED MODELING; DATABASE CONNECTIONS; FINE CHEMICALS; GAS STREAMS; MODEL DEVELOPMENT; MODEL-BASED; MODELING FRAMEWORKS; MODELING PROCESS; MODELING TOOL; MULTISCALE MODELS; REACTOR MODELING; SCALE MODELS; THERMAL TREATMENT; TIME-CONSUMING TASKS; WORK-FLOWS;

AIR QUALITY; CHEMICAL CONTAMINATION; COMPUTER AIDED ANALYSIS; MODELS; PROCESS ENGINEERING; RIVER POLLUTION; THERMAL POLLUTION;

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL;

EID: 79955543070     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: 15205045     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie101393q     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Grossmann, I. E.; Westerberg, A. W. Research challenges in process systems engineering AIChE J. 2000, 46, 1700-1703
2. Pantelides, C. C. In 11th European symposium on computer-aided process engineering; Gani, R.; Jorgensen, S. B., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2001; pp 15 - 26.
3. Foss, B.; Lohmann, B.; Marquardt, W. A field study of the industrial modeling process J. Process Control 1998, 5/6 (1) 325-338 (Pubitemid 128400773)
4. von Wedel, L.; Marquardt, W.; Gani, R. Modeling frameworks. In Software Architectures and Tools for Computer Aided Process Engineering; Braunschweig, B.; Gani, R., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2002; pp 87 - 125.
5. Marquardt, W. Trends in computer-aided process modeling Comput. Chem. Eng. 1996, 20, 591-609 (Pubitemid 126666055)
6. Brooke, A.; Kendrick, D.; Meeraus, A.; Raman, R. GAMS-A User's Guide; GAMS Development Corp.: New York, 1998.
7. Ausbrooks, R.; Buswell, S.; Dalmas, S.; Devitt, S.; Diaz, A.; Hunter, R.; Smith, B.; Soiffer, N.; Sutor, R.; Watt, S. Mathematical Markup Language (MathML), Version 2.0.; 2001; available online at http://www.w3.org/TR/MathML2/; (accessed 03.05.2010).
8. Modelica Association. Modelica-A Unified Object-Oriented Language for Physical Systems Models. Language Specification; 2000; available online at http://www.modelica.org (accessed 03.05.2010).
9. Process Systems Enterprise. gPROMS Introductory User Guide; Process Systems Enterprise Ltd.: London, 1997.
10. Aspentech. Aspen Modeler 10.2-Reference; Aspen Technology, Inc.: Cambridge, MA, 2001.
11. Stephanopoulos, G.; Henning, G.; Leone, H. MODEL.LA-A modeling framework for process engineering-I. The formal framework Comput. Chem. Eng. 1990, 14, 813-846
12. Jensen, A. K.; Gani, R. A computer-aided system for generation of problem specific process models Comput. Chem. Eng. 1996, 20, 145-150
13. Jensen, A. K. Generation of problem Specific Simulation Methods within an Integrated Computer Aided System. Ph.D. Thesis, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark, 1998.
14. Klatt, K.-U.; Marquardt, W. Perspectives for process systems engineering-Personal views from academia and industry Comput. Chem. Eng. 2009, 33, 536-550
15. Bogusch, R.; Lohmann, B.; Marquardt, W. Computer-aided process modeling with modkit Comput. Chem. Eng. 2001, 25 (1) 963-995
16. Hangos, K.; Cameron, I. Process Modeling and Model Analysis, Process Systems Engineering, 1st ed; Academic Presss: London, 2001.
17. Brun, R.; Kühni, M.; Siegrist, H.; Gujer, W.; Reichert, P. Practical identifiability of ASM2d parameters-systematic selection and tuning of parameter subsets Water Res. 2002, 36, 4113-4127 (Pubitemid 35303342)
18. Sin, G.; Eliasson, L. A.; Gernaey, K. V. Good modeling practice (GMoP) for PAT applications: Propagation of input uncertainty and sensitivity analysis Biotechnol. Prog. 2009, 25, 1043-1053
19. Sales-Cruz, M.; Gani, R. In Computer-Aided Chemical Engineering: Dynamic Model Development, 1st ed.; Asprey, S. P.; Macchietto, S., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2003.
20. Kee, R. J.; Coltrin, M. E.; Glarborg, P. Chemically reacting flow-theory and practice; Wiley Interscience: Hoboken, NJ, 2003.
21. X Conversion at High Pressure Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 2008, 40, 454-480
22. National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST Chemical Kinetics Database, Gaithersburg, MD, 2000. Available online at http://kinetics.nist.gov/ kinetics/index.jsp (accessed 03.05.2010).
23. Kee, R. J.; Rupley, F. M.; Miller, J. A. The Chemkin Thermodynamic Data Base. Sandia Report, SAND87-8215B, Sandia National Laboratories: Livermore, CA, 1994.
24. Troe, J. Predictive possibilities of unimolecular rate theory J. Phys. Chem. 1979, 83, 114-126
25. Zwietering, T. N. The degree of mixing in continuous flow systems Chem. Eng. Sci. 1959, 11, 1-15
26. Glarborg, P.; Johnsson, J. E.; Dam-Johansen, K. Kinetics of Homogeneous Nitrous Oxide Decomposition Combust. Flame 1994, 99, 523-532
27. Sin, G.; Vanrolleghem, P. A. Extensions to modeling aerobic carbon degradation using combined respirometric-titrimetric measurements in view of activated sludge model calibration Water Res. 2007, 41, 3345-3358 (Pubitemid 47031260)
28. Brun, R.; Reichert, P.; Künsch, H. R. Practical identifiability analysis of large environmental simulation models Water Resour. Res. 2001, 37, 1015-1030 (Pubitemid 32516054)