Evaluation of genetic diversity in five different species of family solanaceae using cytological characters and protein profiling

Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Journal

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages

  Bhat, T M ^a   Kudesia, R ^a  

^a BUNDELKHAND UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Genetic diversity; Mitotic index; Pollen viability; SDS PAGE; UPGMA dendrogram

Indexed keywords

VEGETABLE PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; AUBERGINE; CELL ASSAY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROP IMPROVEMENT; CULTIVATED SPECIES; DATURA; DATURA ALBA; GENE CLUSTER; GENETIC IDENTIFICATION; GENETIC SIMILARITY; GENETIC VARIABILITY; MITOSIS INDEX; NONHUMAN; PALYNOLOGY; PEPPER; PLANT CELL; PLANT GENETICS; PLANT SEED; POLYACRYLAMIDE GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; SOLANUM; SOLANUM XANTHOCARPUM; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TOMATO; WILD SPECIES;

CAPSICUM ANNUUM; DATURA METEL; LYCOPERSICON; SOLANACEAE; SOLANUM; SOLANUM MELONGENA; SOLANUM XANTHOCARPUM;

EID: 79955536715     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21503516     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Al-Wadi MH, 2007. Palynological and cytological characters of three species of genus Solanum from Saudi Arabia. Journal of Biological Sciences, 7(4): 626-631.
2. Baquar SR, 2005. Cytomorphological studies in the family Solanaceae from west Pakistan. Genetica, 38: 388-397.
3. Knapp S, 2002. A phylogenetic perspective on fruit diversity in the Solanaceae. Journal of Experimental Botany, 53: 2001-2002.
4. Welsh J, McClelland M, 1990. Finger printing genomes using PCR with arbitrary primers. Nucleic Acids Resolution, 18: 7213-7218.
5. Karihaloo JL, Kaur M, Singh S, 2004. Seed protein diversity in Solanum melongena and its wild and weedy relatives. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 49: 533-539.
6. Kamel EA, Loufty MHA, 2001. The significance of cuticular features, petiole anatomy and SDS-PAGE in the taxonomy of Lauraceae. Pakistan Journal of Bioscience, 4: 1094-1100.
7. ILLcheva V, San LH, Dimitrov B, Zagorskan, 2000. Morphological and cytological characteristics of somatic hybrids of Nicotiana tabaccum and Nicotiana megalosiphon. Cellular and Developmental Biology, 36: 2-12.
8. Anu A, Peter KV, 2003. Analysis of seed protein of 29 lines of Capsicum annum L. by polyacryl-amide gel electrophoresis. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 50: 239-234.
9. Cruz AS, Engle LM, Laude RP, 1994. Genetic diversity in Capsicum annum L. based on SDS-PAGE of seed protein. Genetica, 19: 2-9.
10. Sheidai M, Goldasteh M, Khatamsaz M, 2002. Cytology and seed protein analysis of Solanaceae species in Iran. Nucleus CAT-INIST, 45: 36-43.
11. Singhali VK, Kumar P, 2008. Cytomixis during microsporogenesis in the diploid and tetraploid cytotypes of Withania somnifera L Dunal. Comparative Cytogenetics, 2: 85-92.
12. Tanksley SD, 2004. The genetic development and molecular basis of fruit size and shape variation in tomato. Plant Cell, 16: 181-189.
13. Yousuf Z, Masood S, Khan SK, Rabani A, 2008. Evaluation of taxonomic status of medicinal species of the genus Hoyoscyamous, Withania, Atropa and Datura on the basis of PAGE. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 40: 2289-2296.
14. Cook RT, 1984. The characterization and identification of crop cultivars by electrophoresis. Electrophoresis, 5: 59-72.
15. Kalifa SF, Badar AZ, Atta EL, Enani MM, 1998. Electrophoresis of seed proteins and their impact on taxonomic relationships in the Solanaceae. Journal of Union of Arab Biologists, 5(B): 171-180.
16. Posch A, vanden Berg BM, Duranton C, Angelika G, 1993. Polymorphism of pepper (Capsicum annum L.) seed proteins studied by two dimensional electrophoresis with immobilized pH gradients. Electrophoresis, 15(2): 297-304.
17. Rajasekaran S, Sivasubramanian V, 2004. Cytology of the F1 hybrid of S. zuccagnianum Dun x S. melongena L. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 41: 85-86.
18. Shibata D, 2005. Genomic sequencing and functional genomics approaches in tomato. Journal of General Plant Pathology, 71: 1-7.
19. Smith JSC, Williams GK, 1994. Arbitrary primed mediated fingerprinting in plants: case studies in plant breeding, taxonomy and phylogeny, molecular ecology and evolution. Approaches and Applications, Birkhauser Verlage, 5-15.
20. Stebbins GL, 1957. Genetics, evolution and plant breeding. Proceedings of Symposium on Genetics and Plant Breeding in Southeast Asia, New Delhi. Indian Journal of Genetics, 17: 129-141.
21. Malviya N, Yadav D, 2010. RAPD analysis among pigeon pea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Mill sp.] cultivars for their genetic diversity. Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Journal, 2010: GEBJ-1.
22. Ahmad G, Mudasir, Kudesia R, Shikha, Srivastava MK, 2010. Evaluation of genetic diversity in pea (Pisum sativum L) using RAPD analysis. Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Journal, 2010: GEBJ-16.
23. Elham AA, El-Hady A, Atef AA, Haiba, Nagwa R, El-Hamid A, Aida A, 2010. Phylogenetic diversity and relationships of some tomato varieties by electrophoretic protein and RAPD analysis. Journal of American Science, 6 (11).
24. Vishwanath K, Prasanna KPR, Pallvi HM, Prasad S, Ramegowda, Devaraju PJ, 2011. Identification of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) varieties through total soluble seed proteins. Research Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2(1): 8-12.