Doctors breaching patient privacy: Orwell redux

Medical Journal of Australia

Volumn 194, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 403-404

  Handelsman, David J ^a   Turner, Leo A ^a   Conway, Ann J ^a  

^a ANZAC Research Institute   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BENEFICENCE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL LIABILITY; PATIENT AUTONOMY; PATIENT INFORMATION; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PROFESSIONAL SECRECY; SPERM DONOR;

EID: 79955516555     PISSN: 0025729X     EISSN: 13265377     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2011.tb03030.x     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 6th ed. New York: Oxford University Press USA, 2008.
2. New South Wales Government. Assisted Reproductive Technology Act 2007 (NSW). No. 69. http://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au/scanview/inforce/s/1/?TITLE=%22Assisted%20Reproductive%20Technology%20Act%202007%20No%2069%22&nohits=y (accessed Mar 2011).
3. Australian Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee. Inquiry into donor conception in Australia. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 2011. http://www.aph.gov.au/senate/committee/legcon_ctte/donor_conception/index.htm (accessed Mar 2011).
4. National Health and Medical Research Council. Medical genetic testing: information for health professionals. Canberra: NHMRC, 2010. http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications/synopses/e99syn.htm (accessed Mar 2011).