Comparative analysis of training strategies for neural network-based spectral unmixing of laboratory-simulated forest hyperspectral scenes

2010 IAPR Workshop on Pattern Recognition in Remote Sensing, PRRS 2010

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages

  Plaza, Javier ^a   Plaza, Antonio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXTREMADURA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANOPY MODEL; COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS; HYPERSPECTRAL; HYPERSPECTRAL DATA; LINEAR MIXTURE MODELS; MULTILAYER PERCEPTRON NEURAL NETWORKS; NONLINEAR MIXTURE MODELING; PRIORI INFORMATION; SPECTRAL UNMIXING; TRAINING SAMPLE; TRAINING STRATEGY;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; MIXTURES; PATTERN RECOGNITION; REMOTE SENSING; SAMPLING;

MULTILAYER NEURAL NETWORKS;

EID: 79955528988     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/PRRS.2010.5742802     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. J. B. Adams, M. O. Smith, and P. E. Johnson. Spectral mixture modeling: a new analysis of rock and soil types at the Viking Lander 1 site. Journal of Geophysical Research, 91:8098-8112, 1986.
2. A. Baraldi, E. Binaghi, P. Blonda, P. A. Brivio, and P. Rampini. Comparison of the multilayer perceptron with neuro-fuzzy techniques in the estimation of cover class mixture in remotely sensed data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 39:994-1005, 2001. (Pubitemid 32534345)
3. C. M. Bishop. Neural networks for pattern recognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
4. C.-I. Chang. Hyperspectral Imaging: Techniques for Spectral Detection and Classification. Kluwer Academic/ Plenum Publishers: New York, 2003.
5. C.-I. Chang and Q. Du. Estimation of number of spectrally distinct signal sources in hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 42(3):608-619, 2004.
6. N. S. Goel and R. L. Thompson. A snapshot of canopy reflectance models and a universal model for the radiation regime. Remote Sensing Reviews, 18:197-225, 2000. (Pubitemid 32324918)
7. A. F. H. Goetz, G. Vane, J. E. Solomon, and B. N. Rock. Imaging spectrometry for Earth remote sensing. Science, 228:1147-1153, 1985.
8. J. C. Harsanyi and C.-I. Chang. Hyperspectral image classification and dimensionality reduction: An orthogonal subspace projection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 32(4):779-785.
9. D. Heinz and C.-I. Chang. Fully constrained least squares linear mixture analysis for material quantification in hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 39:529-545, 2001. (Pubitemid 32400422)
10. B. Hu, J. R. Miller, J. Wang, and N. S. Goel. Investigation of linear spectral mixtures of the reflectance spectra using laboratory simulated forest scenes. Proc. IEEE Intl. Geosci. Remote Sens. Symp., 3:1535-1537, 2002. (Pubitemid 35228768)
11. W. Liu and E. Y. Wu. Comparison of non-linear mixture models. Remote Sensing of Environment, 18:1976- 2003, 2004.
12. A. Plaza, J. A. Benediktsson, J. Boardman, J. Brazile, L. Bruzzone, G. Camps-Valls, J. Chanussot, M. Fauvel, P. Gamba, J. Gualtieri, M. Marconcini, J. C. Tilton, and G. Trianni. Recent advances in techniques for hyperspectral image processing. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113:110-122, 2009.
13. A. Plaza, P. Martinez, R. Perez, and J. Plaza. A quantitative and comparative analysis of endmember extraction algorithms from hyperspectral data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 42(3):650-663, 2004.
14. J. Plaza and A. Plaza. Spectral mixture analysis of hyperspectral scenes using intelligently selected training samples. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 7, 2010, doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2009.2036139.
15. J. Plaza, A. Plaza, R. Perez, and P.Martinez. On the use of small training sets for neural network-based characterization ofmixed pixels in remotely sensed hyperspectral images. Pattern Recognition, 42:3032-3045, 2009.